Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

About Proposition 8 in California

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:18 PM
Original message
About Proposition 8 in California
that would change the California Constitution to ban gay marriage:

Yesterday on CNN (cannot find the link) someone said that the California Supreme Court invalidated an earlier rule banning it based on the Federal Constitution assuring equal treatment under the law.

Thus, the commentator said, if 8 passes, it would remove rights from a group of people and wondered whether it would still stand.

Anyone knows anything?

Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. it's REALLY about enforcing the christian religion on EVERYBODY in California
because the reason people have to be against gay marriage is all based on their christian religion, with the exception of some other religions like jewish, muslim etc, who believe gay marriage is a violation of THEIR own religions.

typical of religions, If they don't like it, NOBODY else can have it either.

msongs
www.msongs.com/obama2008.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I just posted on a board dominated by conservatives
and when I posted something like my OP, someone, of course, asked me whether I would then approve of polygamy and incest.

My reply was that polygamy is not between two consenting adults.

As for incest, I stuck my head and said that if two siblings or a parent and a child are consenting adults then who are we to say no?

I don't know if I will dare go back and see what kind of fires they are throwing at me..

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I've always asked the "pro pro-8" people "What is marriage?"
Is it about the sex, or is it about the lifetime commitment?

If all marriage is about is sex, then the idea of "sanctity of marriage" is definitely in trouble.
Prop 8 would then only be legalized sex contracts. It's all about de-legitimizing free will to having a legal partnership based on anything other than the type of sex one has. The next step is insuring that the value of people is reduced to having sex at the right time - like breeding show animals.

If marriage is about a lifetime commitment between consenting adults, whether or not sex or children are involved, then why the fuck would these hypocritical "sanctity of marriage" freaks vote for Prop 8?

Haele
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
smkyle1 Donating Member (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here are some links that can help you gain an understanding from the No on Prop 8 perspective
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Proposition 22 (the earlier 'defense' of marriage law) was overturned
because it violated the state constitution. Prop 8 would amend the state constitution, so it would not be subject to judicial review in the same way. Whether it violated the US Constitution would be a question for the USSC...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's incorrect.
The court mandated marriage equality based on the equal protections clause of the state not federal constitution. And if 8 passes, there would be some question as to which takes precedence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thank you. Was not sure
Of course state Constitution mandates equal protection so I can see the clashing clauses.

It may have to go all the way to the Supreme Court and by the we should have two new Obama appointees.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't think so.
I don't think it's going to ever be a federal issue. Prop 8 could be ruled invalid for being a constitutional revision rather than a mere amendment. This would have required a convention to pass it. The state court deferred addressing this until after the election if it passes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
den8uml Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. prop 8
glad to see some personal stories out of CA on this. I'm in Boston and we are closely watching it...we don't want to be the only 'gay state'...the ball is rolling down hill with civil unions, now gay marriage in 3 states (ct just joined the club for now) don't let the ball be stopped in its tracks out in CA!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Welcome to DU den8uml
Glad to see you chose your very first post in this thread.

:toast: :bounce:

P.S. If you have not been there yet, we have a special forum where Prop. 8 is being discussed at length with many personal stories

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=221
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Equality Tax Revolt Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. America Needs to GROW UP
America, (esp. UTAH) you seriously need to grow up. You would rather have children suffer being abandoned by society than live in loving homes. Who is the perverted one now?
This is an abomination.

We are your children, your parents, your grandparents, and your grand children. We are your aunts, uncles, nephews, and nieces. Some of us raise children; some children are our own, some are other's children (i.e. - abandoned).

Having the LOVE-orientation to fall in love with the same gender is AS SACRED AS any heterosexual love. Period.

And I will continue advocating EQUALITY TAX REVOLT until the law catches up with morality and common decency!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ReliantJ Donating Member (680 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Ironically
the youth is largely pro-gay marriage. Just look at the large change we had in 8 years since the last vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC