Why Saddam's Capture Confirms that Slinkerwink Should be our Nominee

[slinkerwink]

ha! ;-) That's the theme running right now in the General Discussion lounge......so silly, isn't it?

[La_Serpiente]

1. Hey, did you finish your report?

[slinkerwink]

5. yep, I did!

I'm working on another one.

[elperromagico]

2. I'll endorse you if I can get a cabinet post.

[FDRrocks]

3. Slinkerwink works for Ken Lay!

She was once an advisor to the PNAC and contributes to Town Hall! :)

Let the games begin!

[Cha]

4. If Dean's candidacy rested on or off the

capturing of sadam ...then it wouldn't be worth the mega bytes the site is printed on.

Have you seen the UK Guardian's article on getting sadam?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1107236,00.html
>snip< "It has suited the US to blame Saddam for the resistance to the occupation and to use him as a pretext for the continued occupation. But Bin Ali is merely confirming what the CIA and US Congress sources have recently confirmed: that there are no less than 15 organisations involved in the resistance, which enjoys widespread support. A recent CIA report admitted that, "there are thousands in the resistance - not just a core of Ba'athists", and concluded that "the resistance is broad, strong and getting stronger"."<snip>