He's slimy vermin who leached off of IBM before discarding them, let alone other activities which make him a pathetic little creep.
Other companies IBM went to in order to get an OS for their piece of shit with the appalling 8086 processor (the Motorola 68000 of the time was far more powerful) didn't take them up.
Microsoft saw how big IBM was and decided to hitch along for the ride. They bought DOS from Digital Research (I think that's the company's name), not bothering to tell them their true intent.
That's how MS got started.
You think IBM would have learned once that you don't deal with letcherous vermin.
Nope.
IBM and MS teamed up in 1995 to make the next generation operating system. OS/2 was born. But MS was busy making Windows, their own 'next gen' OS - which hit it big in 1990, oddly. (Apple sued MS and won, which is sad because Xerox had a bigger case against Apple and lost and the reasons were very similar...) Anyway, in the separation, MS got the newest and greatest OS/2 code along with the 32-bit HPFS file system code whereas IBM got to keep the existing OS/2 code plus get the rights to integrate Windows into it. (Having used OS/2 since v2.1 days, Microsoft clearly got - by far - the better deal as OS/2, despite its promises, was buggy and crash-prone. I'll spare you the technical details, but it would't even work right on hardware sold by IBM! ...)
I think IBM and MS were going to team up again to develop something else, but that's IBM's loss.
And it's all due to greed.
Hell, MS's licensing contracts are fascist as well. Up until 1994 even, MS FORCED hardware companies to buy MS licenses for every computer MADE - not sold - even if the computer would ultimately have Unix or OS/2 or some other OS on it. The law decided this was a no-no and namby-pambily punished them. Too little, too late. MS these days has similar stranglehold contracts. Meanwhile, the law does nothing.
Need I mention his products also being bloaty and crash-prone? XP and Linux distros have roughly the same amount of lines of code. Yet Linux is far faster than Windows and isn't as stable. Linux's excuse is that it's open source and people can do anything with it. In a closed, controlled environment, Microsoft has no excuse for their sloppiness. Windows has no place being on any computer, let alone any server computer!!!!!
In a sensible society, Gates would be greeting people at Wal-Mart.
Bill Gates is a vile evil squirmy shithead scumbag.
So, if people haven't grasped the idea yet, I don't give a fuck that he's a multi-billionaire. He's a slime trail left by a slug who doesn't deserve a damn penny of the money he's made. He sure hasn't earned much of it, 99% of his "innovations" come from everybody else.
www.vcnet.com/bms/ (boycott Microsoft)
http://www.vcnet.com/bms/departments/ (a whole list pointing out MS...)
http://www.vcnet.com/bms/departments/innovation.shtml (a list of innovations Microsoft did not innovate)