|
Obviously, some endorsements translate into votes, money, & volunteers (i.e., the unions.) But I don't know that individual endorsements do a lot more than deliver a cachet or news story and provide another spokesperson for the campaign. And the game of dueling endorsements between candidates can be kinda dumb.
All that being said, I've been troubled by the number of people here at DU that not only oppose Gov. Dean for issue-related reasons or electability, but use words like "slimy" or "liar" and "detestable."
And that's where looking at individual endorsements might be beneficial. And right now I'm looking at Dean's: Paul Simon (almost literally from his deathbed), Al Gore, Tom Harkin, Ann Richards, Molly Ivins, Carol Mosely-Braun, Martin Sheen, and Jimmy Carter (not "official" but you know what I mean.) There's more - those are just off the top of my head.
You may take issue with one or more of these, but this is a list of pretty respected folks. I just can't see all of them attaching their names to a candidate without really knowing something about him, character-wise. Nor do I see all of them attaching their names to someone who wasn't honest and principaled. A few of 'em have other agendas, I suppose. Or support him for different reasons. But the one thing they have in common, I think, is that they would not give their endorsement lightly.
I thought of this last evening while watching Martin Sheen on C-span at the Dean rally. I've followed his activism over the years (and no, I do NOT confuse the actor with the character he plays on tv.) He's a deeply spiritual and honest man, with a steadfast commitment to justice - even in the face of scorn and derision. There is NO WAY that Sheen would have endorsed Dean if he wasn't convinced of his honesty and integrity.
Campaigning is rough and tumble and I imagine if we look hard enough we can find tactics at certain times that do not reflect well on any candidate (although the larger the campaign organization the more likely it is a reflection of organization/volunteer than directly on the candidate.) And endorsements don't automatically cancel that out. And, of course no one should ever support a candidate because of endorsements.
But it IS part of the picture, at least for me, in trying to find out what a candidate is really like, as a person. We're all on the outside here - we'll never have a chance to truly get to know any of 'em. So maybe there is something to be learned by looking at the company they keep.
eileen from OH
|