Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rule: Something is no longer cutting edge if people are filing lawsuits over it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:23 PM
Original message
Rule: Something is no longer cutting edge if people are filing lawsuits over it
First Youtube, now this:

Burning Man dispute heats up with suit
Meredith May, Chronicle Staff Writer
Thursday, January 25, 2007


Burning Man tickets went on sale this month -- just in time for a lawsuit over who owns the name and logo associated with the annual end-of-summer gathering of 40,000 fire-loving artists in the Nevada desert.

Neon artist John Law, one of the event's three creators, who in 1990 helped relocate Burning Man from a San Francisco beach to a dry Nevada lakebed, is suing his two partners over the rights to the Burning Man name and logo.

Law's federal suit says he was defrauded of his one-third share of the Burning Man trademark's value over the years since 1996, when he left the organization. His two business partners, Larry Harvey and Michael Mikel, have recently tried to claim sole ownership over the Burning Man trademarks, violating an agreement between the three, Law alleged.

Now 48, the former Cacophony Society leader who used to host dance parties in Laundromats, scale the Golden Gate Bridge at night and crash the Chronicle holiday party with a posse of 100 Santas now wants the name Burning Man and its logo released to the public so anybody can use it.

If that's not possible, Law wants to collect on the creative capital he put into Burning Man -- whatever a judge determines it's worth.

"If Burning Man is really a movement, the name should belong to everyone, not three guys who don't get along anymore," Law said.

The controversy has inflamed the Burning Man blogosphere, where burners are debating on www.tribe.net and www.laughingsquid.com whether Burning Man should belong to the people, and whether public ownership means ushering in a world of Burning Man coffee mugs, T-shirts and "Burning Man Girls Gone Wild" videos. Some fear public ownership could spell a corporate death for Burning Man, killing its identity as an anti-consumer art community that has defined itself by sharing and outlawing sales of anything but ice and espresso at the event.

more

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/01/25/BAG9QNOQMB1.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC