Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I've seen "Inception" and I've seen "The Social Network" and sorry but "Inception" is waaaaay better

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:08 PM
Original message
I've seen "Inception" and I've seen "The Social Network" and sorry but "Inception" is waaaaay better
Probably what hurt inception was that they went for Summer Blockbuster (which they got) instead of putting it out right before the Awards season like TSN. But to me "Inception" was an original movie, with a unique plot and a much much better sound track (I adore Trent Reznor but it's true). I'm so sick and tired of biopics and now we have one of some 26 year old that is now selling private information to the big business. I mean don't get me wrong, TSN had some very talented acting but it wasn't original to me.

But that's just my opinion and if you don't like it you can kiss my ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. wait, wait
people are CLAIMING THAT? Are they high?

Nothing particularly wrong with TSN, but Inception was brilliant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Had Inception been released in late November it would have won all the awards
There is a big hurt for movies released earlier in the year. The concept is that the award movies are put out in the theaters sometime starting Thanksgiving. And these awards get snobby towards those movies that came out in the summer because they are deemed blockbusters and somehow considered less of a movie.

Joseph-Levitt Gorden and Tom Hardy should have received acting nominations. Those 2 were very talented in Inception and they had a very unique chemistry between them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. I Cannot Agree with You More
Edited on Sun Jan-16-11 11:17 PM by Yavin4
Heck, Facebook was even the first social networking site. I thought that the movie was nothing more than a celebration of Ivy League narcissism, and nothing more. The Ivy League is the prime driver of the obscene tuition costs for higher education.

Also, you're correct that Facebook is nothing more than fancy gigantic database designed to get people to enter personal information about themselves so that big marketers can sell more crap to them.

The idea that this movie will win best picture sickens me to my stomach. And then I remember that Dances with Wolves and Crash also won best picture, and nobody remembers those films, while everyone remembers GoodFellas and Brokeback Mountain.

Five years from now, people will still be talking about Inception, not Facebook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I don't think we saw the same movie...
The Social Network was by no means a "celebration" of narcissism, in fact it was a condemnation of it. There is a reason that the executives at Facebook hate the movie so much, the film is deeply critical of Zuckerberg and a major theme of the film is about how social networking destroys friendships and shuts people off from the real world. If you think this film was meant to be a celebration of Facebook in any way you should really watch the movie again because there is a reason you walked out of the movie appalled at the level of narcissism displayed in it, the reason you felt that way is that is the way the filmmakers wanted you to feel as they are just as appalled by it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. BullSh*t
The filmmakers created a celebration of how terrific and wonderful these brilliant Harvard students are and how ingenius Facebook is. When in reality, FB was not even the first such social network. It's largely successful because it's the first social network to sell private information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. You clearly missed the point of the movie
The movie is very clear that Facebook was not the first social network, in fact the main focus of the movie is the lawsuits that Zuckerberg faced as a result of ripping of other people's ideas. If you missed the scenes that talked about him ripping off other people you literally missed nearly the entire movie. The movie begins with Zuckerberg hacking into Harvard's databases and stealing private info on their students, and from there it turns to focus to how he stole ideas from other people and then stabbed them in the back. Aaron Sorkin wrote the film and he is a vocal critic of the internet, he certainly does not think that the creators of Facebook are "terrific and wonderful". Nearly every character in the film is portrayed as a greedy and manipulative asshole, this was a very dark film and it was not a celebration of anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. You nailed it, Bjorn.

It pissed me off also- the film didn't glorify greed and assholiness,
it framed it and highlighted it with a huge marker!


Yes, there was an abundance of self serving A-hole characters in TSN
and they pissed me off- The movie accomplished its mission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
29. That wasn't the reason I didn't like it but I do agree with your analysis
I mean most of the time when a movie is a biopic you'll see credit to those the movie was about or even have the real person as a guest in the audience. This year we saw Temple Grandin in the audience (Claire Danes won a Golden Globe for best actress in a TV movie portraying her) and I think one of the Ward brothers was in the audience (Their story was in the movie "The Fighter" with Mark Wahlberg and Christian Bale portraying the Ward brothers.) But yet not one person portrayed in "The Social Network" was in the movie or really had any part about the movie outside of some consultation from Eduardo Serverin (he had one of the lawsuits against Zuckenberg).

I mean I fell asleep while watching "The Social Network" and yet when I woke up I still was able to figure out what was happening, which to me says not that intriguing of a plot. Yet "Inception" kept me awake because it was constantly challenging me with it's well done plot.

