Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Professional Gambler Mugged/Beaten!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 05:02 AM
Original message
Professional Gambler Mugged/Beaten!
Well he was in the business.

What did he expect?

And he played the lottery!!!! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who was it?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't get it. Would someone explain the joke?
To me it reads like this:

- Someone got beat up.

- The same person bought lottery tickets.


Are lottery tickets valuable? Given the numbers of people buying them vs. crime statistics, why should it be expected? Why is there an inferred correlation causation? If this was expected, why then sarcasm when lottery? Is lottery somehow really different to normal gambling? Why would gambling cause bieng beaten up anyway? What The FUCK is this post saying? I'm wigging hard here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's sarcasm based on the "blame the (rape) victim" mentality
"She was a stripper for God's sake, what did she expect?"

"Strippers can't be raped"

"When a woman is in the business of selling sex, can we actually believe that she didn't want to have sex with those particular guys?"


etc, etc.


Therefore, if a guy is in the gambling business (and the lottery is gambling) and essentially giving his money away, can we realistically believe that he didn't want to give his money away to that mugger?


I've used a similar argument before but actually framed as a lawyer cross-examining a robbery victim. The lawyer asks the witness if he ever willingly gave money away before, to which the witness answers "yes". The lawyer then asks, "well then how can we believe that you didn't simply give the money away willingly to the alleged thief?".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I get it. I apologise for my literal mindedness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC