Question: Can anyone corroborate this? I'm not sure if this is true.
In violation of Texas law, Wal-Mart has been taking out life
insurance policies on its employees without their knowledge
and naming the company as beneficiary. Another prominent
user of these "dead peasant" insurance policies is, you
guessed it, Enron. The difference between the Enron and
Wal-Mart in this matter is that Enron didn't break Texas Law
as did Wal-Mart. In Texas, it is illegal for any person or
company to take out a life insurance policy on any other
person without telling the person first. Wal-Mart chose to
ignore Texas law when it took some 350,000 dead
peasant policies on employees, including Texas
employees, without telling them. The arrogance of
Wal-Mart in purchasing these policies in defiance of Texas law
is almost beyond belief. Moreover, the proceeds of these
policies have reportedly been used to fund executive
retirement plans.
The ghoulishness of this practice speaks to the utter
disregard - indeed contempt - that Wal-Mart holds for its
"associates". Executives enriching themselves on the
death of their employees. How low can one sink?
I wonder how secure Mr.Coughlin and the rest of the
executives and directors of Wal-Mart would feel if
Wal-Mart employees started purchasing life insurance
on them without their knowledge. Do you think it might
give them cause for concern? There's a reason the Texas law
exists. And, there is need for a similar law at the federal level.
Conclusion: Wal-Mart is a company without a conscience. If
Wal-Mart was a person, the terms "psychopath" or
"sociopath" would apply. But Wal-Mart is a corporation, an
"artificial person" under the law. So, in Wal-Mart's case, there
seems to be a "collective psychopathy" on the part of its
directors and executives. It's time for the Texas Attorney
General take steps to control this monster.
http://www.walmartworkerstexas.com/death_and_money.htm