Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I completed my jury duty today. Ask me anything!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:27 PM
Original message
I completed my jury duty today. Ask me anything!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are you glad to be through with it?
I was so relieved when I was done with mine.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yes, but I'm glad I was able to participate
It was a non-capital murder case, and it was supposed to be pretty brief. It started in June, and after 2 days of testimony went into recess to resolve a matter of admissibility. We resumed on Monday and deliberated for a total of about nine hours.

Very cool experience. All along, the judge went out of his way to praise the jurors for their participation and attentiveness. His admiration for the trial process was clear and infectious.

Still, I'm glad to be done with it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. So you were in recess for six months?
Day-um.

:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Yes we were, alas...
Upon return, we were all surprised that the trial was resumed rather than being started afresh with a new jury pool.

The judge said that such occurrences are rare but not unprecedented, having happened at least several times in Pennsylvania alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inchworm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I may be in front of a jury in the morning. Ask me wtf!
:9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. YIKES!
I think I'd rather be in the box.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Was it an interesting case?
I served on one years ago. What seemed to be an easy case turned out to be a total gouge on the part of the plaintiff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Very interesting, as a matter of fact
It involved the murder of a suspected snitch by a known crack addict who might have used his drug-dealing son's 9mm to do it.

I have a friend who once served on a jury in a two-week-long civil case in which the plantiff contended that the defendant did not complete basement renovations as had been agreed. Two weeks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Yikes! Mine wasn't nearly that exciting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friedgreentomatoes Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. was it interesting? as they show on tv?
or did you have a hard time staying awake.
I am currently watching the Law and Order SVU seasons, so the words "jury duty" gets my eye anytime <:P>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. LOL! Well, it won't be on tv, but it's been heavily reported in the local paper
I know this because my wife told me so, and I've gone out of my way not to read any of it.

Quite a cast of characters on the witness stand and named in testimony, that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. What consensus did the jury make on what is reasonable doubt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That's a fine question!
Unfortunately for the prosecution, there just wasn't much evidence available, and the overall quality of testimony was rather poor. As a result, we simply didn't have any solid way to connect the defendant with the crime.

In his closing argument, the defense lawyer made what I think was a good analogy, though I don't know if he came up with it or was simply borrowing it. He asked us if we would buy a house if we were given a description of it only as complete as the testimony we'd heard.

In the jury room, we all ultimately agreed that convicting the defendant on either of the two main charges would be like buying the house after only hearing a description of it over the phone (we came to this after hours of deliberation, so it was much more involved than I'm describing here!).

We convicted on the third charge which was still pretty heavy but not as serious as either of the first two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Good work. I always wondered how seriously jurors take the instructions.
I tried a child sex abuse case in Monroe County and the jury convicted on most charges. I was able to talk to two of the jurors afterward and one told me "We weren't sure exactly what he did but we all agreed he did something."

Idiots.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. That's an interesting inversion of the way my jury was able to view its case
Edited on Fri Jan-09-09 12:04 AM by Orrex
In the jury room, we all agreed that the defendant was almost certainly guilty, but we also ultimately agreed that the evidence wasn't sufficient to convict.

I have to say that I was proud of my fellow citizens in that little room. When we first began our deliberations, we took a preliminary vote and split 6 to 6 on not-guilty/guilty. That means that six people were able to reassess their conclusions.


We learned afterwards that the defendant did commit the crimes as charged, but in addressing us informally post-trial, the prosecutor agreed that the evidence didn't support a conviction on all counts, and he was pleased simply to get the third conviction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. There were three brazilian charges????
:wtf:

Did you get to use that in deliberations??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. What's Raymond Burr REALLY like?
I'll bet he eats hot dogs during those recesses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. He kept interrupting to deliver monologues about a giant lizard attacking the city
Other than that, he was fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. I have to go next Friday.
Did you get picked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Initially I was Alternate #1, but I wound up being Juror #1 AND the Foreman
Good thing I listened those first few days!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. Was the prosecutor hot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Not particularly, but the assistant DA was a pleasant-looking fellow
Of the two, he was the better dresser, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 13th 2024, 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC