Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Funny Looking Numbers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 07:50 PM
Original message
Funny Looking Numbers
Numerals are usually written with a constant height, like capital letters. That's how I was taught to write them in elementary school.

In some fonts, however, the numerals have various heights, like lower-case letters. Have you ever seen numbers like that? They look kind of funny.

Some of the funny looking numerals have "x" height, like the letters a, c, e, m ... x. Others have "descenders" (like the letters g, j, p, q, y) or "ascenders" (like b, f, h, l, ...).

Here are samples from all the fonts I could find with funny-looking numbers:

Candara 0123456789

Constantia 0123456789

Corbel 0123456789

Hoefler Text 0123456789

Apple Chancery 0123456789

I hope at least some of these fonts show up on your screen, as they did on mine when I "previewed" this post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dude! Stop bogarting that joint and pass it around!!
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sorry, no can do.
Edited on Fri Nov-26-10 08:31 PM by Lionel Mandrake
Proposition 19 did not pass in California. Marijuana is still illegal here. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. My dear Lionel Mandrake!
Fonts are such interesting things...

I love the different ways they look...

Two of these fonts look as I expect numbers to look: no ascenders or descenders at all.

They are the Hoefler Text and the Apple Chancery.

A curious business!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's because your computer is not a Mac.
You probably don't have either Hoefler Text or Apple Chancery on your computer. What you are seeing is some other (default) font.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. How do you like biforms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I don't know. What's a biform?
Do you mean two forms for the same letter, like the pairs of forms you showed for the letters A, C, E, M, N, R, S, and U?

What kind of font is this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes. It's a lower case shape at an upper case size. They're also called common case or unicase.
This typeface is Filosofia Unicase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. The forms aren't outlandish.
A short piece of text printed in this typeface would be pleasant enough, but I don't think I would want to read a whole book like this. I've gotten used to the distinction between upper and lower case letters and would feel disoriented if that distinction were consistently blurred.

By the way, the terms "lower case" and "upper case" referred originally to the wooden cases used by printers. They are early modern names for a medieval concept.

The ancient alphabets were all unicase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. God, I hate Constantia for that very reason. Look at the number 98176 in that font
The zip code 98176 just looks ridiculous. A font to be avoided. Worse than Comic Sans


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That sure is a funny looking zip code.
I'll bet the machines in the post office have trouble reading a zip code like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Are you kidding? That's beautiful.
Rise, fall, bottom out, then rise again. Very nice. Very waveformy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Zero. Maya style
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Ancient astronauts taught 'em how to draw that.
Saw it on Discovery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. They didn't have to be taught.
Edited on Fri Nov-26-10 11:22 PM by Lionel Mandrake
They drew pictures of the flying saucers carrying the ancient astronauts. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Of course!
It's so obvious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. that is the Eye of the Tiger -
I heard it in a song.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I know that song. It's by William Blake.
Tyger! Tyger! burning bright,
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?

In what distant deeps or skies
Burnt the fire in thine eyes?
On what wings dare he aspire?
What the hand dare seize the fire?

And what shoulder, and what art?
Could twist the sinews of thy heart?
And when thy heart began to beat,
What dread hand, and what dread feet?

What the hammer? What the chain?
In what furnace was thy brain?
What the anvil? What dread grasp
Dare its deadly terrors clasp?

When the stars threw down their spears,
And watered heaven with their tears,
Did he smile his work to see?
Did he who made the Lamb, make thee?

Tyger! Tyger! burning bright,
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. I hope everyone knows I'm kidding.
To the best of my knowledge, nobody has ever made Blake's poem into a song. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
17. They're called "text figures"
The kind you're used to are called "lining figures"--because the tops and bottoms line up.

Think of lining figures as "capital numbers" and text figures as "lowercase numbers." In large text blocks the text figures are more graceful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. According to Wikipedia, "text figures" are
also known as non-lining, lowercase, old-style, ranging, hanging, billing or antique figures or numerals.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_figures

I see old-style numbers mostly in old books. The old-style numbers may be inconspicuous in large blocks of text, but they are harder to read than regular numbers. That's probably why old-style numbers are seldom used nowadays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. There's another reason
A FULL set of metal type has both lining figures--the ones used in tabular presentation, like grids of numbers (tax tables, lists etc) and text figures. (Lining figures are also monospaced so the columns line up.) When machines like the IBM Composer and phototypesetting machines like Compugraphics came out, they only had room for one set of figures--so they chose to use the lining figures because tabular work is a very important source of revenue.

When computers started running proportional faces, you only got 255 positions in a font, so obviously you didn't have room for two sets of figures. Once again, the lining figures were chosen.

A lot of people find lining figures stressful to read--they're the equivalent of ALL CAPS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Your historical explanation may be correct,
in the sense that it explains how we got to where we are, but I think your last sentence should be in the past tense.

I maintain that fewer and fewer readers have ever seen "text figures". If I am right about this, then there is essentially no demand to resurrect these "funny looking numbers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prc73450 Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
18. interesting stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC