|
In the early- and mid-nineties, I worked in a cancer outpatient center. Cancer, being a most indiscriminate villain, attacked old and young, male and female, attractive and... not-so-attractive. I assisted many patients of both genders in undressing and redressing themselves. And I readily admit that many of the patients were quite attractive.
That bit of a qualifier being said-- I quickly learned (as did all my co-workers) that once we put on the white lab-coat, the libido gets turned off. Period. Regardless of the wishes of the patient, we maintained our decorum as soon as we walked into the building. Eight hours of "gestalt starvation" as it was called, was a small price to pay to work in such a wonderful and caring environment.
I've had patients (and the daughters and mothers of patients) come onto me and to the last, we maintained that it was simply not a good idea to involve oneself with a patient or their family members (in the context of the relationships being discussed in this thread) until at the very least that patient had finished their course of treatment.
My point is... a person can easily brush aside notions of sex and/or passion when they are determined to, regardless of location or time. It's our choice (and responsibility) to respond to or deny those feelings. Many people, not only teachers and cops, are tasked with positions of authority or responsibility into which passions have absolutely no place.
Taking your last statement ("If nothing else, it should be, simply, a matter of professional ethics") just a bit farther-- it's a matter of personal ethics also. In many instances, sexual advances may not be illegal or even against company policy, but that does not cover up the fact that we, as people have a responsibility to maintain ethical behavior, common decency and respect to everyone we encounter, no matter where we are.
|