Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

They're remaking the Manchurian Candidate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
T Roosevelt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 09:44 AM
Original message
They're remaking the Manchurian Candidate
Unfortunately they seem to have missed the significance of the title:

http://us.imdb.com/Title?0368008

Plot Outline: In the midst of the Gulf War, soldiers are kidnapped and brainwashed for sinister purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BigMcLargehuge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!
Say it ain't so!!!!! THAT FILM IS PERFECT AS IT IS!!!!!

Someone needs to slap the execs in Hollywood around for a while... Maybe it will put an original idea in their heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. WHAT?!?!? *bangs head into table repeatedly*
Why? Why? Why? The original is wonderful...

THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE...set in THE GULF WAR?!?!?! :wtf:

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. That film can only be set during the cold war!
Who's bright idea was it for a remake?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Denzel Washington, huh?
Now, I :loveya: me some Denzel and Liev Schreiber (adorable), but...

um...the first one was fine....

BLAME THE ECONOMY, people!

The economy sucks so much, and the movie industry's numbers are in the toilet. So there's no money for new risky projects.

There's only money for doing what worked before, with today's stars.
That's why we're getting sequel sequel remake remake.

Yet another reason to dislike Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. at least, the new plot makes the bushies look like losers!
now, for my real reaction:
how fucking stupid to keep remaking classics!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. You KNOW it's Saddam brainwashing those Americans!
Edited on Fri Aug-01-03 09:57 AM by tjdee
Come on, LOL...you don't think that *Great Father Bush* would brainwash anyone?

What are you, some kind of commie pinko, LOL?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Geez....While we're at it...
......why don't we just remake "Citizen Kane" with Al Pacino ?
And "Gone with the Wind" with Madonna and Ben Aflack ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigMcLargehuge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. The Maltese Falcon with
Emmanuel Lewis, Gary Coleman, and the Olsen Twins...

Everyday I like Bollywood more (insert dancing girls here) because at least they try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bet they rip off Ebert's theory
Roger Ebert has long held a theory that Marco too was brainwashed to play a part in the events and that the Janet Leigh's character was his trigger.

It's kind of fun to watch it with that concept in mind but I bet they add it as a twist.

Bad, bad idea to remake this movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigMcLargehuge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. You know
that same thing came to mind when I first saw the film. I didn't read Ebert's review until later...

I always figured the communists were using Raymond to get rid of his mother because they knew she was a nutjob and the only way they could do it cleanly (she was a senators wife after all) was to a turn the weapon against her and that's what Bennet Marco was for.

Damn... Now I have to watch it again!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinayellowdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Wow, that makes sense!
From early on, I got the impression that we were being signaled not to trust the Janet Leigh character, and that she was part of the conspiracy. But since that was never followed up in later events, I figured it was just my imagination running wild. Even her name seemed fake somehow-- Eugenie aka Rosie. HMMM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigMcLargehuge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. "I was one of the original chinese workers who laid these tracks"
that line said it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chef Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
11. Candidate
Let's see. Exactly who is doing the brainwashing, and why. Saddam brain washes the Gulf War troops? Osama? Someone make some sense of this? I mean Bush and his cabal have already brainwashed the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leanings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
14. Who would be down
with a remake of "All Quiet on the Western Front"? This has been my Big Film Idea for years now. It's a classic anti-war movie and an excellent book, and you never see any WWI films. Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigMcLargehuge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. The two existing versions are quite good
the original with Lew Ayres is fantastic, albeit a little short. The second version with Richard Thomas is closer to the book but less visceral than the 1930 original.

I try and watch both versions whenever they are on cable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
16. If it is done well.
It is a wonderful idea.

The message of that film needs to be brought to today's audiences.

Is there a better rebuttal to that idiot's recent push of Joe McCarthy for sainthood than the John Eislen character?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. What a stupid stupid stupid idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC