I just installed Tiger on a G4 400mHz with 512 MB RAM - ask me anything!
Taverner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 03:01 PM
Original message |
I just installed Tiger on a G4 400mHz with 512 MB RAM - ask me anything! |
|
And yes I did - I did indeed.
|
no name no slogan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 03:04 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Why don't you get a real computer? |
|
And run a real OS, like WinXP? Those Macs are just toys. :popcorn:
|
Taverner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I actually use XP Pro exclusively - but we sell a Mac product, so install MacOS on a G4 I must....
|
LSK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message |
Taverner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
DS1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Tiger? On that box it should be called Arthritic Sloth |
Taverner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Edited on Mon Apr-24-06 03:08 PM by Taverner
But its not being used for any high end work.
Just running a backup program...
My biggest beef with both MacOS AND Windows is they constantly force you to upgrade....
Now Linux and BSD...you can always strip down if you have to.
|
no name no slogan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Linux and *BSD are designed to be as custom as you like them, which IMHO is the best part about them both. That and the no licensing fees thing is also really cool!
MacOS and WinXP are so monolithic that it's impossible to really get EXACTLY what you want on your machine. They both shoot for wide acceptance, so they're forced to aim for the lowest common denominator by default.
Although I do have to give Apple credit for using FreeBSD for OS X though...
|
Taverner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Albeit a very bloated FreeBSD |
|
That doesn't give you many configuration options out of the box - and if you try to strip out Aqua and use TVTWM and Xfree86 instead - fuggeddaboudit
|
RoyGBiv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
No kidding.
Just to see if I could do it, I got a stripped down version of Linux running a Pentium II 2/66 laptop with 64megs of RAM. And it all runs in memory.
|
Taverner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. I've been able to get Knoppix to run on old machines as well |
|
Knoppix is great for that...
|
RoyGBiv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
This was the first machine I'd tried with Knoppix that wouldn't boot, at least with a GUI. A minimalist version of Puppy Linux worked fine, though.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.