|
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 04:46 AM by RandomThoughts
Why is Palin mentioned in same context as video Montages?
Also there is an error in tense, In the line about not understanding you use past and future tense, a indication of non linear thoughts.
I find that interesting.
The point you make about putting together video montages is a great point, each one can be seen many different ways, however if the point is that people interpret what they see to fit what they want, then having multiple stories in a video montage makes alot of sense.
But I have a question, what does any of that have to do with Sara Palin?
As far as montages go For instance, the last few videos has some common themes, specifically the entire sue nation coming out of the west from Blazing Saddles, led by Michael J Fox character, that also says he is Clint Eastwood.
Then depending on your filter, it could be saying a horrible thing worse then even the pagens, or it could be a greeting of the saints with a holy kiss on All Saints Day.
Then it could be Fox, as in Fox news, or Clint Eastwood? Then again, it could be Marty Fly, or none of them since I don't follow label concepts.
Most likely the movie was meant to have a very low volume comment, but with correlations those comments can be seen more clearly as to the intent of the comments in the movie.
7 - 11 is from a dice game. So it is could be a comment of the Romans throwing lots for the Robe, or maybe not. Then there is the inflatable vest, which would be to float. And many other things.
It does have the Guy Fawkes V reference, and 555 in two locations.
But what does it really mean.
:loveya: and leave it at that.
|