Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

calling all gay girls---please take a moment and read this

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:22 AM
Original message
calling all gay girls---please take a moment and read this
if you go the hospital ER for abdominal pain: would you expect to be billed for a urine pregnancy test if you are between the ages of 13-50 (child bearing years)? this test would be done without your knowledge or permission...

please comment. i need some honest input here...and if i have offended anyone in anyway i apologize. it is truly NOT my intention.

also...talk to me about the words dyke and butch...:thumbsup::thumbsdown:

should i have titled this thread homosexual women?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. i'm not a gay woman
but I can tell you that ordering pregnancy tests for abdominal pain in women of childbearing age is extremely standard procedure, and for very good reason.

i see where you're going with this, but i honestly don't really see what the big deal is. those pregnancy tests without question saved lots of lives--ectopic pregnancies are really not that uncommon, and that's just one aspect of the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. please see post #3
thanks for your comments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. we live in a litigious society
if a woman dies because an ER didn't run a pregnancy test, someone's getting sued, not to mention that someone died for no reason.

without knowing the specific details of a case, one cannot make generalizations about this issue. it's a medical issue, not a sexual orientation one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. if the woman is walking and talking
or unconscious...

there is a difference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. I don't see your point at all
Could you try to explain what you are trying to say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:49 AM
Original message
if she can TELL me that there is no reason to run a pregnancy
test...then why should i run one?

if she comes in unconscious on a stretcher then i have to rule out everything with no help from her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
38. Because she might be wrong
It's not a question of whether you believe her or not--it is a matter of confirmation to rule out an *extremely* common reason for abdominal pain.

People get pregnant without realizing it all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. should the test be run before or after the dr sees her?
is it a "standing order"? should a "tech" do it or should a "nurse" order it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #42
46. It's a pretty standard operating procedure
techs don't order tests. At the end of the day, the attending is responsible for the patient's care.

Certainly it would be ideal for the doc to see her first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #46
51. well, techs are doing them where i work...
and just because something is 'standard operating procedure' does not make it right...

as you can see 'standard operating procedure' where i work would be wrong according to what you just posted..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Of course the techs are running the tests
that's their job. It doesn't mean they're ordering them. That would be illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. that is where the standing orders come in to play, right?
how do your standing orders read at your hospital?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #56
60. I'm a medical student
so I can't do anything right now without getting permission from a doctor first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #60
64. what about stroke protocol?
or any other type of policy and procedure?

short of breath? chest pain?

does your 'team' not have treatments and procedures automaically set in place for when these cases present?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #64
68. Certainly they do
and I've watched residents get screamed at because they didn't do full pelvic and rectal exams on every woman who comes in complaining of abdominal pain.

I am not an ER resident, though, and I rotate through a lot of different hospitals with different protocols, so I can't tell you exactly how it ought to work in every case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #68
71. i guess i just heard too much screaming today--
maybe i am just getting burned out:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #71
72. i hear you
I don't think ER medicine is for me for that very reason. It really doesn't have a very long career lifespan.

Anyway, you obviously care about the patients, so I'm sure you're doing a great job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #72
75. yeah, i care
but, i also question everything...

NOT good politically in this field...

better to tow the line and not make waves...

just do as you are told and follow standard operating procedure

status quo and cliques abound

i think i am ready to get a 9-5 mon-fri dr's office job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #38
99. She very well may be wrong. I know a girl who was
6 months pregnant and had no idea. She was in a car wreck and got knocked unconscious. When she came to, they told her they had to do an emergency C-section. She was freaking out thinking they had the wrong girl, screaming and trying to get up. Turns out, they didn't have the wrong girl at all of course. She delivered the baby and it is now in ICU with great hopes of living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #99
103. She may also be quite capable of knowing that risk herself
Women who don't sleep with men (to whom this OP was addressed) are not likely to be wrong when asked if there is any chance they are pregnant. Are we to assume that all women are just too stupid to know the answer to that question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #103
106. True, but had they not done the test, she and her baby
Edited on Sun Mar-04-07 12:56 PM by Shell Beau
would have been in grave danger. She was unconscious. So in that case, I think it should be ordered.

She knew she slept with her boyfriend, but had she been able to answer the qeustion, she would have said no to being pregnant. She was still having a "period". But if you are awake, and are 100% sure there is no chance, then I think the doc should go with what you say. Docs are also trying to cover their asses. They get sued quite regularly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #106
107. Ah - sorry - I missed the "unconscious" part
Way different story that.

I realize some women make mistakes. (And it truly troubles me to see so many here suggesting that women are likely to lie.) However, I also know that as a woman who stands 0 chance of being pregnant when the doctors ask, it pisses me off to no end when I see the damn cost of the test on my bills anyway. (Why ask if they're not going to listen to me?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #103
108. My favorite irony regarding this post
is that you probably had no idea that the majority of ER docs nowadays are women. I suppose they must be really self-hating.

Seriously--use your brain. No one thinks women are stupid (or they shouldn't)--but accidents happen and it is far better to double-check pregnancy status than it is to have a woman die because her fallopian tube exploded even though she didn't realize she was pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #103
110. The only way I'm pregnant is if the Holy Spirit has visited me in my sleep
Or if Haruka is hiding something really scary from me.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #110
111. Yes, Good Vibrations has teamed up with the local sperm bank to make...
the most realistic dildo ever.

I'm sorry I forgot to tell you about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #111
113. OH GREAT
Now I know why I've been craving ice cream and olives...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #113
114. Dude, you always crave ice cream and olives.
Oddly enough so do I. Along with half-sour pickles. I need to pick some of those up at Whole Foods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #114
115. Hmmm.... true
I'm eating Whole Food olives right now. And 85% chocolate... OMG! I AM PREGNANT!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #115
116. Oh goody.
Let's name it Queerspawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #116
117. OOOO -- love the name!
"Queerspawn Melissa Ellen Lostinva-Haruka3_2000."

LOVE IT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #117
118. Let's dress it in rainbows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #118
119. And little flannel shirts and Birks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #119
120. And give it a baby mullet and mini-power tools
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #120
122. *swoon* And a little wallet chain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #122
123. She'll be the hottest butch in preschool. All the straight toddlers will swoon over her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #123
125. Recruiting can never start too early
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #125
126. I was recruiting last night at Jude's 2nd b-day. Tons of little kids.
They loved the gerbil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #126
127. Did you remember to play the Indigo Girls CD?
Edited on Sun Mar-04-07 02:46 PM by LostinVA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #127
128. Oh yes, we had a sing-a-long to "Closer to Fine."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #114
132. I've been craving pickles (sweet ones) a lot too lately.
And I haven't been anywhere near you or any men in that way. What's up with the pickle cravings, I wonder? And yes, I have already had my head checked. The news wasn't good, but I persist in being funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #110
129. congratulations to you both, btw
:) Couldn't be happier for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #129
131. Thanks!
Sometimes within the next year, we'll both make honest women out of each other (that's a joke... I think).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #99
104. Something similiar happened to a former coworker's daughter
Luckily who injuries turned out not to be too severe and the baby is now a toddler, but my coworker came back from the hospital shocked. She had gone to the hospital worried about her daughter only to worry about her first born grandchild who was a couple months premature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. unless we believe in the possibility of spontaneous generation
then I don't think it's fair to expect a woman who knows darn well she isn't pregnant to pay for one. I have to pay for stuff like this myself, having no insurance. And the last visit to a local walk-in clinic (because I don't have a regular doctor) cost me five hundred dollars and still didn't make me any better. A hundred bucks for an unnecessary test is a lot of money for some people. A week's worth of groceries is a 'big deal'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. I hear what you're saying
but there are cases all the time of women who "know darn well" that they aren't pregnant who actually are. I recognize that this is unusual. I am just saying that from the point of view of an ER doctor, they are not doing their job if they don't cover all of their bases. And they are doing that for the benefit of the patient.

Who should pay for it? Well, I'm all for universal health care, so I think the government should pay for it.

It's truly a crime that you don't have insurance and have to pay such exorbitant sums for what I'm sure is sub-standard care. I really feel for you, but I stand by my assertion that this is a medical issue and that women of childbearing age with emergency level abdominal pain should be pregnancy tested in almost every situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. I would think in an
emergency situation that would be a quick rule out and they could proceed on to finding out what was actually wrong with me. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #29
40. Well, that's not how it works
or so medical school would have me believe.

*Confirmation* of pregnancy status is one of the first things that is run in a differential diagnosis of abdominal pain in women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. are you 'confirming' or 'ruling out'
Edited on Sun Mar-04-07 01:57 AM by wildhorses
or am i just arguing semantics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. i'd argue that's semantics
does it really matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #47
54. not really
i was just getting picky

but yes, i think there is a subtle nuance of a difference between

confirming...as in a positive connotation

and

ruling out...as in a negative connotation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. I think you're being a little overly sensitive about it
Particularly since one could argue that either word has more of a negative connotation for the hypothetical female patient if one really wanted to.

And really, as you say, it doesn't have anything to do with your original question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #57
66. i have admitted to being
'sensitive' about this...at this moment and time

can we agree to disagree on this minor and unrelated topic of discussion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #66
69. absolutely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #57
134. Say that next time you need stitches on your forehead and
instead get a finger up your ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #134
137. Did you read what my post was in response to?
It doesn't appear you did.

We were debating the hidden meanings behind the phrases "confirm" and "rule out"

The poster agreed that this was really just semantics.

So before you take a pot shot at me, at least read what I wrote, ok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #137
141. You still haven't answered my question either.
I know your type. Welcome to ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #141
142. What's my type?
Where have I been disrespectful or argumentative with anyone in this thread?

It seems to me that I am the only one being attacked here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #142
144. I think you have been right on and have only been offering the info
that you know! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #144
145. Thank you
I've honestly just been trying to be helpful--I don't understand the vitriol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #145
147. It happens! Especially lately!
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #40
45. then they can pay for it
I haven't had sex with a man in a very long time. There is no way in hell I am pregnant. Like wildhorses says, if I can tell them I'm not, they shouldn't charge a test on my bill just to make some quick bucks because we all know that is what they are doing despite how 'it' is supposed to work. I used to work for vets and I worked for good ones but there were ones in the area that would run every test under the sun just to make a quick buck. 'Standard'...yada, yada, yada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #45
50. ER docs work on salary
they aren't making any money off ordering that test. They are ordering it because it is a sound medical decision to do so. I don't really care if you believe me or not.

As I said in a previous post, I'm all for universal health care so that the government can pay for it. And in lieu of that, I hope some retched HMO pays for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #50
58. 'retched HMO'? Try retched HOMO, meaning my non-pregnant behind.
I don't have insurance, like I said before, and a hundred bucks is a lot of money to me. The thing that has always repulsed me about allopathic medicine is that 'sound medical decisions' need not be made with any input from the patient whatsoever. That's across the board, though, and not just limited to the discussion of whether a lesbian should be a) asked if she could be pregnant and b) believed if she answers in the negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #58
61. very good points made idgie
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #58
65. I don't entirely disagree with you, actually
Every patient ought to be as empowered as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #50
59. it is frustrating isn't it??
who and how to pay for what and when...

sorry, i am a little crazy...i just came off a 12 hr shift in an ER...we were pretty busy tonight and i am tired and just trying to understand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #59
63. hey, no worries
it's a legitimate question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #26
37. the paticular female presented with non urgent abdomianl pain
and on the triage system of 1-5...she was a 5...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #37
43. That's still not enough information
to make a definitive statement

As I said below, you are certainly correct that the woman should have been informed of the test, though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #43
49. thank you--
informed consent or something (i think that is a joke somewhere)

i understand that it should be definitive negative before she goes for x-rays...i just want to determine how we get there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #26
94. If I haven't had sex with a man in nearly 10 years...
why should I have to pay for a pregnancy test?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
98. I have had an ectopic! Very scary. That is the first thing I think they
want to rule out with a pregnancy. It is life threatening!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #98
109. It sure is
I really don't understand why some posters can't wrap their heads around this idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #109
133. because if you don't have sex with men
you can't have a pregnancy, ectopic or otherwise. I know, it sounds crazy, but...

Sounds like you're gonna be a great doctor, by the way, you've got the paternalistic condescension down pat. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #133
140. Thanks for the compliment
coming from you, it means a lot. I have been entirely civil throughout this discussion--there was no need to bring in personal attacks. I'm not going to alert on you, but I really think your last comment was pretty low. You don't know anything about me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #140
157. anyone who refers
Edited on Mon Mar-05-07 12:20 AM by idgiehkt
to lesbian women objecting to paying for a pregnancy test as having trouble 'getting their heads around' such a ridiculous concept needs to be shown that his future bedside manner may leave a little to be desired. By all means, hit that alert if you are offended. That's what it's there for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #157
161. I did not refer to lesbian women as anything
I was specifically referring to the obvious point that it is possible to be pregnant without realizing it. Life happens--even gay women are sometimes pregnant. Anything else you took from what I said is simply your own imagination.

You don't know anything about me or how I interact with patients. That you choose to make personal attacks on me for essentially no reason reflects much more on you than it does on me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #161
162. you insult
the women on this thread that disagree with you and someone points that out and you call it a personal attack? Mmmkay....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #162
165. Who specifically did I insult?
I said i didn't understand how someone wouldn't see why a pregnancy test is important in cases of abdominal pain. I don't see how that is very insulting to anyone. I don't make personal attacks on people (or at least, I try not to.) And I certainly never specified that I was talking about female posters, so don't you dare put words in my mouth.

You attacked me directly and I have not replied in kind. That is the beginning and end of it.

How about instead of flaming me, you consider for a second that my intentions are actually genuine. I won't hold my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #165
168. here's a nice one
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=105&topic_id=6263491&mesg_id=6264468

"seriously, use your brain" ???!!!

You don't see how smarmy and insulting something like that sounds...wow. It's even worse than your comment about women on this thread 'not being able to get their heads around' your reasoning on this topic. I suggest you spend more time on word choice and less time on whining about being personally attacked. As far as your intentions, I have no idea if they are genuine or not but so far you sound more like the problem in health care rather than the solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #168
170. You're right, I shouldn't have said that.
though the post I was replying to was completely off base and ignorant.

Once again, I did not say anything about "women posters" and I would respectfully ask that you stop saying that I did.

I never claimed to be the solution to anything. I do the best that I can.

In any case, I am doubtful that you are at all willing to see this from my point of view even though I'm trying to see it from yours, so I don't really see the point in discussing it any further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #170
172. here's the post
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105x6263491#6264473

I see contrast here between you saying on the one hand people can't 'wrap their heads' around your point of view, and on the other, you saying that you are trying to see 'my' point of view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #172
173. Ok, I can't help myself
Did I use any sort of word that suggests I was talking about female posters? No, I didn't. You put words into my mouth, plain and simple. Are you willing to admit that?

And just because I disagree with you does not mean that I am incapable of thinking about what you have to say, which seems to be a distinction between us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #173
174. lol
you continue to be insulting. You can't help it. I'm not asking you not to be, just to admit that you are and deal with the consequences when folks point it out. Btw, the majority of the posters on this thread are female.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #174
175. Cheers
:toast:

Have a good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have lots of women friends who are gay and are mothers
and have gotten pregnant and started a family while with their SO.

So, being a "gay girl" doesn't mean your ovaries don't work and you can't possibly be pregnant.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. please see post #3
thanks for your comments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
76. sorry lex...this was posted in the wrong place
i got confused...

hell, i stay confused:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. I went to the ER recently for something like that...
Before anyone ran any tests, they asked me what kind of birth control i use.

I told them none, and that i didn't need to, because i was pretty sure that my girlfriend couldn't get me pregnant.

The nurse laughed, and told me that made one less thing to test me for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. were you offended?
in any way by that conversation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. i looked at it as S.O.P., and i have a good sense of humor...
Plus, with some med 'professionals', it's just fun to throw them off-guard with candid information like that.

I am unapologetically "out" no matter where i am... for good, bad, or whatever...
here i am... deal with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. thank you...
you sound like a common sensical person with a sense of humor...very rare these days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. Thank you...
My sense of humor is what the gods granted me in place of burdening me with movie-star good looks.

Give my best to the Tar Heel State, would you... it's been a long time sense i was home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
62. ER nurses have seen and heard everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #62
70. and they don't believe half of what they see and none of what
they here...

what about the 5 month old baby brought in by his parents with a broken tib/fib...(in half!! mind you) and the parents claimed he fell 3 feet from the changing table...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Holy shit! I'm objecting to this re: medical bills right now!
I specifically told the doc there was NO CHANCE IN HELL I could be preg and STILL he ran a test (without my knowledge) that included a $96 preg screening. I find that sexist and unfair. I realize some women will lie or even not realize they COULD be preggers; however, I explicitly told him WHY I couldn't be pregnant and STILL I have to pay for this? I told him, I haven't had sex with a man in more than 3 years. I KNOW how my body works, there is NO chance I could be pregnant, there is NO NEED to run the tests. STILL I have to give up a whole day's pay because he didn't believe me. Not fair at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. please post #2 and #3 in this thread
thanks for your comments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Not understanding how posts 2 and 3 are meant to relate
but okay, whatever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Me either!
Good, I'm glad it wasn't just me, blonndee. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
74. i think i posted in the wrong place
i was getting confused trying to keep up with the thread, sorry:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #14
27. never mind then...
just look like they were talking from a different angle and i thought you might be intersted in another viewpoint:shrug:

just trying to keep an open discussion going...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
88. Precisely.
That's my take on that practice too. Dammit, a woman knows if she could possibly be pregnant or not. If a woman KNOWS she is not pregnant and that it is not even possible that she could be pregnant, she shouldn't have to pay for a sexist policy at any hospital. Like what I said below, how many men are forced into a prostrate exam for a severed foot or a cut on their forehead that needs stitches? None. It has been over 15 years and I still can't figure out what my last period at the time had to do with needing stitches in my lower leg. It made no sense that they stuck their cold assed gloved fingers in every hole before bothering to sew me up too. At some point, it's ridiculously sexist. Maybe it is about time doctors re-examine their SOP on medical issues regarding women, pronto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #88
138. I am so sorry that happened
Edited on Sun Mar-04-07 06:31 PM by idgiehkt
I thought you were just giving an example in the other post and now I see you are not. I had a doctor do a breast exam (completely incorrect procedure too, but I didn't know since I'd never had one before) on me when I was lying the bed with tubes stuck in me all over trying to recover from severe double pneumonia. In short, I was violated by him while I was deathly sick. It makes me think women should arm themselves with cameras every time a doctor comes in the room. What you descibed above sounds like such an utter and complete violation, and it makes me sick. I've heard many stories from women about being violated in some way or sexually molested by doctors and dentists. It's sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. this made me chuckle
I think 'lesbian' might have been a good choice but what the hey...

That is a sticky situation re: the pregnancy test. I don't know what to think about that. They are assuming that the female is both heterosexual and sexually active...I would think they should ask, really. I was watching a show on discovery once where someone they thought was a male came in and they couldn't figure out what was going on til they realized that she was pregnant and had no idea (she had other children, but years earlier). She didn't look that butch to me that they would confuse her gender but they did.

The words dyke and butch are more about personal preference, whether the individual lesbian thinks they are derogatory or not. I mainly hear them used by other lesbians. When used by people not lesbian a lot of times they are meant in a derogatory way so I maybe would just stick with lesbian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. thanks for your comments
i am so confused:crazy:

just trying to communcuate anymore is a like walking through a landmine...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. you might start
by actually replying rather that simply referring to other posts. i can tell you that doesn't come off that well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #18
78. just trying to get 'opposing' view points together
for the sake of a better debate...

i said at the beginning that did not mean to offend anyone:shrug:

idgie knows me...and would slap me down in a heart beat

and if i have offended you (again?) i again apologize as it is TRULY NOT my intention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #78
79. No worries
I can see that you have excellent intentions. I was probably being overly defensive.

I've had a long day too. And another one tomorrow, so I should actually hit the hay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #79
81. me too--
3rd day in a row...

good night:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm not sure why "gay" is important in this thread.
EVERYONE deserves equal health care, last I checked. Man/woman/gay/straight/somewhere in between/other.... Maybe I missed the point...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. And women (straight or lesbian) are capable of being pregnant.
nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. Yes. That is true.
I don't mean to be obtuse here... Have I missed something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. well, at least i got your attention
:shrug:

please see post #3 in this thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
32. OK. I see now.
Please understand; I wasn't trying to agree or disagree. I just didn't quite understand your OP right away.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. Actually, as homo-unaware as your post may seem,
I agree. I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #20
33. I * think* so too.
It just took me a minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #33
82. ---
:rofl:

class, are we all on the same page now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #20
80. i really just think people are people and try to treat everyone
with repsect...

i sorta went with the thread title in oreder to get attention..

if you knew HOW many of my threads have sunk with NO response...

if i had titled this

a study of urine pregancy tests...this thing would have sunk like a rock
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
17. Does this somehow tie into how docs are now supposed to treat all women as 'pre-pregnant'...
i saw a few articles and things talking about that months ago, and it just made me shudder.

That's how a lot of folks in the medical world see women, i guess...
Just baby-making machines; some in the "on" position, some on "standby".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. i am baffled
and scared...

if the person is coherent enough to get a medical history ...i can understand if they come in unconscious...you can't take any chances

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #17
34. Oh, come on
keeping in mind the fact that women of childbearing age could potentially become pregnant while making medical decisions is not at all the same thing as thinking of all women as baby farms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
25. As a sterile woman....
I would be disputing such a charge on my bills. I'm bi, but I do play with boys, too. The key for me (and the place where my situation is similar to yours) is that I'm permanently non-fertile, my husband is permanently non-fertile, and I don't play with anyone who is fertile, so when asked that question, my general response is, "only if there's a star in the east and three sheiks in the waiting room with a lexus, a stock portfolio and gold bricks." That usually gets them to listen to my actual medical records.

I have been billed for preg tests, though, and I disputed them with the hospital. The hospital ended up knocking them off my bill because I disputed. You might try that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. I know you're not talking to me, but you've reinspired me.
I got billed for a PG test, unfairly, I think. For almost $100, it's worth disputing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #25
53. I agree. I would dispute the charge. Write a complete explanation of the situation
Edited on Sun Mar-04-07 02:06 AM by Radio_Lady
and refuse to pay. It's the principle of the thing.

I'm 67 years old. GYN/OB techs still ask me when my last menstrual period was. I usually say, "The last one was in the Jurassic Period." Some of them understand and laugh, but some of them don't.

You do have the right to agree to or disagree with tests that doctors order. It certainly seems like "padding the bill" with a pregnancy test if you are not sexually active with the opposite sex.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liontamer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
96. to be fair, my mom had me after she was sterile
Mistakes do happen (in this case on her Dr's part.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
35. You can be gay and pregnant
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. this is true
and if you suspect you are...that is one thing...would you prefer to be asked or just have the test done without your knowledge and then billed for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. One thing I will agree with you about
is that the woman should certainly be informed of the test
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #39
48. I think there is no depth to human stupidity and ignorance
and that asking women if they could possibly be pregnant isn't the right way to go.

Compare it with the fact that a huge percent of men who self-identify as straight have sex with other men. :shrug:

Also sex-ed is often poorly taught, if at all, and many young women have no clue about their own bodies and how women get pregnant. In addition, there are bad things out there like rape and drugs that make you black out. Finally, people lie in front of parents and significant others all the time.

If I was a medical professional, I would cover all my bases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #48
102. I agree with you, but if it's CYA for the medical professional, they eat the cost.
If a woman signs a statement that she has been verified as sterile, or that she has no sexual contact with men or their sperm then saying no to the test should be her right. If the medical personnel insist, the cost is on them. Of course, if the woman is in no condition to inform them the prudent course would be to run the test.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #102
112. A few points
A) Having one's tubes tied is not a 100% guarantee against pregnancy. A hysterectomy is obviously a different story and I cannot see any reason why a pregnancy test would be run on a woman who has had one.

B) The "medical personnel" are ultimately ordering the test for the well-being of the patient and to make them pay for it is completely absurd. It would be like asking a mechanic to pay for checking your brakes. I mean, come on. There's no other profession where this kind of nonsense would get spouted. I certainly wish that we had universal health care so that the government would pay for it and in lieu of that I really hope that the woman has insurance to pay for it. But if it's an emergency situation where the life of the woman is potentially on the line, the proper tests need to be run, no matter what. That is simply a doctor's ethical and professional obligation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #112
121. Is it not the ethical thing to do to respect the patient's choice?
Edited on Sun Mar-04-07 02:33 PM by Gormy Cuss
Note that I didn't suggest that in an emergency situation, with the woman unable to make a coherent statement, that the test was unwarranted. If a patient is adamant that she does not see the need for the test than your ethical obligation is to make clear the consequences of not letting you confirm that.

And comparing the diagnostics that a mechanic uses on a car is just not relevant.

on edit: taking a stand that you should do the test in spite what the patient wishes, consider how many patients are distrustful of doctors and the privacy of information to begin with, add a paternalistic attitude on top of that and you'll see more problems, not less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #121
124. Sure it is
you are suggesting that a worker be forced to pay for his or her services--that is blatantly in violation of how our society works. Try suggesting that to unionized workers. Gov. Schwarzenegger wants to pay for health care in CA by adding a gross income tax onto all CA doctors' incomes. Your idea is simply a smaller version of that ridiculousness. The people who should be paying for medical tests are the same people who should be paying for all other social services--everyone who makes more money than they need.

Of course doctors should respect a patient's choice. And it is certainly the patient's right to refuse tests/treatment. In that case, though, they are also waiving their right to sue if something goes wrong.

You are also absolutely correct that the best course of action is to try to explain why the test is important. If a doctor runs tests without consent, he or she should be brought up on ethics charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #124
149. No I suggested that when a worker does unauthorized work there is no compensation for it.
That has nothing to do with any tax that Schwarzenegger wants. I'm suggesting that patients should be informed of the nature of the tests to be conducted and that the patient should be given the opportunity to say no when the test is an utter waste of resources. Several posters have written that they were given pregnancy tests without informed consent. If the patient was not given an informed choice,the patient should not bear responsibility for that cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #149
153. You're ignoring what I actually said
Edited on Sun Mar-04-07 11:08 PM by sir_captain
Nowhere in this thread did I *ever* suggest that any patient should be tested or treated against his or her own will. I have said the contrary several times. Short of a court order (or parental consent for a minor) that would be illegal and horribly unethical. If you think that's what I've been "defending" you have a reading comprehension problem.

As I have said several times now, I completely agree with you that it is the doctor's duty to obtain informed consent.

All I have been saying all along is that accidental pregnancies occur and it is in the best interest of everyone involved to confirm pregnancy status. That's it.

If I misunderstood what you were trying to say, I apologize for that.

That said, I did not attack you personally, and your implications about me and my professionalism are unfounded and childish. I wonder if you're a big enough person to admit that.

Edit: I read back over out exchange, and I suppose I can see how you misinterpreted what I said. I should have been more clear. I did not mean that tests should be run without consent. I meant that in the case of emergent abdominal pain, it is absolutely imperative that those tests get run, even if a woman doesn't think that she is pregnant. In order to do that, though, of course, it is incumbent to explain why the test is necessary and obtain consent. I hope I have made myself more clear this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #153
156. I did not attack you personally, and made no implications about you.
Attacking someone personally is against the forum rules and I do my best to abide by those rules.
Perhaps the syntax in post 121, where I used the informal 'you' pronoun for a generic situation rather than the less ambiguous 'one' caused confusion. Beyond that, I suppose that in the flurry of replying to various subthreads you may have confused my responses with those of others.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #156
160. Ok, fair enough. I apologize.
I think I did misinterpret your use of the word "you" and I'm feeling a little defensive since several posters have attacked me personally in this thread.

I don't think we really fundamentally disagree, actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
55. hm, 'abdominal pain'...i would expect whatever staff to pursue any reasonable systemic...
causes & remedies for such a call; i would think other diagnosis could be arrived at via urinalysis if not necessarily pregnancy i.e. some sort of digestive, organ/gland, or reflux disruption of some kind as well though of course i am no doctor

we're good friends with an internist, and his approach seems rather systemic in the overall sense; he also puts in ER time

though if a woman states that she is a lesbian...that would seem to eliminate the need for a pregnancy test on the face of it, and as a practical matter; unless of course her & her partner are pursuing 'in vitro' means as has been known to occur, if while other considerations are still in place lesbian or no :shrug:

though beyond it all, and what seems a practical matter as well somehow; hospital ER's are understood to bill for a host of services perhaps required in their attempts to get their heads around a malady that has presented itself to them otherwise unannounced

if i were in ER distress, or a loved one i.e. hubby, i would expect the medical folk on staff to apply what is in their means to do so in order to render remedy & relief :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
67. What I'd like to know
is how they justify charging 96.00 for a urine pregnancy test (I think that's the cost I read cited upthread somewhere). What do they cost when you buy one off the shelf these days (I can't remember -- seems they used to be about 10.00, but that was a long time ago)?

The whole cost of medical care has gotten ridiculous. It's assumed that insurance will pay for it, so charge whatever you want to (I know...I'm overstating) and the insurance industry will pay.

Eventually we all pay for it. And what about the poor people who are uninsured or underinsured? They still get the 96.00 pregnancy test, whether they need it or not because it's automatically requested. When I had my kids, there were things on those bills that I never even touched...it was a routine billing. And they charged as much for a single tylenol as it would cost to buy 2 BOTTLES.


And I apologize. This has nothing to do with the OP, I'm just a little frustrated with the whole medical billing process right now and I'm venting a teeny bit.

I'll hush up now and go back to my little corner and behave myself like a good li'l girl.

:hi:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #67
73.  I used to work in a medical lab that sold test kits for
Edited on Sun Mar-04-07 02:29 AM by idgiehkt
their specific tests. We had three price lists for each kit: one for if the kit was sold to the doctor, which was the cheapest, so he could charge the patient whatever he wanted for it, one for if the patient paid for the kit directly, and one for if the patient had insurance and the price for the kit was going to be billed to their insurance. So the price for a kit might look something like this

IgA test kit price schedule

A. $45.00 (doctor price) B. $200 (patient pay) C. $500 (billed to ins.)

I shit you not. It was unbelievable. And that was just a really simple test, not one of the complicated ones
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #73
77. I believe you.
I think it's criminal. It is. It borders on fraudulent. It's...it seems to me that that violates more laws than I can count, although I realize that it's done every. single. day.

And almost no one questions it. And that's the worst thing of all, I think.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #67
83. actually it has EVERYTHING to do with the OP
trying to understand the maze that is our expensive health care system...

and, this scenario i presented plays a minute portion in it....

good to see you:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #83
84. I don't think we're ever going to understand it.
It needs to be completely overhauled, from the ground up. And that's not going to happen any time soon because they're all making money. We're paying it because so many people were raised to believe that the doctor is always right and the doctor knows what's best and that we shouldn't question him.

Or her.

Thing is, if no one ever questions, then what's to stop them from doing whatever they want and charging whatever THEY feel is appropriate. Nothing. No one.

My son just got the bill from the hospital. You wouldn't believe it.

You just wouldn't.

Or maybe you would.

I don't know which is worse....



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #84
85. My last comments of the night.
First: doctors have not set prices on nearly anything in a long time. Once upon a time they did, and they made a lot of money, and they had way too much power over what normal people paid for medical services. That is not at all how it works anymore. You are right that prices are outrageous, but those prices are set by the insurance companies and biotech companies. You are blaming the wrong people.

Also, if you think that doctors aren't constantly questioned by every patient who comes in having read WebMD and thinks that they know just as much as the doc does, I've got a bridge to sell you. Don't get me wrong--patients should obviously have as much information as they can about their own health.

And finally, if you think that doctors all make too much money, I can assure you from personal experience that's not true with the caveat that there are some docs (just like in any other profession) who get paid tons of money. That said, I owe the government what will end up being $500,000 in student loans that I will be paying off for the next thirty years (if I'm lucky) for the privilege of working hundred hour weeks for $35,000 a year once I graduate from school. You will note that's barely minimum wage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #85
86. I'm not speaking of doctors specifically...
although I suppose I do use the word when I mean the medical industry in general which is wrong. And it's like any other profession in that you have the good, the bad and the in-between. I understand that a physician's office overhead is beyond what I can wrap my mind around, but so is 10.00 for an Advil.

Most of the problems that I have with the industry aren't with the physicians themselves, more with hospitals who do standardized billing and then add what the patient actually uses to that.

You go in to deliver a baby, you're charged for x, y and z -- whether they applied to your situation or not. Seems to me that there's a LOT of wasted resources.

And hey...your student loans are only a little bit less than the bill my son got.

:rofl:

(and reading that last, I'm tempted to take it out because it sound like I'm snarking, but I'm not snarking at you. Just strikes my funny bone right now. But then, it's late.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #85
101. Not to mention what you'll pay in malpractice insurance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #67
89. Well said.
Your points about the cost of health care, and how the uninsured suffer from those practices and how we all pay in the end for unneccessary medical exams are so true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
87. A woman can walk in with a severed foot and wave the foot
right in the hostital staff's face and still get a finger stuck up every hole, get asked questions about her last period and get a pregnancy test whether she needs one or not. In other words, no matter what is wrong, even hospital staff (i.e. doctors, nurses, educated people, mind you) automatically think it's a "woman thing." I have no fucking clue what is going on in hospitals, but their mentality is no better than the general public when it comes to treating women equally and fairly. For those who say it's not so, I wonder how many men go into an emergency room to get stitches for a cut on their foreheads and end up getting a prostrate exam BEFORE the doctors even look at the cut on their forehead. I'd be willing to bet none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #87
92. Drug Interference, etc.
At least, that's the reason I've always assumed I was asked about my last period before I went into knee surgery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #87
95. What if we all told them it was none of their business?
Simply refused to answer questions obviously irrelevant? I mean, my own regular doc doesn't ask me that if I go in for a tetanus shot or something. But it is a good idea not to go to the emergency room if at all possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #87
135. hilarious post, Jamasteine
Edited on Sun Mar-04-07 06:20 PM by idgiehkt
:rofl:

You are right and it makes me suspicious the whole thing is more about liability and the possibility of a malpractice suit than it is about concern for the female patient.

edit: and reading further on down the thread, I see that is exactly what it's about. Covering the hospitals/doctor's ass. So much for all the righteousness about concern for the patient. It is just cunning and mercenary instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
90. If it's not urgent - don't go to the ER.
If it is, expect to be ruled out for LOTS of things and to be charged a LOT.

I've had experience on both sides of this question.

Part of the problem too, is that there are plenty of people who LIE about their status because they don't want their S.O. to find out they've been cheating,
or they don't want to admit drug use, or whatever. Some tests are ordered standard based on that fact.

ER's are misused for all kinds of non-urgent complaints because so many are uninsured and show up there because they can. There aren't enough offices that will see uninsured patients.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #90
136. this sentence is a toughie
"ER's are misused for all kinds of non-urgent complaints because so many are uninsured and show up there because they can. There aren't enough offices that will see uninsured patients."

It's such a sad state of affairs. My only response is God bless the people that show up there thinking that health care a basic human right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #136
143. I believe that health care is a basic right.
But try working in an ER and you will feel differently about people who feel *entitled* to emergency care when they don't really need it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #143
158. lol
I worked in a surgery hospital for animals when I was younger...kind of an E.R. for dogs and cats. Nothing bothered me then but there is no way I could do it now, I don't have the stomach for it. I don't know, if I were getting paid I hope it wouldn't matter to me. But like you said, I really haven't been there. With animals it is different; if the owners can't pay, they get put to sleep. At least we don't do that to humans (yet). Or I should say, at least we don't do it actively. We pretty much do practive passive euthanasia with our healthcare system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #158
177. Animals appreciate everything.
I think that's one major difference.

That said, I think you are right about the passive euthanasia thing. And it's really sad that it depends on MONEY, not prognosis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
91. that happened to me once at a doctors clinic after insisting that i
hadnt had sex with a man for years (2-3) by then.

i like both the terms dyke and butch. i think people shy away from using butch only because it is used as an insult in mainstream culture. butch is a description of a particular look and an attitude. i describe myself as a dyke but not butch (because i am not).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippywife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
93. Having read all the posts in this thread
so far, I can agree that a test should not be given without informed consent when it is possible to obtain it. I have never gone into an ER with a physical injury (broken bone, etc.) and been given a pelvic exam so I don't know where that is coming from in Jamastiene's experience. I would raise holy hell before I would have even let that occur, to be sure.

The other thing to consider is that in the case of women, it is always important to ask whether they are or possibly could be pregnant as course of treatment, regardless of initial complaint, could involve drugs or diagnostic tests that could have an adverse effect on a pregnancy. I've often given a similar response as ThinkBlue1966: "If I am someone better contact the Pope!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liontamer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
97. I would expect a pregnancy test
true story: my friend is an ER doc. she had a patient come in with abdominal pain who claimed to not be sexually active, but who was actually in active labor.

Some patients lie, some patients are confused, and heck, some could have been raped while blacked out and really have no idea. :shrug: I think it's obnoxious, and really more applicable to teenage girls than adult women, but for someone in the ER it's better to be safe than sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
100. I don't know what the protocol is. But what I do know is that
patients will lie or otherwise deny the truth. My father is a retired OB/GYN who was sued while practicing in Canada because he believed it when a patient told him there was no possible way she could be pregnant. Long story short, she was and the baby died. Fortunately in Canada my father videotaped all his face-to-face consultations and the suit failed. For my father, lesson learned.

Just because somebody is a lesbian doesn't mean they can't be pregnant, obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mduffy31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
105. Wild, I am nurse not a doc but I can say this
I have worked with many docs in both ER and general practice that do have Dr. House's theory of medicine, Everyone Lies. Run the tests, your malpractice insurance is high enough already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
130. GREAT question wildwoman
Haven't got time to read the rest of the thread right now... but if I come into the hospital and tell someone that there is NO WAY I am pregnant, I would hope they would believe that.

My fave question if I go to an unfamiliar doctor is when they say are you sexually active? Yes.

What do you use for birth control? I sleep with women.

The responses are quite comical sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mentalsolstice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
139. What is the SOP for hysterectomies or elderly women?
Do all women over a certain age get a pregnancy test? What if you're young but you respond that there is no way you could be pregnant b/c of a hysterectomy? What if you're 70 years old?

In the case of a hysterectomy response, couldn't that be a lie inasmuch as replying that you're a lesbian? Wouldn't this be discrimination if one response was respected and the other not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UncleSepp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #139
146. Man, I hope I don't have to go to an ER... ever...
When I was 14, I went to the ER for what seemed like it could have been appendicitis. There was a huge argument over whether they were going to do a pregnancy test. I gave them the Jesus/You better call the Pope answer, as I had never had any kind of sex with any kind of person.

Now, I want to get a prescription for Accutane. Being that I have still got ovaries and a uterus, they're going to have to do a pregnancy test before writing the prescription, and one every month thereafter. I have been on testosterone for almost a year, haven't had a period since last March, and haven't had sex with a man since around July. There is no way I could be pregnant, but if I want to get a scrip for this painful nasty cystic acne that hurts so bad that it makes it hard to sleep except flat on my back, I will have to also get pregnancy tests. It's not quite the same as the ER situation, but it's similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mentalsolstice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #146
151. Certainly, many could get stuck with the extra cost
Transexuals, definitely, as with any other woman. How are they going to know you're not lying if you tell them you're not having sex with men, or you don't have the requisite parts (or they're not functioning). However, I'll be damned if I'm going to get stuck with the cost of a pregnancy test...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liontamer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #146
154. that's odd
my dr give me medication without running a pregnancy test. Granted it wasn't accutane, but lot's of meds can cause birth defects. Weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #154
167. Accutane causes especially severe birth defects
though I can certainly imagine how constantly being tested for pregnancy would seem violating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mduffy31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #139
152. I do believe that it was a question of women of childbearing age
and a woman in her 70's is not someone of childbearing age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
148. How about this one - going in to the ER bleeding profusely, presumably undergoing a miscarriage...
and being asked by the attending personnel if I was "sure" I was really pregnant to begin with.

Yes, thank you, the blood test confirmed it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
150. Three words: DATE RAPE DRUGS
My little sister was raped years ago and had no recollection of it. No soreness, no symptoms. Fortunatly for her, Mr. Perv Rapist was a friend of a friend and had both a big mouth and a thing for taking pictures. Word got back to her, she put two and two together, and called the cops. Cops found the photos, and he ended up spending 3 years in prison.

Had it not been for his big mouth, she'd have never known they'd had sex. Lesbians get raped just like hetero women do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #150
159. what a pleasant reminder
the truth its, this all boils down to lawsuits and the hospital avoiding liability. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #159
163. Yes, well, I suppose with the way malpractice
works in our country, you could say that about every part of every single patient interaction, couldn't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #163
164. I'm sure the bases
are covered, just like this one is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #164
166. Well, as I said, there's an element of truth in that
but it is also true that definitively determining pregnancy status is simply a good *medical* decision.

Can we at least agree about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #166
169. If I'm conscious and they ask me
and I am not believed, I'm gonna be insulted and I'm not gonna pay for the test. I don't believe it's about a medical decision, I believe in this case it's about medical malpractice liability. That is how I feel. We can agree to disagree, is how I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #169
171. My last post
Believe it or not, I can see why you would feel insulted, and if I were you, I'd probably complain too.

I will simply say for the last time that wanting to run the test is not at all because anyone thinks a woman is lying.

I'm sorry you don't believe it has anything to do with actual medical reasoning--as you say, we will have to agree to disagree on that point, and i'm fine with that. Just so you know, in most emergency rooms, as opposed to in a private doctor's office, the doctor is on salary and the hospital covers malpractice, so decisions tend to be made more with medical reasons in mind.

Anyway, have a good night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #171
176. I've not said it's because they think she's lying
I've said it's because they are avoiding the possibility of a malpractice suit. Lol, thinking she's lying is actually a step up from implying she might be and not even know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dastard Stepchild Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
155. Short answer: Yes...
Mind you, I am bi, but I generally don't proclaim that to the doctor or nurse. So if I went in with abdominal pain and was asked to give a urinalysis, I wouldn't necessarily guess that I would be getting a PG test, but it wouldn't surprise me to find it on the bill after the fact. Since, as you mention, I am a female of childbearing age and did not disclose the gender of the last person I had sex with, I would think that this would be almost standard procedure for a woman presenting with abdominal pain.

And, if it bothered me after the fact I would dispute it on the bill. I'd let them know I was in a same sex relationship and that there is no way I could have been PG, so I want the charge removed from the bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #155
178. short answer yes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC