Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Man With Faulty Penile Implant Has Had Erection For 10 Years

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 10:22 AM
Original message
Man With Faulty Penile Implant Has Had Erection For 10 Years
<snip>

PROVIDENCE, R.I. --A former handyman from North Providence who won more than $400,000 in a lawsuit over a malfunctioning penile implant may not get the money after a judge dismissed his claim.

Superior Court Judge Edward C. Clifton on Monday granted a request by the implant manufacturer's insurer to dismiss Charles "Chick" Lennon's claim, which his lawyers say will amount to $1 million with interest included.

The implant has caused Lennon to have an erection for 10 years.

The medical device maker's insurance company, National Union Fire Insurance Company, argued that since the device's now-defunct manufacturer, Dacomed Corp., can't be held liable for the device, it can't, either.

Lennon's lawyers responded on Wednesday, saying that the Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed the award and made it clear the insurer has to pay it.

Lennon received the steel and plastic implant in 1996, about two years before the impotence drug Viagra went on the market. The Dura-II is designed to allow impotent men to position the penis upward for sex, then lower it.

But Lennon, 68, said he can't position his penis downward because the device is faulty, causing him pain and embarrassment.

"I'm suffering with it right now," he told The Providence Journal during a recent interview. "It never stops. It's like a constant headache."

In 2004, a jury awarded him $750,000. Clifton called that excessive and reduced it to $400,000. In June, the Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed that award.

Dacomed had maintained that nothing was wrong with the implant. It filed for bankruptcy after the lawsuit was filed.

http://www.boston.com/news/odd/articles/2006/09/25/man_with_faulty_implant_may_not_get_cash?mode=PF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good lord.
TEN YEARS??? There's nothing pleasurable in that. That would be agony.

He should have gotten $1 million, actually. Priapism is a serious medical condition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh... he got the Dura-II
That design was flawed from the get-go. He should have asked for the Mega-studamatic super shot (with quick-release limp lever).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. And I thought
those warnings about four-hour erections on the Viagra commercials sounded painful...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. ok -- ten year boner aside -- another manufacturer
gets to skip off scott free for their malfunction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Of course. Corporations are designed only to suck in profits.
They are never liable for anything. Didn't you know that this is the new Republican economy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kmla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. Is his nickname "Woody" by any chance?
Just askin'...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. 10 years, eh? Not to hold it against him, but
couldn't he have mentioned something wasn't quite right sooner?

Or was he otherwise occupied? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skygazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. "Dacomed had maintained that nothing was wrong with the implant"
Yeah, except that it didn't work right. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
9. Forgive a rather graphic question
Is it actually erect in terms of vaso-congestiveness, or is it soft-and-forcibly-pointing-up?

Not that either would be much fun after ten years, but the former would seem even worse...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC