Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I thought the new Star Trek was REALLY well cast - except for Chechov.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 02:15 PM
Original message
I thought the new Star Trek was REALLY well cast - except for Chechov.
All of the other characters looked and acted the part. Chechov just didn't fit. He played the roll well but I just couldn't get my mind wrapped around him as a young version of the Chechov I grew up with.

Oh, and the movie was far better than I expected, but that wasn't the purpose of this post.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, I agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. The only way they could have done better for McCoy
is if they had his clone. Karl "Eomer" Urban was dead-on perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Indeed. He looked and acted like Kelley's grandson.
Also John Cho nailed Sulu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. That was easily the closest match.
I thought Spock was pretty close also, and Nimoy's appearance at least suggested his approval.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canadianbeaver Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes...he was trying to hard with the accent.......eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Third that. Yelchin came across too hyper.
Koenig always played Chekov as very gentle, calm, almost repressed when compared to the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He just looked like a young kid with a perpetual woodie. Not the same character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeh, but that Kirk-as-VanWilder approach still got on my nerves.
Not as bad as the incredibly dumb plot, or the resolution of the story that undermined everything Roddenberry's Star Trek stood for, but still bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I decided to put aside inconsistencies on the grounds that they are launching a new movie series.
I had to do the same thing with the new batman movies, but that's another flame war of months past.

In particular, Kirk's dad and Spock's mother being killed, and the Uhura/Spock romance, messed with the story line from the previous movies. They used the space-time continuum argument to justify a new path but I was disturbed. Nimoy's apparent approval, by virtue of his appearance, made me reconsider. As with any remake, if you stick to the previous story line you are simply rehashing something everyone has already seen. They're "boldly going where nobody has gone before". I'm looking forward to what they will come up with.

That said, the best scene in the movie was young Kirk in the Corvette - "Is there a problem, officer?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Agree
Edited on Wed Jan-06-10 07:15 PM by sarge43
First viewing I was irked about altering the time line, but upon consideration it was a smart move. Keep the basic persona of the characters; turn them loose in a new world and see what happens.

My favorite: Spock kicking Kirk's butt all over the bridge. That was long overdue and deserved. Kirk needed a big can of whoop dumped on him.

(typo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. I heard on the timeline change
is that the next two movies will be them undoing what happened - so, it will eventually be set right. I could be wrong, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. It was well cast, I'll give it that. It was poorly directed and even more shittily written.
But it was well cast.

Except, as you say, for Chekov - though I think that was less a problem with the actor than with what was, more than likely, the direction of the director. It was such a bad performance, I can't imagine it was for any reason except that's what the director wanted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Oh shit no! The problem wasnt with the casting or the actor - it was with OUR EXPECTATION!
Bones was perfect. Sulu was perfect. Spock was almost perfect. Kirk at least fit. Scotty and Uhura were clear matches. Chechov just didn't fit what we expected. He played the role perfectly and if there had been no previous Star Trek movies/TV shows, he would be what we expect. He just didn't fit our expectations.

On another note, I would LOVE to bitch-slap whoever cast George Clooney as Batman. What the FUCK were they thinking?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I actually liked Clooney as Batman - I totally fucking hated the movie he was in,
and it was unfortunate that he had to play such a god-awful Batman- but I still felt that Clooney COULD have made a fantastic Batman if the story had been written properly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The idiot can't talk without wagging his head around and smirking.
I hate to say it, but Ahnold was the only thing that saved the movie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I agree on Clooney as Batman
He has the onscreen intensity and presence to pull off Batman perfectly, but everything about the movie - script, direction, plot - just sucked so fucking badly that they could have had Olivier at his finest in the role and it wouldn't have mattered.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. I heard they made the actor adopt that stupid accent
he really is from Russia & doesn't sound anything like that. Wish they had given him some lead to work with the Chekov character like they did with the others.

To be fair to the actor in the movie, Checkov always was a young prodigy, hence he looks & acts younger than the others. It was never overtly stated in TOS, but the character was pretty young to be a bridge officer.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. They tried to turn him into Wesley Crusher.
No, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Randall Flagg Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. At least he is a real Russian.
I kind of liked him for change. Karl Urban's McCoy was so dead on that any other spot-on portrayal would have come across as a lame attempt at trying to really recreate the series.

Me? I'm worried about Gwen and Captain Jack. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
19. Finally got around to watching the movie last night
and I agree that the Chekov character, while well played, just didn't fit. In the original series, Chekov is a young man - much younger than Kirk - an ensign pretty much fresh from the Academy and on his first major deployment. In interviews Roddenberry said that he had developed and cast the character with Davy Jones of the Monkees, then a young man of 22 or 23, in mind and that the character was for young girls to have a crush on. The Chekov character in this movie was good, but somewhat jarring. I also remember a somewhat different scenario for the Kobayashi Maru, although it may have come from one of the novels and not a Star Trek movie or show - basically Kirk reprograms the computer to have the Klingon commander immediately back down when he hears Kirk announce his name - more amusing than the new movie's take on it, although the apple eating was a fun touch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. That's why Koenig had a Monkees haircut nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
22. Checkov was straight out of the academy in S2 of TOS
I would of expected him to be in Junior High or Elementary at that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. I enjoyed this Chechov. I thought the casting was excellent all around.
But the "Red Matter," that really, really pissed me off. It was just so fucking STUPID and beyond any suspension of disbelief. It was like the death grinder maze in Galaxy Quest.

"What is this thing? I mean, it serves no useful purpose for there to be a bunch of chompy, crushy things in the middle of a hallway. No, I mean we shouldn't have to do this, it makes no logical sense, why is it here?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC