Gephardt criticized Dean for:
-- Promising to give Democratic primary voters angry speeches, which will give way to cooler rhetoric in the general election. "Howard, Democrats are not animals in need of red meat," Gephardt said, using the political term for harsh rhetoric. "After four years of George Bush, we just need honesty for a change."
Well honestly I laughed when I read this. It certainly doesn't match the headline...I wonder what else Gephardt said.
-- Being open to reducing the rate of Medicare growth. "In one breath, Howard Dean says he would never cut Medicare. In the next breath, it's on the table for budget cuts."
Certainly valid and well-documented here at DU. Dean also keeps using the 90s Republican talking point that he doesn't want to 'cut Medicare' but he wants to 'cut the growth rate of Medicare'.
-- Opposing the assault weapons ban as Vermont's governor, but supporting it in the liberal-leaning presidential primaries.
Clearly valid.
"I've come to realize that Howard Dean isn't shooting from the hip. That's just making excuses for him," Gephardt said. "Howard Dean knows exactly what he's saying when he says it. And if you think he's contradicting himself, well, as far as he's concerned, that's your problem and not his. Democrats deserve a lot better."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16260-2004Jan14.html
Actually I'm surprised Gephardt didn't keep going. Maybe he did. In their inverted pyramid they seem to have put the actual charges Gep was making at the bottom. I wonder if there was some cut off.