Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cameras

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 09:46 AM
Original message
Poll question: Cameras
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. ok....someone should have posted about their camera....
......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. er..that was me. 8X10 Toyo
I didn't want to brag about size. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I don't even know what that means...
should we both be embarrassed :D :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
43. I'll show you ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #43
58. is that like an antique of a camera that still works ..?
and is that what a picture taken with the camera looks like? so yeah .... :blush: <--me--> :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
52. I used to use a 4 x 5 Calumet, but that's not even in the same league.
I did small products with it.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueraven95 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. I voted canon
but I'm not going to say anything bad about nikons, which are totally and completely fine. I'm just more comfortable with my canon.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. thanks...
I need to look at Nikons. I just like the way Canon feels in my hand. Is one more "left handed" than another?

:shrug: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueraven95 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. I don't know, but
I'm left-handed and I agree, the canon is more comfortable. But I also learned on a canon, so that might be it. :shrug:


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I haven't learned on anything
:D :blush: I just know that it feels more comfortable in my hand. I need to hold some more Nikons.

I think R&D and engineers hate left handed people :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueraven95 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. yep,
I can't tell you how many times I've wanted to curse an R&D person. Damn right-handed tools! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Everything they produce is upside down and backwards!!
:silly: :crazy: :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueraven95 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. especially can openers
I know I should just go electric, but it seems like such a waste of electricity. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Somehow I got the hang of a manual can opener...
It helped me to have a really good one. I have a Kitchen Aid:

Looks like this one (I think this is anewer version, I have mine for a couple of years now)

http://www1.macys.com/catalog/product/index.ognc?ID=177276&CategoryID=31844
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueraven95 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. cool
I have one similar in design to that, but cheaper. I can get the can open, but I have to think about the physics needed first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
54. I'm a lefty and love
my Nikon though nothing bad to say about Canon. I like how it feels but I like a camera with some heft to it, just feel sturdier. I also like the controls since there is no having to push a separate button to adjust both aperture and shutter speed. Quality wise there isn't much difference between the two. How it feels in your hand is very important so I would say if the Canon feels better go for it.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #54
56. thank you for saying that...although to be fair to the Nikon, I have not
had much handling of those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Canon Powershot
I loves it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thanks. --
Do you mind to tell how much it cost?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I don't know as it was a gift.
It works very well though. It's kinda hinky with the zoom sometimes though and I'm not sure why, but it's possible that reading the manual might help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. that reading the manual thing...
what's up with that anyway? :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I used to bother...
but now I'm just too busy for that.

And by busy I mean impatient. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakefrep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. Other - Konica Minolta
It's a perfectly good Maxxum 5d - but finding accesories is getting tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. Pentax K10D.
It's a bit heavy but has a lot of cool features, many of which I haven't figured out yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. Does it have night capability?
Longer exposure, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Yes, though I haven't tried that yet.
One other thing I like about it is that the body is designed with seals that make it fairly water-resistant so it can get wet (not submerged) without being damaged. Since I take it with me when sailing this is a nice feature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. that is cool...will it take pictures underwater?
I used to Scuba so that might be a plus :shrug:

If I ever scuba again :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. No, it's not an underwater camera. Just water-resistant
so you can take pictures in the rain or somewhere you might get splashed, like on a boat. Underwater cameras are REALLY expensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #39
59. ok thanks...rain shots and boat shots would be FUN n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. I like my Canon with one 'n'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. oh yeah...
Edited on Mon Dec-15-08 10:56 AM by Tuesday Afternoon
typos and no caffeine

too late for edit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. In the positive side, you didn't write camera's
like most people do :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bikebloke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
16. I like my Panasonic FZ-5
Nice zoom and great image quality. And not so big that I wouldn't want to carry it around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yes, Bulky can be a problem. Thanks.
Really small cameras scare me though. Afraid I will lose it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
19. I have a newer Canon digital I love, but honestly my old Olympus OM-1
is pretty good for what it is: a nigh-indestructible tank of a manual camera with relatively cheap but high-quality lenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. I used to have one of those.
My ex has it now. Good camera, took good pictures. But it's nice not to have to buy film any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
62. I need to go digital...thanks
NEED it with the want of burning desire :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #62
69. yeah - we finally broke down and got a digital Rebel
and it is really nice. And after the initial investment, it's sure nice to not have to bother with film cost/development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #69
70. what about printers...
that is a whole nother category. But, yes, the cost of film and developing, sheesh...I could've bought the camera already :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. sadly, we almost never print
although we were just talking about that, how we sometimes miss having actual photos to pass around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #70
85. One of the nicest things about digital
is being able to send the photos over the Internet to be printed.

I send mine to the local Walgreens and pick them up in an hour for $.19 a piece (4"x6".) If the photos are for somebody else, I just route them to the Walgreens closest to them. This last summer, I shot photos at a wedding (I wasn't the pro, just an attendee), routed them to a Walgreens within a few blocks of the reception hall, and gave the photos to the couple at the reception.

The very best thing about digital is being able to shoot photos at will, deleting what you don't like, and then editing for your personal taste. The other morning I shot 217 photos at my bird feeder in less than 8 minutes (while heating my breakfast.) Of the 217, I printed only 4, but they were grand photos.

Regards, Mugu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #85
86. well...that is really good to know !!
:bounce:

I know I will be a better photographer and painter if I had a decent camera :hug:

thanks Mugu :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
20. Leica Digilux 3
Edited on Mon Dec-15-08 12:09 PM by primate1
Okay, so I don't actually own it, but man, would I love to!



I'm actually rocking one of these bad boys:



Oldschool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. I would probably be estactic with either one! What is it that you
especially like about the Leica Digilux 3?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #32
50. Leica just has a really really good reputation for quality.
Edited on Mon Dec-15-08 03:11 PM by primate1
I'm probably going to start saving for a Nikon D90 soon though, because of its video capabilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. rosewood, brass and steel
4x5 zeiss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. what is that?
:blush: :shrug:

Is that what you use to take those pictures of Mo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
23. I own a Canon,
but believe that I would be equally happy with a Nikon. My decision was based mainly on having owned Canon before and being pleased with it. I decided what glass I wanted and bought a camera with the money that was leftover. I figure that the glass should last for the rest of my life, but I will probably own several more cameras.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Hey, I am glad you stopped in...
You are a Professional, right? Does glass = lense :shrug: :blush:

all those pics from my thread were taken with disposables :yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
46. yes. but don't be a douche, and drop the e on the end of lense
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #46
55. pfft --
when I get a real camera I will do better, I promise. Care to contribute to the cause? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
47. I'm not a pro.
I've never sold an image. I'm just a guy that likes to take photos.

Yes, when I said glass I meant lens.

Sorry it took so long for me to respond. I was attempting to get a photo of a match lighting and wasn't paying attention.

Cheers, Mugu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
33. Nikon
Nikon D100 (got it on ebay for a steal)

I'm just learning the photography stuff. I like the photos I've been able to take with it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. That is really nice. Subdued coloring and I like the composition.
~sigh~

Here is a kitty pic taken with a disposable:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Aww, I like that kitty photo
and there you go, using fancy photography lingo "composite" and "subdued coloring" x(

I just aim and shoot. :silly:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. meh...
I am a painter at heart, so I understand that aspect of it. :D
The technology is what scares me :scared:

That point and shoot thing seems to work for you ;) Don't knock it :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. The technical stuff is so over my head
I like it when I download and find I was able to capture what I saw - I'm pretty simple minded.






thank you for the words of encouragement :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #45
57. that is gorgeous...it looks like a painting...
Edited on Tue Dec-16-08 12:34 AM by Tuesday Afternoon
did you mess with it any?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #57
60. thank you, that one was a point and shoot
Edited on Tue Dec-16-08 12:52 AM by merh
I had been feeding them and they were all over the place, I got lucky with the laughing gulls.

on more point and shoot - a surrise I had to capture

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #60
89. that is lovely ...
do you know anything about exposure? I guess your camera automatically figures exposure time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #89
91. It does fix exposure time when I have it set to.
I think I can use it like a manual camera, I did that with the lens the other day when the camera wanted to focus on the closest item and I wanted it to focus on one further away.

I'm still learning how to use it and I would love know more about exposure and the like.

thank you again for the kind words about the sunrise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
40. I have a Sony, but I am not going to brag. We bought it
because it is compatible with all of our other Sony equipment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. I bought a Sony a couple of years ago. I gave it to my Mom...
Edited on Mon Dec-15-08 01:28 PM by Tuesday Afternoon
It did not have all the features I wanted and it was too small in my hand. It took an okay pic though. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. I dig my sony a100...
Am looking forward to an a900 by this summer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #44
79. The pictures you post here are made with this camera?
I like your picture threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
48. Olympus Digital SLR - Nikon pocket camera
Love them both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:23 AM
Response to Reply #48
63. good to know, thanks
:) :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
49. Nikon D80 and Coolpix that is several years old.
The D80 has a 18-80ish Sigma zoom lens. Also, it has two fixed Nikon lenses: a 35ish mm f/1.8 and a 20ish mm f/2.8.

Also, I have a Pentax SP1000 35mm with a non-functioning light meter, several screw-mount lenses and filters.

I have a Kodak "Signet 40" 35mm with filters. (flash bulbs are no longer available)

Vivitar rangefinder 110. (film, batteries and flash cubes are no longer available.)

Minolta Weathermatic waterproof 35mm automatic.

My Sweetie (DU name "Gizmonic") has a Cannon AE something SLR that is really nice. She has several lenses including a cool Tammeron 28-80mm marco-zoom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #49
64. You guys are set and good to go
wo0t :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SacredCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
51. I have an Olympus Stylus 770...
Waterproof (took it snorkeling in Key West), Shock Proof- and takes pretty good pics.


I also have my old Nikon FA 35mm, but haven't used it in YEARS. It was a fantastic camera, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #51
61. I bet the Olympus was expensive... I asked someone up thread
about underwater capabilities and that is what they said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SacredCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #61
68. It wasn't outrageous expensive....
Just shy of $300-ish when I got it. But it takes underwater snapshots- it's not a REAL underwater camera like the old tried and true Nikonos V of old. I think it is only rated for about 10 feet or so of depth, so it's more for snorkeling and taking pics of your kids in the pool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
53. Nikon fan here!
I just bought a Nikon D-60 this summer with a couple nice lenses and am very happy with it. I just have always been around Nikons and am comfortable with them. We used F-2's and -3's for documenting work in the field, and they were always reliable, except when my boss backed the Suburban over the camera bag.:rofl: Hey, I didn't put it there! Anyways, I agree with The Canon users above. They are both good brands, with good selections of accessories and support for their products!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #53
65. thanks for the info
and the funny story :) :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
66. Have a Canon EOS XSi; like Nikons, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. Those 2 seem to dominate the market...thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heathen57 Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
67. I voted Canon, but that is for digital
for the film format I have a Minolta SRT 201 which is a real dinosaur. Fully manual and the only thing that has a battery on it is the light meter. I drug that through sand, over rocks and in all kinds of weather. It was used when I got it, and it still works. (Needs a good cleaning though)

I also have a Minolta 700SX (?) I can't check the model # right now since it is in the bedroom and you NEVER wake the wife for something like that.:grr:

Anyway, I've had that one for about 20 years or more and it still gives great service Will take great night shots (I used to take the balloon glow).

I was pulled kicking and screaming into the digital camera age with my Canon Rebel XTI and after I got a decent tele lens, I've been very happy with it. I shot my niece's wedding with it and didn't have a single problem in over 800 shots. But it has features that I'm still learning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #67
73. That Rebel is user friendly, IIRC. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
74. I'm very happy with both of my Kodaks.
Never even tried another digital camera, much less owned one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #74
77. Kodak, eh? Who would've thunk it!!
How are they price wise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #77
81. At regular retail, they
Edited on Tue Dec-16-08 01:21 PM by Zavulon
were about the same as their Canon and Fuji equivalents, but they seem to go on sale more often than Canon does. I got an eight megapixel Kodak which normally ran for $159 and paid half price for it new about a year ago.

When that Best Buy insert hits your Sunday paper, there will probably be a deal on something Kodak. I still carry my five megapixel model around everywhere, it's been banged up like a cheap Timex, and it still works perfectly.

On edit: BTW, I've recently learned that you can often save a lot off of retail with digital cameras (more so than with lots of other products) on eBay. That's how my sister is doing her camera shopping this year, and she went Kodak too before we even talked about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #81
82. Ebay...yeah. Thanks.
Edited on Tue Dec-16-08 01:26 PM by Tuesday Afternoon
Trying not to use the credit card though. Just a personal thing.

on edit...I will check out the Kodaks at Best Buy and be more aware of this option. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
av8rdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
75. Sony Cybershot DSC-T100 Great image stabilization, great zoom (dialup warn)
Shot from my seat at a Reds game:



Shot from the exact same location with a little zoom:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. Holy Moly!! I have strong need to be able to do that !!
The need in me is STRONG.

nice shots, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
av8rdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. Thanks! Bear in mind that I have no skills whatsoever. That camera is truly idiot proof!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #75
84. Nice floating bat effect!
Wow, that's a good zoom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bif Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
80. I've used Nikons since the 1970s
But my first dig was an Olympus, which took fine pictures. Made the switch back to Nikon (D80) and I love it. Came with 2 kit lenses which are sharp and lightweight. Plus I can use them for Macro photography, which I do a lot of. The D80 can be found pretty cheap now, since Nikon introduced the D90.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
83. I'm getting a Fuji S9600/9100 for Christmas
I can't swing the $ for an SLR yet so we found a new old-model Fuji. I can't wait for Christmas this year!

Non-digitally speaking I liked my Pentax, my husband prefers Canon and my father Minolta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #83
90. what a wonderful gift! Good for you!!
swinging the $ ....how well I understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qnr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
87. Panasonic DMC-FZ28. Here's a shot of some Jovian moons I took earlier this month.
Edited on Tue Dec-16-08 11:10 PM by qnr


It's just a point and shoot, but it has 32.1x optical zoom (yeah, I meant optical, it's advertised as 18x, but in extended optical zoom, it's 32.1x), great image stabilization, HD video mode, 10 megapixel images, raw storage and pretty much complete control.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08072104panasonicfz28.asp -- I bought mine for about $260.00

Edit: I was just out shooting some photos of the Moon, Venus and Jupiter conjunction and decided to see if I could pick up the moons of Jupiter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
88. Nikon has the best glass in the business.
It was true when I went to photography school *cough cough* years ago... and its just as true today - though no one take real photographs anymore. hmph.

In *real* (aka NOT digital) photography - the lens makes the image. Nikon. No contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC