Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

there are no "sides" to facts.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
MrsBrady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 04:44 PM
Original message
there are no "sides" to facts.
Facts are not issues.
An issue is something you need to see a doctor about.

George Washington was the first President of the United States. Which side of that should one be on?

I don't think people understand that there are facts and anything else apart from that is not a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I reject your reality and substitute my own!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsBrady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. yes....and after i stated my facts line
Edited on Sun Nov-07-10 06:47 PM by MrsBrady
this person still said..."yes, well that is true, you should compare honestly what you hear"

um...no, they still don't get it. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Like the assholes who want to teach "both sides" of the evolution debate.
Edited on Sun Nov-07-10 05:00 PM by Rabrrrrrr
There are no "both" sides - there is the factual side of evolution, and then there are the tens of thousands of other religious ideas, none of which are facts.

The intelligent design/creationist criminals would have think there are only two sides to the issues, and that "both" sides need to be heard, but they are criminally wrong.

I get sick and tired of people misusing "fact" when they mean "opinion" - "Reagan was president" is fact. "Reagan was a shitty dangerously ignorant president who fucked the country over in ways untold that we're still paying for" is not fact (well, I think it is, but I know it isn't).

Glenn Beck and other righties come out and offer as "fact" whatever their ignorant opinion is.

But, the Republicans (here's one of Reagan's great legacies) have systematically destroyed mathematics and science education in this country, so most people (of any political persuasion) simply don't know how to differentiate between fact and opinion. "Well, it doesn't seem to me that stuff is made of atoms and quarks and shit - I don't see 'em - so I ain't believin' in 'em".

Sigh.

Sorry - my post didn't really add any value to the discussion, but it gave me a good place to rant. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsBrady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. even I know that my religious beliefs are well, just that
beliefs. They work for me, but I don't need anyone else to believe them.

I know there is scientific fact, and I know there are beliefs. To me, they don't interfere with one another, but to some people they do.
I choose not to be bat shit crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
siligut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sometimes I make up my own facts....
Actually, Mr. Gut came up with that one when he knew his emotions got in the way of his reasoning. I agree with you of course, but facts just get in the way of certain agendas, so they have figured out a way around them, just deny them. Call it a conspiracy. Act like they know more than you do and that modifies the fact....the list goes on and on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsBrady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. yep
you are right on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, you know, there is on-going controversy about whether George Washington
was really George Washington or just an imposter pretending to be George Washington. I can provide a link if you need it. And of course, if George wasn't really George but an imposter then he couldn't have been President. I think we should teach the kids about this controversy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. They is what they is eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. There are no facts; there are only observations of phenomena and your interpretations of the same.
I don't really believe that. I just wanted to see if all of that fit into a single subject line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC