The shill accounts come out of Far Right activist groups. We saw a highly-publicized attack on the Digg rating system earlier this year. Digg.com had to rework its whole system and clean out an enormous number of shill-attack accounts. Thus:
“The more liberal stories that were buried the better chance conservative stories have to get to the front page. I’ll continue to bury their submissions until they change their ways and become conservatives.”
-phoenixtx (aka vrayz)
This is a big deal. From oleoleolson on Alternet:
Digg.com is the powerhouse of social media websites. It is ranked 50th among US websites by Alexa (117th in the world), by far the most influential social media site. It reached one million users in 2007 and likely has more than tripled that by this point. Digg generates around 25 million page views per month, over one third of the page views of the NY Times. Front page stories regularly overwhelm and temporarily shut down websites in a process called the “Digg Effect.”
"Reality has a liberal bias." An unsabotaged Digg.com reflects exactly this bias.
Literally thousands of stories (were) artificially removed from Digg due to this group. When a story is buried, it is removed from the upcoming section... and cannot reach the front page. So by doing this, this one group removed the ability of the community as a whole to judge the merits or interest of these stories on their own (in essence: censoring content). This group is known as the Digg “Patriots”.
DailyKos has been hit with exactly this form of attack. Censorship at DailyKos is effected by clicking a HIDE button on an article's comments. Every comment has a HIDE icon. Each main article/diary/posting also has a required "Tip Jar" comment -- there's always a place to register a censorship HIDE click.
These HIDE clicks are tallied by the DailyKos system against any normal account that is shill-attacked.
Special interest groups that effect censorship at DailyKos include fossil fuels, a determined anti-Obama team, and hyper-feminists that come off as contrived. The fossil fuel shills attack in-the-works green projects, but apply their full effort to nuclear power. Along with censorship, there's such as a bogus claim that the Fukushima disaster is killing 400,000 people with radiation.
-- Big Coal is pretty desperate these days -- when Global Warming becomes the dominant paradigm, they have big problems. Big Coal diaries get published several times a week. Hundreds of comments and censorship clicks are entered.
-- Anti-Obama shills usually present themselves as hyper-leftie I'm-so-disappointed nut cases. The President is depicted as a right-center NeoCon phony. These accounts post up versions of every RNC/Rovian talking point. You can read 100 times a day how these shill accounts have given up on Obama forever and will never vote for a Democrat again.
Complain about shill account operation and you're hit with a HIDE censorship click immediately.
So, does "Kos" Moulitsas follow what Digg.com had to do for defending his site ??? Does he clean out shill-account censorship ?
Not exactly. If anything, the opposite.
"Kos" Moulitas has to know what happened to Digg. He has to know about Leadership Institute in Virginia and their recruitment program for Internet dirty tricks. The guy's not dumb. So the mystery of the situation, post-Digg Patriots, is that "Kos" has outlawed even discussing shills. Identifying a shill rightie-talking-point comment is outlawed, even when sourced to a Fox "hosted" teevee show.
The existence of shill account was denied and then enforced for the site.
Meanwhile, contributors who were attacked by the shills with large numbers of censorship clicks are now accused of
"bannable dickishness." No analysis of the attacks is undertaken. None of the type of work done at Digg.com is done to identify such as a "DailyKos Patriots" dirty tricks crew. Censorship by organized groups is taken at face value.
An Irish bar joke can get a user banned.
One of the main guys running the site moved on to another job. This was Tim Lange, who uses the screen name
Meteor Blades. We knew Tim before there was a DailyKos, before there was an Internet. Tim's departure sets up a standard Irish joke -- a guy shows up late then he's been in for questioning, or if he's taking a job in America then that's a cover for having to do time for bank robbery or smuggling. Tim gets the treatment with a pint o' the brew:
I couldn't stop laughing. The best of the joke is that Tim is a huge guy, in his 60s, been way around the block, and sports a pirate eye-patch from losing an eye. "Pirates of the Caribbean" movie... yes, indeed. Wanna do a prison joke, Tim is perfect.
Well, if you understand things Irish, the sweeter the slam, the greater the compliment. It's a culture for guys, where a pinched nerve while playing rugby is a "special treat." Tim's part Seminole, but for Irish humor he really is perfect.
Not at DailyKos. Edgy humor gets censorship by the bucket.
This simple bar joke unleashed an all-time blizzard of censorship. The comments read like a hyper-leftie version of Rush Limbaugh. It's not enough not to get the joke. The default response is tweaked to espouse censorship. That's typical of shill-driven unpleasantness.
Any posting that supports President Obama or goes for humor or runs afoul of special interests brings out the rightie shills by the score.
This seems simple enough: "Coming to DKOS should be fun, not a Tea Party hate-fest." What we saw with the Digg Patriots was simple censorship. At the main left/center web sites it's a combination of censorship with nasty/name-calling/ugly slime.
Shill-swill slime.
So here's what DailyKos has to offer today. The first user comment to a "Kos" written diary that defends his actions at censorship:
Could you teach any of the Dem leadership how to just make a decision and stick with it? (207+ / 0-)
by lineatus on Thu Sep 08, 2011 at 02:07:42 PM EDT
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/09/08/1014670/-Purge-update">Purge Update
That slime comment got 207 approving RECOMMEND clicks. Big time approval comes from 207 DailyKos accounts for insulting the Democratic Party leadership.
My, my.
Other comments get up-or-down clicks from fewer than 60 accounts. Most got 10 or 20 clicks. Seems reasonable that this slime posting attracted a big time pile-on.
DailyKos Patriots ??? Who knows ? Is this type of pile-on a repeating pattern ? Do an unusual percentage of these accounts make a business of dissing Democrats ? I'd have to generate details of DailyKos censorship and anti-Democrat pile-ons to carry out a defensive analysis similar to the Digg.com work.
Digg.com did the right thing. DailyKos is going in the opposite direction -- letting the multiple shill accounts carry out censorship unhindered and doing nothing to limit shill-swill attacks on elected Democrats.
"Kos" Moulitas seems to have no idea what he is doing. He is living in a personal universe where the Digg Patriots attacks did not happen. Leadership Institute does not exist. Special interest-financed shills do not exist.
There is no reason for him to defend a pro-democrat web site. He's running on ego.