Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A quibble about 24 (no spoilers)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:14 AM
Original message
A quibble about 24 (no spoilers)
Chloe: I have Jack Bauer on the line.
Bill: Put Jack Bauer through immediately.
Karen: Jack Bauer had better know what he's doing.
Bill: I trust Jack Bauer implictly.
Jack: Bill, it's Jack. Audrey Rains may be a conspirator.
Bill: Why would Audrey Rains help the terrorists?
Jack: I can't believe it, but if Audrey Rains is guilty, we have to act now.
Bill: I've known Audrey Rains for years. I've never had reason to suspect Audrey Rains.
Karen: We have to act now to find out what Audrey Rains knows.

And on and on...

What's the deal? I know that soaps use dialogue to reinforce every character's name as often as possible, but several times in a single exchange between just two people? It gets to be a bit much.

I've worked with some people for years, and I've never referred to them by their full first-and-last names!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LisaLynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think it seems okay when you're typing it up, but ...
when it's said outloud, it becomes apparent that it's silly. :)

But, yes, that's strange that they keep repeating the names. They should pick either the first or last name and just use that. There are enough characters to keep straight without having to know their full name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, Orrex, I would have to say that's a very good point.
I hadn't really considered that, Orrex, thanks for pointing that out. Orrex, :yourock:

What I think is amusing is how we NEVER see him doing the mundane shit, like eating lunch or having a cup of coffee. It's always DRAMA, DRAMA and MORE melo-DRAMA....

You're right, Orrex, it basically is an action soap opera. :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musical_soul Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I was wondering something.
When does Jack sleep?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. He sleeps from 25 to 36
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Exactly!
welcome to DU, btw, musical_soul! :toast:

nice user name.... :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skygazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. It was about the third season when I had my epiphany
Namely that the show is a soap opera. Full of action and suspense but a soap opera nonetheless. Why else would Jack ALWAYS wind up sleeping with someone he works with (which most of us avoid in the real world and you'd think someone in his business would be even more careful about it) and why else would his wife/daughter/girlfriend always end up in peril and need to be saved by him?

Quite frankly, that's the part that irritates me the most. Can't they come up with a plot in which there ISN'T a helpless-female-needing-to-be-rescued lame plot device?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That bothers me every season.
Where I work (a company that has very few gunfights or nerve-gas incidents on-site), it is forbidden for people in the same department to be romantically involved, and they won't hire a parent/child pair. A married couple can work in two separate departments, as can a parent and child, but it's unbelievable to me that Jack and Kim would ever have been working out of the same command center. Ditto for Michelle and Bill. Ditto for Kim and Chase. Ditto for Michelle and Tony. Ditto for Jack and Audrey. Ditto for Jack and Nina. Etc. etc. etc.

But I still can't stop watching!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. And CTU always gets to the site of disaster ONE second too late
to catch the leader of the bad guys.
But I still love the show.


BTW: Think we'll find out next week if Jack is dead or alive???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC