Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How come Ian McKellen didn't play Dumbledore in the Harry Potter movies?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Lucian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 07:55 PM
Original message
How come Ian McKellen didn't play Dumbledore in the Harry Potter movies?
Edited on Sun Nov-14-10 07:55 PM by Lucian
I think that part would've been perfect for him.

Or was it because he didn't want to be typecast as another powerful wizard? That would make sense.

:shrug:

Sorry. Just watching the movies on ABC Family until The Walking Dead comes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. That typecasting thing is a sumbitch to deal with
However, I will say that Michael Gambon does bring a certain air of open armed grandfatherliness to the role.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. M. Gannon has been great as Dumbledore.
Ian McK would have been good, but I can't imagine him in the role since MG made it his.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Gambon, I think


I still thought Richard Harris was better, but Gambon is an excellent actor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I misspelled it -- probably the auto-correcting software on my iPhone. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Sir Richard Harris (in the first two films) was good, but...
the sinister undertones revealed in Dumbledore in the later books would have been unbelievable coming from someone who presented himself as so benevolent and grandfatherly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because he was working on the X-Men AND LotR series?
"Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" was released in 2001, obviously the first of many films in a series.

Meanwhile, Sir Ian was working on two separate film series: "X-Men" released in 2000 -- a planned trilogy.
~and~
"Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring" released in 2001 -- a planned trilogy.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. If you were to do your homework...
the LotR series was filmed between 11 October 1999 and 22 December 2000. He could've played Dumbledore after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. He could have done a lot of things after that, i'm sure... but
Once again, he was already involved in two film series. This probably had more to do with it than anything.

The patronizing "do your homework" quip was really unnecessary, btw. :eyes:
I was simply pointing out his other ongoing projects.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Good point. And the travel would have been difficult. LOTR was
filmed mostly (or entirely?) in New Zealand, whereas HP is mostly filmed in Scotland and London. I don't know where X-Men was filmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. b/c Richard Harris insulted his acting
Edited on Mon Nov-15-10 12:22 AM by fishwax
There were rumors that Ian McKellen was offered the role to replace Richard Harris while Harris was dying, but he turned it down because Harris (who had wanted the role of Gandalf) had attacked McKellen's abilities as an actor, so he didn't think it would be appropriate.

On edit -- here's an interview where McKellen discusses it: http://www.totalfilm.com/features/ian-mckellen-interview
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. I think perhaps
Edited on Mon Nov-15-10 12:41 AM by hyphenate
(though I'm not sure) that McKellen didn't want to do it, but also there were conflicts in schedules.

Michael Gambon was "understudy" to Richard Harris, and since he was already involved, he got the job.

Strangely enough, my hope was that Michael Caine get the job. I think he would have been outstanding. Gambon has never thrilled me. Richard Harris, OTOH, was quite perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. that's a good question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. Maybe because two silly fantasy roles is enough for a decade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC