|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
![]() |
CatWoman
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 09:36 PM Original message |
Wow!! Did Heather Mills step on it (link disclaimer) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. I know this is Sunday, but your subject line could use a NSFW warning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 10:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
15. what's "NSFW"?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 10:17 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. NSFW = 'not safe for work' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fizzgig
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. this really needs a disclaimer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Droopy
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. She could have just said, "Yup, I did it." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. I saw boobies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 09:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. And a sequel for "Indecent Proposal" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
5. And I thought "step in it" was a reference to dog poo on the sidewalk... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 10:14 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. no -- she stepped "on" it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 10:14 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Gotcha. And the evidence is rather pronounced, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SPKrazy
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
6. boobies alert!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 09:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I've got the perfect song for that: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
9. garters look so silly like that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 09:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. And her hair didn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 09:57 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. her hair was censored |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 10:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. do tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
12. Oh my God! Oh my God! I saw boobies. Oh my God. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Brad
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
13. Now I understand why she asserts she was never a porn star |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
14. Wow, that's the least sexy nekkid picture ever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Well then, post your pictures if you think you can do better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 11:06 AM Response to Reply #21 |
29. I certainly have done better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fran Kubelik
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
20. um |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
22. I don't know how you can be sure that is her. So many girls like that look |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fudge stripe cookays
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
23. Dayum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 11:37 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Yep. I've been wanting to marry Paul since I was about 8, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 01:08 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. maybe you can have his son |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skygazer
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
24. Ick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mugu
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
25. She may be a gold digger, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amerigo Vespucci
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
27. These are the most explicit photos I've seen of her to date, but not the first... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maccagirl
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 02:08 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. The Eastmans were not related to the Eastman-Kodak family |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoddessOfGuinness
![]() |
Mon Dec-03-07 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
28. Yikes! I'm glad my kid wasn't around! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC