|
Any fiction writers in here?
For the past two years now, I've been researching, brainstorming, and hoarding random ideas of all kinds for a proposed political novel of mine. I should have already finished this thing by now, but I keep getting stiff-armed in the proverbial gut by repeated discoveries that many of what I thought were my original ideas for situations, dialogue, etc., are not so "original", after all. Example: In November of 2004, I was reading Bernard Knox's introductory essay to his translation of Sophocles' "Oedipus Rex", and one, brief part of the essay got my attention immediately: Knox mentioned in passing the brilliant but reckless Athenian politician, Alcibiades, and how Alcibiades employed stirring rhetoric to convince the Athenian assembly to launch an ill-advised expedition to conquer the far-off Sicilian islands. This expedition ended in total disaster.
I thought to myself: "That's a great idea for my story! I can have a scene where someone in the book who's against the proposed invasion of Iraq but doesn't want to be seen as being "against us" recites the story of Alcibiades and the Sicilian Expedition as a covert way to argue against the invasion." I thought, 'Wow! What luck for me to be able to draw a parallel between the Iraq War and this other actual event, and to use it for my story.'
Then, today, I find out that I'm not the only one who's aware of the Iraq War's similarity to the Sicilian Expedition, and that several writers last year have already written about it, including one guy who's written a play.
So much for the "great idea". Now, anybody who reads my story won't exactly be impressed by the linking of these two events,
x( x( x(
This type of thing has happened about a hundred times so far with this story: fictional ideas of bizarre situation I dreamt up later turn to actually have happened in the news, either in the past or after I came up with the idea a year earlier.
Urghh, despair. Hard to get motivated to write the dumb thing. x(
|