Is "sheepshagger" an inflammatory term?

[TXlib]

Poll question: Is "sheepshagger" an inflammatory term?

[texastoast]

1. Is that sort of the same as . . .

Shitkicker?

Goatroper?

All hat and no cattle?

[TXlib]

2. No, it's more like a

pigfucker.

But with sheep.

[regularguy]

3. No, but your poll is offensive to Sheepshaggers!

.

[TXlib]

4. Are you offended?

You must be from Scotland. Or Canada. Or New Zealand.
:7

[regularguy]

7. I might personally find sheepshagging offensive,

but I'll fight for the rights of sheep and their shaggers to participate in consensual, um, whatever it is......

[BEZARK]

5. Is "dubsucker" an inflammatory term?

I hope so, because I'd hate it if the dubsucker GOPers weren't offended when I use it. I like it in part because it rhymes with the ridiculous fish name "chubsucker."

Moderators on the ABC boards have a hard time with "dubsuckers" for the GOPers sometimes, but usually let "bushmonicas" slide, unless I refer to the GOPers as "slurping bushmonicas," then it's banning time again.

[Hoosier Democrat]

6. No, but "Pigfucker" Sounds Better

[TXlib]

9. That term is best if you wish to abuse.

"Sheepshagger" is best for jocular effect.

[rock]

8. Not if appropriate

Of course, I'm still thinking what that would mean.