Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How come people will go back 30 or 40 years for rock music

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 12:02 PM
Original message
How come people will go back 30 or 40 years for rock music
but won't go back 60 or 70 for swing and jazz? I mean, as long as you are listening to music made before you were born, why not check out an even richer experience? I'm always surprised at the reverence for the Beatles from people born in the 70's or 80's, when very few born in the 50's or 60's know much about Benny Moten or Jimmy Lunceford.

Maybe it's about popularity vs. artistic merit, but the market for "classic rock" seems unlimited, and hundreds of threads on DU bear this out. But a song by the Beatles, the Who or Tower of Power doesn't sound "right" when it's played by a current artist, while standard American tunes from 20 or 30 years before that are timeless, and will bear all kinds of arrangements and renditions.

So c'mon, "Classic Rock" fans, dig a little deeper and find the groove.

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. do you mind if I also go back in time and dig a little deeper into
my vault for a little classical ....some Bach anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. I loves me some Bach, even though he's a little bit pre-classical.
I wish elementary part-writing were a part of fundamental music education in all public schools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. You philistines don't go back nearly far enough.
Have you ever taken the time to listen to the Third Movement of "Ungh Ungh Baaaaa Oooo Ungh" by Grot the Firemaker? It's transcendant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #27
43. LOL. FedEx is running some funny commercials in the US with
Edited on Sat Mar-25-06 01:02 AM by Radio_Lady
two "insulted cavemen." Not sure they're playing in Canada, 'though.

Now, THEY knew how to play those hollow trees with sticks!

The other day, I told somebody I like New Age music.

He said, "Do you know what New Age music is when it's played backwards?"

I said, "What?"

He said, "New Age music."

Then he insulted Zamfir and the pan flute. I told him I just bought a CD with pan flute music when we were in Arizona.

To be clear where I'm coming from, I don't care for reggae and I hate rap. But we saw Spike Lee's new movie "Inside Man" tonight -- and I just loved the music. I have no idea why.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #43
46. Knock knock...
Who's there?

Knock knock...

Who's there?

Knock knock...

Who's there?

Knock knock...

Who's there?

Knock knock...

Who's there?

Knock knock...

Who's there?

Knock knock...

Who's there?

Knock knock...

Who's there?

Knock knock...

Who's there?

Knock knock...

Who's there?

Knock knock...

Who's there?

Knock knock...

Who's there?

Knock knock...

Who's there?

Knock knock...

Who's there?

Knock knock...

Who's there?

Knock knock...

Who's there?

Knock knock...

Who's there?


Philip Glass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #46
48. What? Do you mean...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. Koyaanisqatsi
He scored the film Koyaanisqatsi. If you haven't seen it you may want to try it. Some people love it, some hate it.

He also did the score for the Truman Show which has become a trailer temp score staple.


Most consider him a minimalist composer but he moved away from that years ago. That's what the joke is about.

Repetitive music is hard for most people to appreciate. You just have to let it flow and appreciate the subleties. It does work best when used to accompany visuals like film.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. Appreciate your clearing that up. I did see one of the later films:
Naqoyqatsi (2002)

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0145937/

The visuals gave me a terrible headache and I voted it one of the worst films of 2002.

Thanks for taking the time to explain this to me!

Re: Repetitive music: Maurice Ravel's "Bolero" (long orchester form) is one of my favorite symphony pieces.

In peace,

Radio_Lady in Oregon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. Ahh, digi-skatski
Yeah, I saw it and it was a bit too much.

Koyaanisqatsi is much easier on the eyes. Mostly a string of slow motion and time-lapsed filmwork set to music. It attempts to show that our modern life isn't working.

Should be seen in a theater if at all possible.

Bolero is a wonderful piece of music. There was an excellent animation set to it years ago. I think it was included as part of Allegro Non Troppo http://imdb.com/title/tt0074121 but can't remember for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. One other film that comes to mind -- Blake Edwards' "10"
http://imdb.com/title/tt0078721/

10 (1979) with Dudley Moore and Bo Derek

Non-Original Music by
Maurice Ravel (from "Bolero")

My husband loves Maurice Ravel's work, especially "La Valse"!

My favorite is "Le Tombeau de Couperin" and I had the recording from an album showing an exotic woman with a lighted matchstick in her mouth! Bizarre!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/profiles/ravel.shtml

http://www.maurice-ravel.net/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. Oh yeah, 10
Gave Bolero a whole new reputation. :-)

I actually bought the 45 that was released from the movie. 3 and a half minute version of Bolero. Not quite the same.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. Or maybe "FILL UP GLASS"?
I guess there's a punch line there somewhere, but I'm not able to grasp the humor.
I'm not familiar with Philip Glass, the composer, either.

Original soundtrack from "Inside Man" was composed by Terence Blanchard. Not familiar with him, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dangerously Amused Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ha!



Jimmy Lunceford - Swingin' Uptown!

Benny Moten - Layfayette!

Erskine Hawkins - Swing Out!

Fletcher Henderson - Mary Had a Little Lamb!

Bunny Berigan - All God's Chillun Got Rhythm! ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's how my tastes grew
Became musically aware in the early 70's. Learned the stuff of the 50's and 60's both country and rock.

Saw The Benny Goodman movie one day and the Glenn Miller one a few years later and started listening to swing, jazz, big band.

Got diverted into classical through my love of Tull (Bouree) Worked my way back up to the romantics and the impressionists.

Diverted into early synth music, then some techno, then off to minimalism.

There is great music in every field and if it moves you it works.

I think I can honestly say I have no real favorite genre of music.


My primary concession and joy in classic rock is that I listen to most of it on a station that played the songs when they were new, KOMA, so at least it doesn't feel like I listening so much to a marketed genre station like the other 2 classic rock stations in town.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Was fed and weaned on KOMA
Grew up in OKC...am a mid-50s born baby.

Now that they have streaming, am going to catch the Friday Song at 5pm (CST) today! Yeeow! A-yip-i-o-ee ay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ptah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
37. I was born and raised on the Montana prairie
I remember {I must have been eleven or twelve} after sunset,
KOMA on a tube AM radio.



Ah, the good old days!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #37
52. I remember listening to KOMA in Wyoming at night
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theophilus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder the same things. I love all sorts of music from classical to
popular songs of the 1800s, to blue grass, to turn of the 20th century, to popular tunes up to the Fifties, to Fifties, etc. My mom was almost forty when she had me. I grew up in the early sixties but, for some reason, took a shine to the 78 rpm records she had saved from her younger days. I didn't listen to the Beatles (although I love them now), I listened to Bing Crosby, Glenn Miller, Jimmy Lunceford, Tommy Dorsey and many others. I still search for stuff on the net to make my own cds and have a very eclectic taste. (I really like Russian folksongs, too!) It makes me sad that my kids won't get into the older stuff, but I plant the seed by playing stuff when they can't escape. I don't force it on them but we all listen to each other's stuff. Oh, well. Thanks for bringing it up. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. My daughter listens to ragtime.
She's only five and she loves it. It does help that we are only a half hour away from the Scott Joplin festival.

She wants to go this June.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. If we like classic rock
what makes you think we will like swing and jazz? Mostly I do not listen to swing and jazz from any era.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
djeseru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. I grew up listening to swing and big band...
...courtesy of my very cool grandmother. I knew who Billie Holiday and Duke Ellington was before any contemporary artists, sung Christmas carols along with The Andrews Sisters and understood that Louis Armstrong was a gift from God.

I also knew that Lunceford's orchestra had the best performances and Benny Moten died during a tonsillectomy - Count Basie took it from there.

My favorite is Fletcher Henderson and I'm trying to dig up some from Jean Goldkette.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritingIsMyReligion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. 'Cause many people think swing and jazz are "boring."
Edited on Fri Mar-24-06 01:35 PM by WritingIsMyReligion
Mmmm yeah, listening to Miles on Kind of Blue is an exceptionally boring experience....Yeah.... And that Duke guy.....what a total bore "Take the 'A' Train" is.....Mmhmm...

:eyes::eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
39. You don't know Anything!
You should hear the Rap Group "Dave Brubeck Quartet" :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyskank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ah, it's the boomers
Everything they grew up with is classic and more worthy than anything else, and since they are the ones running the world right now, their culture is what is worth cherishing. Everything that came afterwards is shit and everything that came before doesn't exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritingIsMyReligion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. LOL!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyskank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Chip? Shoulder? Me?
Nevah!!!!

-billyskank, generation X. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritingIsMyReligion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yup, we're a weird bunch, all right.
:D

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Hey at least your gen got a name
They lump early 60's babies like me in with the boomers and we have nothing n common. I didn't even really know the Beatles until after they had broken up although I did have a Yellow Submarine lunchbox. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. it's called "The Generation Gap"
The chasm between the generation that grew up with swing and jazz and the generation that grew up with the British invasion rock and roll is huge in many ways.

In terms of musical style, current music has more in common with that of the late 1960's than the music of the 60's had with that of the 40's. You can almost draw a stright line between the Velvet Underground and a current punk band, or between Led Zepplin (AKA "New Yardbirds") and a current metal band. You can't do the same 20 years back.

This chasm was reflected in many other matters of lifestyle, fashion and values, not just music. I think kids today have much more in common with their parents than I did with mine. Body piercing and tattoos don't phase someone who grew up in the 60's, but are incomprehensible to the parents of the '60s generation.

That said, I really like the music of the 30's and 40's as a reflection of the times, and a fore-runner of what was to come. We had rock and roll in the 1940's, it was just called "jump blues" and white kids never listened to it. Western swing shows the origins of country and rockabilly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ptah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Here's the playlist I burned just the other night
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. Nice list. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ptah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. It's easy to go back to find good stuff.
Edited on Fri Mar-24-06 09:04 PM by Ptah
It is difficult to go forward from what I grew up with.

I am reminded of my grandmother commenting that Glenn Miler
was 'young people's music".

I lost track in the early eighties (80's).

I keep hoping that some youngster will take me by my hand
and show me the evolution.


yada yadda

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think it depends on what the music means to you
Some of that music from 30-40 years ago was from when I was a kid. I mean, I appreciate swing, but it doesn't bring the joy & happiness that music from the late 60s/early 70s brings me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Right, that's the point I was trying to make.
It's natural for people to cherish the music of their youth, as Boomers do the Beatles and Gen-Xers do the 80's and MTV era. But when people 25 years old are heavily into Led Zep or the Doors, they have reached back into another generation. I'm wondering why not pick a more hip generation, one that truly unites the black and white strands of American culture and music, which is what happened with popular music in the 30's and 40's? The natural outgrowth of such a unity, Motown, is a weak imitation of the great swing and jazz music that went before it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Because that stuff doesn't ROCK like Zep or Sabbath.
Edited on Fri Mar-24-06 03:29 PM by RandomKoolzip
People are, again, vainly using sociology to gauge a phenomenon when plain ol' aesthetics will do just fine. To wit: lots of people like the sound of electric guitars in concert with a propulsive rhytym section and a singer who can project, working out on blues-based harmonic climates. That's just the way it is. Dragging "boomers" and politics and other shit into this argument is useless: people like to get rocked. Asking people to check out old swing after hearing Black Sabbath or Television or Fugazi or Thin Lizzy or Black Flag is like suggesting that a horse-drawn carriage is just as good as a Ferrari. Sorry! (Just as a side note, I have a few Benny Moten tunes on my iPod. I dig some of that stuff, as a historical fling, but it just can't compare as an aesthetic experience to the best rock: it's tinkertoy stuff....why settle for tiny plastic water powered rockets when I can ride on the space shuttle?)


And Motown is a weak imitation of swing and jazz?! :rofl: I'll be sure and tell Lamont Dozier that. He'll laugh, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Sing, Sing, Sing outrocks both of them
This may be the single most controversial thing I have ever said on DU but I mean it.

:-)

But I do agree with you about Motown. Nothing weak about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Sing Sing Sing blows the doors off most current "rock".
Especially when you imagine it in the context of being "new". It must have horrified parents with its "jungle rhythms".

Lest we forget that Benny Goodman was the first teen idol, and his matinee performance at Radio City sparked the whole idea of marketing music to teenagers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dangerously Amused Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Sing, Sing, Sing will KICK YOUR ROCK-N-ROLL ASS. Yes INDEED!



:7


*Props to Skittles.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Speaking of "Sing, Sing, Sing,"
Louis Prima's band in the 1950's rocked the house. Check out the live medley of "Them There Eyes" and "Honeysuckle Rose." Whooosh.

Next to that kind of cooking, Led Zeppelin are milquetoast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Nothing wrong with rocking, but swinging is a higher calling.
Speaking as one who grew up in the Age of Rock, and who has played hard-rocking music on stages with thousands of people boogieing out front, I won't deny that the power of the straight eighth note and the back beat can move lots of people, and is fun to play. However, I suggest that music for dancing, which is what popular music has mostly been, has declined as the quality of the dancing has declined (although it may be and chicken-and-egg question as to what has been the cause.) The skilled and elegant Lindy hoppers of the Swing Era are in a different league from the bouncing throngs at a Van Halen concert.

And to relegate hard-stomping music of the 30s and 40s to historical interest is to ignore its vitality in live performance, which is how music of that era sheds its low-fi recording constraints. Loud is good, but it's not what makes quality in music. It's the subtlety of the beat, and that's where swinging is more advanced than rocking. I don't know if a Ferrari is "better" than a horse-drawn carriage (not that accept your analogy without reservation), but it's mostly louder, faster and more polluting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. I once attended an Oregon Symphony concert conducted by Norman Leyden
who had been in Glenn Miller's band.

They played a lot of swing standards, and out in front were some kids from one of the local performing arts emphasis high school, swing dancing to the music.

I knew the mother of one of the dancers, and she said that the kids really got into the music.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #31
51. We went to the South Park blocks to hear Norman Leyden one
summer night. He is amazing, and so were the members of his pops concert group. It was a fabulous night! He's a treasure!



http://www.orsymphony.org/orchestra/conductors/leyden.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
65. hmmm
I think this is the first thing you have said about music that I actually disagree with, RKZ. I think you can find many jazz/swing/ shuffle, what have you, influences in rock and roll and even in harder rock that came later....

One of the cool things about the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame is their emphasis on modern and less modern rockers, i.e., "what came first" and influences in general... some were quite surprising. Other influences you can hear in the tunes if you listen carefully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. I only seem to like music that was made before I was born!
Swing and Jazz are right up there for me, as is classical. I love the old scratchy recordings with tunes from the early part of the century and older European artists!

There are modern songs that I like, but there are very few artists these days or even in the past 30 years that do it for me enough to listen to one of their albums all the way through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
64. actually if you listen carefully to many of the
Beatle's tunes, there is a lot of vaudeville and swing influence....also much of the British invasion stuff in general, like the Kinks.

I love jazz, but then I was raised by depression era parents parents who liked classical, rock, and showtunes. Cab Calloway and other jazz musicians have influenced a number of rock folk as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. What you like is what you like
And although I bow to no one on this board in musical smugness, I would not presume to tell someone that (s)he lacks groove if (s)he simply doesn't happen to get off on my favorite music.

Moreover, I think that the fact that the music of 30-40 years ago retains its relevance indicates that the social/cultural/political issues of 30-40 years ago remain important. I'm reminded once again of that bumper sticker Tom Tomorrow sells, Dubya = Nixon - brain. The fact that we have to confront the same sort of unaccountable dictatorial paranoid administration prescribes a certain aesthetic response in common between us and the classic rock era, and which is conspicuously absent from the jazz decades.

And honestly, In a Silent Way is boring, and if I'm not in exactly the right mood, so are Bitches Brew, Jack Johnson, Live Evil, etc. I'd trade all the Miles in my collection for a new King Crimson that sounded like the old King Crimson.

Yeah, I got an attitude today. Can you tell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. I listen to the 1920's and Weeny Junk Radio on Shout Radio.
I love that old stuff. I listen to all kinds of music but NEVER Christian Rock. The name alone chills me. I don't listen to the new pop music either, mostly. Mainly because we have crappy radio stations in the North Bay playing old 60s rock. They play the same old rock songs over and over and over. Never any Motown that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. wait a minute! hip hop fans go back
tens of thousands of years to rock beating and chanting


(there I go again!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bikebloke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. Been exploring sounds from the 30's and 40's.
Early Count Basie, Edith Piaf, Glenn Miller, Jean Sablon, Louis Prima, Fats Waller, Charles Trenet. Just looking into Benny Goodman. I'll probably buy a CD soon. Though it takes weeks or even months before I opt to make a purchase, so my collection grows at a glacial pace.

These older tunes sound good coming up on an iTunes shuffle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
30. Really, there's so much great early jazz and pop standards, as well as
about 1,000 years of early and classical music. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
34. 'Cause swing and jazz don't rock.
I disagree about timelessness. You can find that in the music of any era; it just takes a while to be certain.

I believet that the rest of your point is perfectly valid, though it could apply as well to Gregorian chants, into which I am unlikely to delve very deeply. Passionate music of any era could be good, but there are limits to how far afield most of us will go in search of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
38. because
most going back 60 or 70 years are....gone. :shrug: it's the boomers, man. there are so many of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
40. I was born in the 80s and love everything.
From the 1920s to today. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
41. Swing was all the craze in '98
It was good for selling khakis and making twentysomethings feel hip for awhile. But actually, it is the most cliched and uninteresting of all of the genre's variations. It didn't help that Ken Burns devotes nearly 40% of his documentary to it. Then dismisses everything after "A Love Supreme".

Jazz is great, I love it... but it is largely a dead genre. Rock isn't far behind with the way it has been going as of late.

For something deeper than swing, I go to Jimmie Rodgers, Blind Willie McTell, or Woody Guthrie. Now THOSE are timeless artists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #41
54. You make a good point about the folk-based artists, but
listen to Benny Carter's small-group recording of "Moten Swing" or "Ruby" and tell me it's not as timeless as Jimmie Rodgers. Knowing how to blow a horn doesn't automatically consign you to a museum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. .
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #41
66. don't agree that swing is boring at all
lots of those folks you are talking abou have been ripping off Goodman and Cab Calloway for quite some time now. Some better than others. Jimmy Dale Gilmore, Brian Setzer Orchestra, Squirrel Nut Zippers, Diddy Bops come to mind.

I don't agree that jazz is dead, perhaps unappreciated by the mainstream, but there is still quite a lively scene in some parts of the US ( lots of avant stuff in Chicago!) and in Europe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
42. I listen to both 40's big band music and 60's rock. They're both great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
44. I go back for everything. I used Napster to find stuff from the 1910s.
Oldest thing I got was from 1907. Can't find THAT stuff on iTunes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
45. Real good question,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
47. Swing is king!
Nuttin' like steppin' back for some College of Musical Knowledge!

Now we're cooking with gas, and that ain't no jive talking!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FunkyLeprechaun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
50. Some rock
Is so much easier to understand than today's music. The words definitely go along with the beat. For example.... Sugar Sugar vs... Genie In A Bottle.

(I'm tone deaf so don't take my opinion too seriously)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
53. well, I don't buy your assessment of beatles/who tunes
as I've heard many great covers of both from performers of all kinds of styles. Nor do I necessarily accept that this is the best criteria for what's worth listening to. Or the "richer experience" assessment.

But I do love jazz, of many shades, variations, and decades ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
56. Actually it is about the cultural power of the baby-boomers
(My thoughts on baby boomers are well known - I think they are a blight)

That said, you are noticing the power of the market. Music means the most to an average person when they are teens and early 20s. These are your favorite tunes as you get older.

The Baby Boomers because of their huge demographic force want to continue to keep their music popular. Some people will like it in later generations. It looks like we are stuck with classic rock until the boomers die off in 40 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
59. I have tons of jazz, I am particularly a fan of...
The heavily orchestrated early Miles Davis albums. You know - Sketches of Spain, Porgy & Bess, Quiet Nights...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
khashka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
63. You ain't talking to me Ron....
I love rock, punk. blues,ragtime, etc.

Cool thing about being alive now.... we have access to all of it.


Khash.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertha katzenengel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
67. Who says we don't? XM Radio has been a godsend.
I regularly listen to 40s on 4 as well as 70s on 7. What a treasure trove!

Do you ever listen to NPR? Each April 1 they run (either on Morning Edition or ATC, I don't remember which) a goof story. One year it was about archivists at the Smithsonian Institution running a project to put all published American audio onto wax 78s for posterity, because the day might come, hundreds of years hence, when the only way to listen to audio would be to run a sharpened rock over the grooves on an album. :rofl: It was fabulous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
68. Well, for one thing, I'm more of a rock fan than a jazz fan
But I'm lucky enough to have a grandfather that's still into the old swing and jazz. He's told me about such names as Jascha Heifetz, Glenn Miller, Tommy Dorsey, Johnny Long, Jan Garver, Duke Ellington, Count Basie, Chick Webb, Louis Armstrong, Les Brown, and Jimmy Dorsey (Tommy's brother.) I bet many today don't know the famous jazz players (many of whom played and didn't sing.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC