This post is a call for unity. Lately, many people have been sacking us Clark supporters because we have been a little over-exuberant for our potential "candidate". I would submit that while there has been some heated flaming, by-and-large we are no worse than anyone else on this forum. We just really like Clark and think he is the best person for the Presidency. Many have accused us of being akin to fanatical idiots without basis for our cause. This has given me a little distate for DU but I have to admit, I think this is one of the coolest sites on the web and I thank my stars it exists.
However, I hope Dean's recent statements can give some credence to the draft Clark cause. To be frank, Dean came out with a few very nice statements about Clark which should go to show that us Clark supporters have known something all along that the rest of you may come to know. That is, Clark is "one of the good guys" and may be a tough contender for the Presidency or VP slot.
Here's the quote (excerpt):
---
Dean-Clark in 2004?
On Sunday, Dean told CNN's "Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer" that -- if nominated by his party -- he would consider tapping retired U.S. Army Gen. Wesley Clark as a vice presidential running mate.
"Yes," Dean said when asked whether he would consider asking the former NATO supreme commander to join his ticket.
"There would be a great many people, of course, that would be considered as a potential running mate. And I must say, I think it's much too early to discuss potential running mates. I mean, we're five months from the time the first official vote and delegate selection takes place.
"So I find it very premature. But I think Wes Clark, he's somebody I keep in close touch with. He's a terrific person, very bright, very capable, very thoughtful. Our views coincide on a number of matters, and he is -- I certainly can't say enough good things about him. It would be tough to run against him."
(end excerpt)
---
Here's the link to the original CNN article:
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/08/24/dean/At this point, I have to give props to Dean. He has done amazing this summer. My biggest beef with him is that he has been somewhat divisive to the party (though we needed tougher rhetoric on Bush, because some of the guys in there (like Lieberman) were being weanies).
I will forgive Dean his indiscretion. After all, I am also a short primary care doctor with a firebrand's approach who trained in New England. Dean and I have a lot in common, when I think about it. :)
So, if Dean wins it all and names Clark as VP, then my heart won't be crushed.
Make no mistake though, I want Clark to be the top dog on the ticket but I am willing to say "hey, it's all good" if he ends up as VP :)
So, in conclusion I just want to put my hand out in a fair shake, give Dean credit for his succes and say I appreciate what he has said about Clark. Please, for those of you who are annoyed with us Clarksters, see that we really pretty much want the same things you want and that Clark is no fluke or fantasy. He is the real deal as Dean has intelligently alluded to.
Peace and warm regards.