"Inception" raked in big bucks for everyone involved but blew it for awards because of it's summertime release. Although DiCaprio's performance was ok I was really impressed with alot of the supporting cast and felt that there were 4 of them that deserved recognize especially Thomas Hardy and Joseph Gorden-Levitt. Ellen Page and Marian Cottilard were also excellent in the movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. I thought Yankee fans appreciated narcissism and even better if it was "Ivy League"
:D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. I disagree, The Social Network deserved to win
Edited on Sun Jan-16-11 11:46 PM by Bjorn Against
Inception was very good for an action movie, but The Social Network was damn near perfect. It had a great script, excellent acting, a great director, amazing cinematography and editing, and the score by Trent Reznor was amazing. I saw all the movies that were nominated for best picture in the drama category and The Social Network was hands down the best of the bunch. The other four films were all good movies and I would recommend every one of them, but The Social Network was the only one I would say was a masterpiece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. Can't agree
It had good dialog, and some solid acting. But it had one or two serious flaws that I thought really undermined the movie.

1) They never really discussed what facebook WAS. I think I saw 2 screen shots of facebook in the whole movie, and one was at the very end. If you didn't already know, in some detail, you were going to be left quite clueless about what all the fuss was. Even more so if you just thought of it as "another myspace/twitter" kinda thing.

2) It presumed some fairly detailed knowledge of computers/IT/software, etc. WHAT he was being accused of stealing was never very clearly explained. For anyone not schooled in IP issues, it was a bit confusing what everyone was suing about.

I will agree that it was an unusual movie in that it had no "hero". There wasn't an admirable character anywhere in the movie. The two closest were the original girl friend, and the best friend. And he was mostly the "lovable fool" who was obviously in WAY over his head. The only non-narcissist in the whole movie was the original girl friend (and don't you find it strange she ended up with a facebook page? And that he couldn't just "make" himself her friend?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. I just couldn't get into "Inception"
It was fine but Shutter Island was more head-trippy fun for me.

As for The Social Network, I wanted to be all ennui about it but I couldn't. I totally dug it despite the fact that it was a story about angry, privileged white boys, pretending to be wronged. The fact that the haunting score was the work of OG angry white boy, Trent Reznor, was an ironic cherry atop the whole cone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. While I certainly did not dislike TSN, I felt like I was just seeing it for the 5th time.
...Just a stroll down memory lane.
Inception was a wonderful and exciting thought trip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. I thought The Social Network was boring.
I found it quite disappointing. I really liked The Fighter and The Town, the latter of which came out so early in the year that it was pretty much forgotten. Inception was probably too confusing for a lot of people. I found it confusing and wasn't sure what I thought of it, but when I found myself thinking about it quite a bit the next day I figured it did its job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. Inception was an exercise in being perplexing
Sure, it was beautifully shot, acted, cut and generally well put together, but it was like listening to a fine musician playing scales; at some point, he/she is merely a technician. It didn't make me angry or feeling short-changed, and it strangely wasn't full of itself to a degree that it annoyed me, but it was just sort of "okay, yeah, right" and hardly the bee's knees.

The Social Network was a great story with a wonderfully difficult protagonist, filled with fun scenes of well-wrought social commentary that didn't come off as preachy or pat. It was a good, honest ride that touched on lots of nuancy moments, and even if it did resort to standard dramatic devices like ending with Zuckerberg looking at the page of the girl who threw him over in the beginning, it was a fine, full meal.

Black Swan is nauseating, self-indulgent, pointless drivel that makes triteness seem significant, replete with every hackneyed cliche of tortured and torturing artists, creepy shock-value flourishes and the worst kind of faux significance imaginable. After three of his movies, I'd sworn never again, but I got suckered by a friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Agree about Social Network, disagree about Black Swan
Edited on Mon Jan-17-11 02:10 AM by JCMach1
The Social Network was the best of the year, followed by True Grit.

I actually liked True Grit much more than No Country... By then for some reason I always like the 'less' popular Coen Brothers movies better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. That's actually an interesting point for some conversation...
I basically can't stand the Coen Brothers, although I haven't seen all of their recent pictures.

I saw "Blood Simple" when it first came out, and thought it was just another exercise, but then I LOVED Raising Arizona. The next two were deplorable (Miller's Crossing, Barton Fink) and then I liked a lot of elements of Hudsucker Proxy, but it still has the bloodless calculating of story and character, and the contrived extreme predictability of overwritten repetition in the dialogue. They're mean to the bone; characters are created--virtually whole movies full--simply so we, the cool people, can sneer at them with unremitting derision and dismissal. I absolutely HATED Fargo; it was so embarrassingly beaten into the ground, that even with great actors, it was an abuse to watch. From there, I checked out.

They want to be Preston Sturges with their dialogue and screwball plotting, but Sturges had a deep abiding humanity, and simply didn't take himself seriously.

Lebowski had great moments, and is fun overall, but it's still got the shrilly predictable characterizations and ham-fisted crayon-written dialogue, like the scene with Donny and the burgers.

The original Ladykillers is such a masterpiece that I shiver at the thought of ever accidentally seeing any of it. The original True Grit was iconic; I'll have to stay away.

They're mean. They're fake. They're calculated and clunky, and not a frame of it rings true for many minutes at a time.

I won't be surprised if we're in a bit of agreement about this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Feel the same about Fargo... liked Barton Fink and Hudsucker Proxy
My favorite is 'O Brother, Where Art Thou'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. I found Inception contrived and frankly, derivative... i.e. BORING
Would have had more fun re-watching The Matrix.

The Social Network, on the other hand, was a REAL movie and the best of the year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Totally. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supply Side Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
27. Inception is NOTHING like The Matrix
Nothing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
13. Did The Social Network end with "maybe this was all a dream"?
Worst.... Fucking.... Plot... Device... Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I wish I had walked out of the movie before that final scene - then I would have liked it.
Pretty cool movie overall, great concept, lots of fun to watch, original at times, and apart from DiCaprio's dialogue being so poorly written (like they brought in a shitty writer just for his parts, and let a skilled writer take everything else)...

but then the ending came and I was fucking disgusted.

"Seriously - two hours of all that coolness and neato wow fun, and you end it like this? That's the best you could pull out of your ass? Why did you let the guy writing Leo's lines write the last scene? Fucking idiots."

Totally hack cliche bullshit that no self-respecting writer should have stopped using when it became boring and trite thirty years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
14. "Inception" was like listening to someone else's long, detailed, baffling dream - had to work to
stay interested. IMHO.

"Social Network" - very dark, and I never understood any real motivation for Zuckerberg to be such a prick. Sorkin and Eisenberg created this weird mumbly Zuckerberg, played so darkly, when in real life, Zuckerberg appears so bright and smiley-facey. That portrayal - the cherub-faced sort-of-evil-doer would have been much more complex and interesting. Found the movie just so-so. Props to Justin Timberlake.

Agree with others that "The Town" got lost in the summer/fall shuffle, and was ultimately overshadowed by "The Fighter". Have not seen the latter, but loved "The Town."

"The King's Speech" was masterful, and I loved it. Colin Firth, deserving of all good things in life.

Hope to see "True Grit", "Blue Valentine" and "Buitiful" before the Oscars. Will pass on "Black Swan."

Did not really enjoy the Globes this year. Gervais was hit and miss and a tad mean (though better than last year, with all the penis jokes). My favorites didn't win in most categories. "Boardwalk Empire" over "Mad Men"? Buscemi??? over Hamm, Hall, Cranston??? I find "Glee" to be just mediocre, but I loved Jane Lynch's shout out to public school teachers.

Lots of lovely dresses though. Natalie Portman, Claire Danes, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Piper Perabo, Megan Fox.

Angelina Jolie NOT. She seems like an empty person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chrisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
15. "The Social Network" was a boring piece of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. Yeah...(as I said in a post) ..Wasn't it like seeing a bunch of films that you've..
...already seen?? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
17. I didn't see The Social Network, but Inception SUCKED!
Depressingly unimaginative for a high-concept movie, this was a waste of a great core idea and a great ensemble cast. I was continuously annoyed by the film’s tendency to over-explain the most obtuse elements and under-explain the most convoluted. The CGI, while perhaps objectively spectacular, was unmoving,like getting laid by someone really physically gorgeous but so lacking in personality and character that s/he actually leaves you feeling completely bored. Very disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. I couldn't even understand parts of Inception, especially what happened
in the very beginning or the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. It was one of those movies you had to see more than one time
i've watched it at least a dozen times now and I still find new things about the movie I missed previous times. It's just that well done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
24. Then "The social Network" must REALLY suck!
Inception was OK, but just barely. Great film making, crappy story.

Bake

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
30. I totally agree...
Inception had some of the most interesting casting in forever.

PS...there isn't an Oscar or Golden Globe for 'Casting'...shame.


Tikki
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuclearDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
32. How are you comparing the two?
One's a biopic, the others a science fiction story. It's like trying to compare Lawrence of Arabia and Star Wars.

I liked TSN on the grounds that it was well-written and had some great acting (Jesse Eisenberg is by far one of my favorite new actors). I liked Inception because you could watch it over and over and catch things you wouldn't the first time. I thought the idea was original, and unlike a lot of people, I didn't hate the ending.

People hate the "dream sequence" device because it gets used too often. And using it basically means that an episode, a movie, or even an entire series never really happened or had any consequence.

But in a movie that's so focused on the dream world as it is, it seemed like a fitting end. Besides, it's not as if every time a dream ended in the movie, it was without consequence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
33. I didn't find Inception challenging enough
It was well made, particularly the use of action to keep it going. But I thought it would be very complicated when it is ridiculously straight forward. There was never a moment in the entire film where I was the least bit confused or, to be honest, overwhelmed with awe and wonder.

All I can say is I hope it wasn't the best movie of the year. That would be a little disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan 05th 2025, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC