Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

is anyone else deeply bothered by the new use of the word "futurist"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:15 AM
Original message
is anyone else deeply bothered by the new use of the word "futurist"?
I think it's been going on for about ten years now, but it makes my skin crawl every time. "Futurist" seems to now often be used to describe someone who predicts or prognosticates about the future. In fact, "futurist" already has a meaning, damn it, and it's not that!

Oh, fuck! Even my stupid computer dictionary has been corrupted. I might as well just give up now and succumb to the future of the English language being nothing but a few nasal whines and guttural moans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm still pissed off about the corruption of "auteur"
and I agree with you about "futurist"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm afraid you stumped me there
I had to look it up. This is what my shitty dictionary that doesn't know what a futurist is says an auteur is: a filmmaker whose movies are characterized by a filmmaker's creative influence.

I assume that this is wrong? It seems wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Most people reflexively use it for a filmmaker who writes, directs...
and even acts in his films (hell, they even use it for musicians who write, produce, etc), but when the theory was first formulated it meant directors who had a singular style regardless of who wrote the screenplay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I see - so the definition I had does make sense
Shit.... the commodification of words. What's next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. "futurist"!? That's well worn, Gerard O'Neil stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. The theological meaning these days isn't used much
so the second meaning of "someone who predicts or prognosticates about the future" now dominates. Get used to it, the uses of word develop. Hell, there's even a third meaning, in art and literature. From the Oxford English Dictionary:

futurist

1. Theol. a. One who believes that the Scripture prophecies, esp. those in the Book of Revelation, are still to be fulfilled in the future.
1842 G. S. FABER Prov. Lett. (1844) I. 88 note, Dr. Todd and Mr. Mac-Causland..are alike stanch Antiprotestant Futurists.

2. One who has regard to or studies the future; a believer in human progress.
1846 in WORCESTER. (ie Worcester, Joseph E. "A universal and critical dictionary of the English language" 1846)

3. An adherent of futurism. Also attrib. or as adj.
1911 W. J. LOCKE Clementina Wing xxii. 278 After that they had gone to see the New Futurists.

futurism

An art-movement, originating in Italy, characterized by violent departure from traditional forms, the avowed aim being to express movement and growth in objects, not their appearance at some particular moment. Also applied to similar tendencies in literature and music.
1909 Daily Chron. 5 May 6/6 ‘Futurism’ is the declaration of the new school of literature grounded by the International Review ‘Poesia’.

So the first recorded use of "One who has regard to or studies the future" is only 2 years after the first recorded theological use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. I prefer prognosticator actually.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I prefer "fraud" but hey, whatever does it for you.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skygazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm still irritated by "normalcy"
:nuke:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. yeah, that one used to really get to me
.... I guess I've just been so beaten down by it over the years that I've stopped caring.

Now we're in some dangerous territory; you may get me to start a never-ending rant about people using "an historical" to mean "a historical". It is the greatest sin on earth? Kill babies? Fuck if I care. Call that baby killing "An historic event", and I'll fucking knife you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kind of make you want to write some sort of ...
... manifesto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. ha!
Yeah, no shit. When I hear that, I think, "don't they know?!?!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Seriously, don't you care their meaning is 60 years older than the one you prefer?
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 07:07 AM by muriel_volestrangler
Why are you so tied to a 20th century meaning, when the "one who thinks about the future" meaning was in use in the 19th?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I care because it's just stupid
I don't like how it shows a disregard for cultural history, and how it's become a term used to justify having some moron bullshit in the media about some crap instead of actually looking at facts, reporting, analyzing, etc.

I like the English language. I use it every day. It is the primary tool that I have for self-expression. I don't like that my ability for effective self expression is taken from me by some bullshit fly-by-night capitalist media whores that could give a fuck about what they're supposedly expert at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. So why are you supporting the most recent meaning - the 'manifesto' one?
That's the Johnny-come-lately. The earliest meaning was the theological "Revelation describes future events" one; then came the "someone who thinks about the future" one; then comes the "Futurist Manifesto" art one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC