|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 12:43 AM Original message |
A bi-partisan cabinet for a Democratic President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichV (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
1. I'd favor this, not for 7. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 01:20 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. 7 would be the max, but this is a number we would not likely reach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonAnn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
2. Interesting Strategy - Thinking Outside the Box? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 12:52 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I agree it isn't a great list... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pocoloco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
3. nader??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 12:55 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. yep... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MidwestTransplant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 01:02 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. F*ck George W Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 01:08 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Two reasons... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
7. That wouldn't work... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 01:14 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I know it is kind of wild... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doomsayer13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
11. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 01:39 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. good point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-27-04 12:45 AM Response to Reply #11 |
22. Not to mention "traitors". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leyton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
13. Clinton and Dubya have done it to a degree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
carpetbagger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:11 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. No republican Sec. of Defense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mndemocrat_29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
14. I think that we could have a couple of Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demo Gog (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
15. Not really feasible... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 09:52 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. not exactly who I had in mind... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demo Gog (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:08 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 11:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. The idea is to avoid appointing one to something important... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demo Gog (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 11:47 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Alright fine! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-27-04 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
21. I'd only do it for the purposes of retaking the senate or congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wabbajack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-27-04 01:49 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. No repuke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 02:06 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. I think Louisiana needs to start Gerrymandering... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 02:05 AM Response to Original message |
24. Bad idea, and won't work. US Senator is a very prestigious job... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
26. Nader shouldn't have any position. I would rather have another Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 20th 2025, 07:19 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC