|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 10:01 AM Original message |
Saturday morning CATFIGHT! Faye Dunaway vs. Hilary Duff over "Bonnie and Clyde" remake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darth_Kitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
1. Self-important little bitch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 11:02 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Oh come on, they both are "self important" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darth_Kitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 01:55 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Grace Kelly was no actress, Katherine Hepburn WAS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 02:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Alfred Hitchcock disagreed with you about Grace Kelly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darth_Kitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 02:05 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Alfred Hitchcock was a hack director. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 02:09 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Actually, I'm not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darth_Kitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. omigod, you are taking this seriously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 02:17 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. lol - sure, that's why I posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
2. Key phrase: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheets of Easter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
4. Wow. That's going to be a hot pile of suck. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
5. As long as they don't remake Mommie Dearest, Faye's legacy is safe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 02:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. That movie is rather good... for a bio-pic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 02:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. That movie is fucking awesome! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darth_Kitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 02:07 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Maybe Faye should go after Hilary with some serious makeup remover. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 02:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. LOL! Is there anything underneath the makeup? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darth_Kitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 02:17 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Well, probably, but too much makeup always looks cheap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TreasonousBastard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
7. Wow! It's like we're supposed to give a shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
9. Corporate starlots are the future (is that 'starlet' or 'harlot star'? Oh well) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-07-09 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
11. the real money could be in a three out five falls, no holds barred |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC