Please vote in my poll

[mdmc]

Poll question: Please vote in my poll

Whom will you vote for in 2004?

[bearfan454]

1. Dean can win

If we could only get him to talk about electronic vote stealing then we might have a chance.

[mdmc]

2. Dean

Kucinich
:dem:

[blondeatlast]

3. In the Primary or the General Elections?

In the Primaries, Edwards. In the General, the Democrat, and ONLY the Democrat.

[Kenneth ken]

4. I can't

vote in your poll. You don't have the option of "The Democratic nominee." At this point, I've no idea who that will be, so I can't pick.

[corporatewhore]

5. well i might not vote for the dem

in the ge becuase i live in prince georgies state and will try to split the conservtive vote by voting libertarian heheheheheheh i encourage my fellow dems living in repugnican states to do the same

[corporatewhore]

6. maybe it was a stupid idea

saw this on line though Buchanan more spoiler than Nader, in state-based analysis
The conventional view is that Nader cost Gore a victory, while Buchanan was not a factor, because Nader won 2.8 million votes to Buchanan’s 450,000. But the key question is which states were so close that third-party voters could have made a difference, had they instead voted for Bush or Gore.
There were 8 states in which no candidate received a majority of votes. In ME and NE, Gore won , so those are moot. In FL and NH, Bush won, but by fewer votes than Nader received .
In the remaining four states, IA, NM, OR, and WI, Buchanan’s vote total exceeded the difference between Gore and Bush. Combined, these four states account for 30 electoral votes, or one more than FL and NH combined. In other words, if Buchanan has dropped out and his supporters had switched to Bush, Bush would not have needed Florida to become president. "‘../askme/election_by_state.htm’"
Source: Davis Leonhardt, New York Times, p. 4 Dec 10, 2000