|
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 08:02 PM by dropkickpa
by the Pens because Isle of Capri didn't land the license.
Rendell had the strongest ties to Harrah's (Station Square), so there's a straw man on that one. Ravenstahl is abiding by the SGB decision for what's best for the city (not to mention the substantial amount of resistance by Hill District residents to the IOC plan).
BUT, having read over the decision papers released by the state gaming board, I have to say, I agree with the SGB. IOC keeping the Pens in Pittsburgh was not quite as done a deal as many would believe (Basille jumping ship on buying the Pens is one example). What, because Mario jumped in bed with them (poor business sense in my eyes, it wasn't a lock), they were supposed to get the license? I do not think that should have been the deciding factor, and I am glad it wasn't. PITG has been projected to bring in substantially larger revenue to the state than IOC.
IOC's plan was a further gutting of the Hill District (the first stage of which happened when civic arena was built), and I do not think plopping a huge casino complex smack dab in a residential neighborhood is responsible. There of course would be an area directly around the development that was swinging towards upscale, but, as happened in Columbus around Nationwide arena, the original residents of the area will be pushed out, further marginalizing them. This type of development does not benefit the current residents, they will not be doing any better, they will just be pushed out of their homes in favor of money-flush newcomers, who will not be doing anything for the Hill, I guarantee you.
Don't get me wrong, I love the Pens and want them to be here forever, but I don't think the IOC plan was the best one for the city.
|