Judge denies electronic voting challenge to March 2 elections

[reprehensor]

http://www.sacbee.com/state_wire/story/8287093p-9217510c.html

A Sacramento County Superior Court judge rejected a legal challenge Wednesday to California's March 2 election over allegations that new electronic voting systems are vulnerable to hackers.

Judge Raymond Cadei denied a temporary restraining order sought against electronic voter machine maker Diebold Election Systems, Inc., saying there isn't enough evidence of security threats to justify interfering in an election just 13 days away.

A group of computer programmers and California voters alleged that new electronic touch-screen voting machines being used in at least 14 counties on March 2 are insecure and could be manipulated to disrupt election results. Legal challengers included Sacramento computer consultant Jim March and Washington state resident Bev Harris, who has written extensively on possible security glitches in new electronic voting systems.

But 40 minutes into Wednesday's hearing, Cadei said he remained unconvinced "that there is a serious actual threat to the election process" and quickly ended a legal threat looming over elections that will elect legislative candidates and decide ballot propositions and U.S. presidential candidates.

More at link.

--------------------
Bastard.

[bobbieinok]

1. member of what political party??

knows anything about computers??

i would think anyone who's ever had a computer would not want the security of his/her vote left up to a comput.

[pinkpops]

2. How would he know if there's a threat ?

You either trust them or you don't.