Post something that you find interesting

[ZombieNixon]

that other people find totally boring and pedantic. :boring:

If you key child objects in an itemized list in a skeleton structure, any operations applied to the parent object apply to the child object in the same way, except for rotations, because the object axes aren't synchronized.

[LynzM]

1. That was...

Almost about databases, and then it wasn't? You lost me! :crazy:

I can't come up with my own right now, but give me a minute... *grin*

[Ava]

2. the heart

no, not emotions, the actual heart.


yep, I'm a nerd. :P

[RevolutionaryActs]

3. You.

:7

:evilgrin:

:rofl:

[ZombieNixon]

4. Herk me.

:P

[RevolutionaryActs]

5. Hey you should be glad that I find you interesting.

Oh, herk yourself. :P

[ZombieNixon]

6. Oh, here we go...another threadherking...

:eyes:

:P

[RevolutionaryActs]

7. Fine, I'll go play with someone else.

:eyes:

[ZombieNixon]

8. Who else are you going to go herk?!

:grr:

:P

[RevolutionaryActs]

11. Why should you be jealous?

You don't even want to threadjack with me anymore.

[ZombieNixon]

12. Threadjacking does not equal threadherking.

No one can threadherk like Fleet Admiral Herkalicious. :P

[RevolutionaryActs]

13. I'm not at all sure how to take that.

:o

[ZombieNixon]

I guess "threadherking" means

to participate in an extended threadjack marked by frequent use of the word "herk." :shrug:

Or something.

[RevolutionaryActs]

15. Ok.

That works. :7

[ZombieNixon]

17. Of course, if you want it to mean something else, it could.

That's what herk is for. :D

[RevolutionaryActs]

20. No, no. That meaning is fine, just fine.

:o

[ZombieNixon]

21. OK...just thought I'd check.

:P

[darkstar]

9. The universe has no opposite.

Pretty herking heavy, huh?

[ZombieNixon]

10. I herk like that when I'm drunk!

:beer:

[rbnyc]

14. Hi.

I thought I posted that with enough humor that I didn't need to be made fun of...

...but there might not have been enough humor in the whole world.

;)

[ZombieNixon]

16. Huh? I'm afraid I have no idea what you're talking about, rbnyc.

:shrug:

Though I seem to have rubbed you the wrong way somehow and for that I must apologize. :(

[rbnyc]

18. You didn't rub me the wrong way.

I'm acknowledging a good burn.

Herk on.

[ZombieNixon]

19. LOL...OK, but I'm still kind of at sea here.

A good burn for what? What did you do? :shrug: :)

[rbnyc]

22. I just posted the most boring and pedantic detail

about myself, because it fascinated me, because I'm so self-absorbed. I thought there was enough benign self-effacement and good humor in my tone that I wasn't inviting much ribbing, but my tone is sometimes hard to get.

My thread was about sorting itemized lists for my child and for my husband and I, his parents. And I invited folks to post something more interesting.

So naturally when I see your post about child objects in an itemized list relative to a parent object 5 minutes later, I thought. clever burn.

No?

:loveya:

that other people find totally boring and pedantic.

If you key child objects in an itemized list in a skeleton structure, any operations applied to the parent object apply to the child object in the same way, except for rotations, because the object axes aren't synchronized.

[ZombieNixon]

23. OMGLICIOUS!

That was totally coincidental. The "skeleton structure" thing is a programming problem I've been wrestling with for the past few months. Whenever I try to explain it to people, their eyes glaze over and they start drooling, but I've learned a whole lot in the process.

I had no idea you posted that. I guess it was a good (albeit unitentional) burn.

:loveya:

[rbnyc]

24. You were karma's agent of well-deserved burn.

And it's all in good fun.

Weird tho.

:loveya:

[Heidi]

25. I'm crazy for art supplies.

Does that count?

[Starbucks Anarchist]

26. The patterns water makes as it flows along the gutter.