You know... for women

[pokerfan]

From the Sears, Roebuck and Company catalog, 1918:

[AwakeAtLast]

1. Very useful and SATISFACTORY for home service.

:spray: :rofl:


I love the way you are supposed to shop by pen and ink drawing.....


:hi:

[trof]

2. OMG. My mother had one of those vibrators.

I remember playing with it when I was a little kid.
I'm talking 1940s.

You don't suppose...?
NO!
I don't want to go there.
:-(

[flying_wahini]

3. maybe she kept it clean.....

oh yeah, like women would never think of that - back then


hah.;-)

[rug]

12. Too late, you're there.

[undeterred]

14. And Sears had Vibrator attachments.

Way ahead of the sexual revolution.

[Arugula Latte]

4. So was there some sort of "other" purpose for a vibrator?

Is there some supposedly "legitimate" function that it was supposed to be for, but, nudge, nudge, wink, wink ... That sort of thing? :shrug:

[trof]

7. Sore muscles.

There's a lot of that going around.

[Arugula Latte]

8. Aaaah, yes.

Of course. Sometimes "muscles" need a "massage."
:think:

[flvegan]

5. Why are the big oscillating fans so expensive?

The big one is $27 but the fan attachment to the vibrator is only $1.30.

[pokerfan]

9. I was wondering that myself

It can't cost that much to add an oscillating feature.

[leftyclimber]

6. Buffer and grinder attachments?

:scared:

[OffWithTheirHeads]

10. Some chicks like it rough?

[mcctatas]

11. it's like a loofah!

[pokerfan]

15. Is there a Falafal attachment?

[rug]

13. The beater attachment was for the men.

[Deja Q]

16. Sears topped themselves in 1975

:hide: