|
I'm going to bed now and it's gonna take a loong chapter in the Stephen King book I'm reading to get this off of my mind...lol.
But I wonder, is there a critical and relevant difference between self-mutilation and getting a tatoo or an ear pierced or breast augmentation (for non-medical or non-reconstructive purposes)?
I understand the infant has no choice, but we as adults do. And the definitions I've been reading on DU tonight as to what mutilation is appears to include those things I've just mentioned, and probably a lot more than that.
So technically, are the tatoo's we choose to get as an adult simply nothing more than self-mutilation? Are the peircing's that young ladies (sorry, guys too) choose to get a close rather than distant relative of deciding to get engage yourself in self-mutilation when you are old enough to make a rational consent to do so?
I've become aware that it's kindy trendy to get one's genatalia pierced these days. Is there any difference between that and a person who decides on a more... pronounced form of self-mutilation?
I'm not asking to get anyone pissed off or to be snarky (if I wanted to piss you off, I'd tell you about my new job in Cancun that starts next month... :) ), it's simply that the threads about this topic have brought this question to my brain.
Am I completely wrong and off-base on this? Is there something I'm missing?
Will check back in the morning.
|