Can suppressing sexual desire and/or need lead to more perverse covert

[Demonaut]

Poll question: Can suppressing sexual desire and/or need lead to more perverse covert

activity? and please give a brief explanation

[SarahB]

1. Probably

I'm just not willing to give public explanations.

[Dookus]

2. Yes....

look at Catholic priests, prison inmates, baptists....

[Exultant Democracy]

3. Exactly,

Sex is a very powerful force, and if you stop it from it's normal expression it will find another way to come out.

[Paragon]

4. I dunno - since I've been "saving my chi"...

...I realize how much more unlikely I am to get laid. :silly:

[TXlib]

5. How else do you explain German scat porn?

[Rabrrrrrr]

6. You ask a specious, freeperish type of question

Obviously, the answer is "yes", which you ask in the way you ask with the hopes of thus showing irrevocably that the problem with Catholic priests and other is enforced celibacy, which proof you will offer as being the number of "yes" votes you get.

An honest statistician would ask this question: "Could suppressing sexual desire and/or need lead the majority of people suppressing it to more perverse covert activity"

The answer to the question you ask is "yes" but at the same time, in defense of the Catholic Church, of which I find little of redeeeming value, the number of pedarast priests is a very, very small percentage. Yes, the crimes they enact are horrible and should be punished, but it's still a very small percentage.

Please, be more careful and honest in your questioning. The way you framed the question is no different than the techniques used by freepers.

[Demonaut]

7. I did realize my mistake so I switched "Does" with "Can"

but your correction is better

[Bundbuster]

8. Proof positive

Just witness the perverse covert (and overt) behaviour of any one of the repressed, twisted bushCorp Junta scum or mediawhores.

Case closed.

[Moderator]

9. Locking

Sex threads are not allowed.