'Must Love Dogs' - a movie so bad it was physically painful to

[KG]

watch. glad my gf agreed.

sorry, just a got a DVD player and am catching up.

[Debi]

1. Thanks, I'm a Cusack fan and was planning on seeing it at some point

Now I know to delay it for some more time :hi:

[WCGreen]

2. It's not that bad.......

But it is pretty lame....

Well, actually really lame....

OPn the level of a Lifetime Movie with out the murder....

[hippiechick]

3. Very lame, but decent "I have nothing better to watch" viewing ...

:shrug: Guess I was partial to it 'cause my personal ads have always stated: "MUST LOVE DOGS".


:hi:

[WCGreen]

5. It was actually pleasent....

And I like Diane L. and john C.

[Iris]

12. I agree.

I thought it was a sweet movie.

[Maddy McCall]

4. KG, have you seen Memoirs of a Geisha?

[Shine]

6. Sadly, I concur....although I'll see anything with John Cusack in it.

:loveya: He's a dead ringer for my hubby...

[lizziegrace]

7. I read the book

then wouldn't see the movie. The book was dismal!

[LostinVA]

8. It wasn't that bad -- it was okay

The cast was great... the script wasn't. Diane Lane and John Cusack (esp. with a side of Stockard) can make anything watchable. It was a B-.

[Flaxbee]

9. I kept hoping it would get better... but it just seemed to fall flat.

And I really like both Cusack and Lane. But the movie just seemed really strained somehow. I can't recall the last Cusack movie I've liked.

[ncrainbowgrrl]

10. It was ok on a plane... with NOTHING else to do for hours and hours.

otherwise, I'd have to agree with you.

[nutsnberries]

11. predictable, stupid rom com. I saw it in the theatre for one reason-

and it wasn't to see Diane Lane.