The problem with Fuckstick's base is that they're fucking morons

[Rabrrrrrr]

Check this out - it's a post of mine from last November. The stupid shitwad can't even fucking read, and that's the problem with Fuckstick's base: they can't read. He totally misquotes me, and clearly never understood what I was actually saying.

http://moonbatdaily.blogspot.com/2005_11_01_moonbatdaily_archive.html

I didn't say that Christians are assholes, you fuckwit. I'm a Christian, and as people here know, I'm a very serious one. I said that only asshole Christians would think that painting is non-heretical.

You see, you dimwitted shitbrain, there's a difference between "all Christians are assholes" and "asshole Christians". It's called GRAMMAR.

But of course, that's the way it is with these people - first, they don't understand nuance; second, they can't differentiate between a group and a member in that group (such as, if someone criticizes an individual Christian, then they must ipso facto be criticising ALL OF CHRISTIANITY); third, they simply don't understand a lot of words, don't track well through complex sentence construction, and can't manage to track a thoughtful idea that is developed over the course of a number of sentences. They can only read in a way that makes, basically, every sentence its own chapter that stands alone.

[DrGonzoLives]

1. He looks like a real wiener

To "Full Auto" - he said dickfop, not dickfob. A dickfob sounds like a sex toy.

[Rabrrrrrr]

2. He really does, doesn't he?

I thought the same thing. That's not a guy I want my daughter to marry - looks like he would be an abusive father and abusive husband.

But, he'll find himself a nice bible-based girly who believes black eyes are God's sign of a loving wife.

[xmas74]

3. I love the way that asshat used

Rev's quote in there. He hs no idea what he's talking about or who he is quoting, does he.

BTW-my evangelical relatives would be highly offended over that picture of Christ. They would consider that picture to be heresy.

[XemaSab]

4. Those leftist loony's...

:eyes:

[cssmall]

5. It's just a continuation upon a theme.

For centuries those in power have been using Jesus and replicating Jesus' image in such a way to benefit them the most. This is all this is doing.

For the true Jesus, he had tanned skin, brown eyes, a beard of course, and short, curly hair (more than likely). Those are most dominant traits passed through the generations of Middle Eastern descent.

[Initech]

6. Critical thinking / reading is not their area of expertise...

[Rabrrrrrr]

7. There's the understatement of the century!

They also place more value in the person offering "facts" than they do in where the facts came from. Hence, Anne Coulter can spew out all the "facts" she wants, with no footnotes, and her followers will believe her because they assume her character is trustworthy. Same with Robertson, Falwell, or Fuckstick. That is, they can live in only a binary state of fully trusting an authority, or fully distrusting an authority.

Smart people, though, while we might give more creedance to the people we admire, still insist on footnotable "facts" and also feel free to disagree with our experts when we feel that they are wrong on an opinion, a deduction, or an analysis. We live in a very analog state of varying degrees of respecting/trusting an authority; and hence, a guy like me can have intense distaste for Cal Thomas and wish he would shut the hell up for being a lying creep, while at the same time, have a couple of his articles that I cut out to keep because he was spot on right in his analysis and I agree with his opinion.

Fuckwads don't have that ability - Bill Clinton can be either 100% trustworthy or untrustworthy, but not partially trustworthy.

Or, in the case I posted here, fuckwads can only be 100% pro-Christian without critique, or 100% against it; they can't accept the notion of a Christian critiquing his own faith tradition, his own faith journey, or allow the truth that I can critique my fellow believers without trashing the faith, or without denying that they are still children of God, or without denying that I still think they are Christians, even if I disagree with their approach.