oops dupe

[matcom]

[slj0101]

1. And how is that different from a communion wafer?

At least a chocolate body of Christ is tastier.

[bicentennial_baby]

2. I kinda scooped ya, d00d

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105x6363244

:D

[baldguy]

3. But butter lambs are fine.

[emad]

4. My Sweet Lord rumpus

Manhattan, NY - (Ass Mess): "Maybe they shoulda used carob!Helluva lot cheaper. No lacto-allergens, calorie-friendly, rich in organic nutrients. And unlikely to deprave.

"Just cos there's no loincloth don't mean nothin'. Some perv gonna break off the phallus? Gobble it up infront of six year olds? Says who? The Pope? He sure knows all about that!"
http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s2i16789

[YankeyMCC]

5. I'm having a hard time understanding the objection

Images of a suffering Jesus are common and well accepted among believers and so is the concept of 'eating the flesh of Jesus' symbolically or literally. It seems creepy to me but I suppose the fact that its chocolate will attract children which I would think most xtian churches would applaud.

Sure the hotel probably isn't doing it out of some spirit of bringing the word to people but it certainly doesn't appear to be an intent to mock in fact that would be pretty silly of them from a business perspective.

So why not embrace it to your advantage if you're a xian since fundamentally it doesn't seem to violate fundamental beliefs and practices of xians?

[mainegreen]

6. Oh god, another one!

:rofl:

[matcom]

7. oh no!

:scared: