Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

And the "Well, DUH!" Award for Scientific Studies goes to...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:20 AM
Original message
And the "Well, DUH!" Award for Scientific Studies goes to...
Harvard Medical School!

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/03/31/no_benefit_of_prayer_found_after_surgery?mode=PF

No benefit of prayer found after surgery
Some question science of heart patient study

By Rob Stein, Associated Press | March 31, 2006

WASHINGTON -- Praying for other people to recover from an illness is ineffective, according to the largest, best-designed study to try to examine the power of prayer to heal strangers at a distance.

The study of more than 1,800 heart bypass surgery patients found that those who had other people praying for them had as many complications as those who did not. In fact, one group of patients who knew they were the subject of prayers fared worse.

The long-awaited results, the latest in a series of studies that have failed to find any benefit from ''distant" or ''intercessory" prayer, came as a blow to the hopes of some that scientific research would validate the popular notion that people can influence the health of people even if they don't know someone is praying for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. In a related study
it was found that spitting into the wind can result in a damp and unpleasant sensation.

"So where did you find subjects for your study?"

"Well there was this other study next door on praying for sick people..."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Did they assume that at least five percent of all praying has an impact?
If we started from the hypothesis that a prayer might be answered depending both on the specific prayer request and on difficult-to-measure qualities of the person who prays, then would we expect a statistical study to provide evidence that prayer is effective?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Why would you start from such a hypothesis?
:shrug: Seems pretty random to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Given a hypothesis, how do we give it a randomness rating? e.o.m.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Forgive me, but are you being serious?
I can't tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think I'm being serious, but I can't be certain. e.o.m.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Conclusion: praying to the wrong god
...and is Vishnu pissed about it. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Blasphemy!! FSM will NOT stand for this!!
Be prepared for a noodly-appendage spanking later tonight! :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC