Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Only a TRUE Republican idiot, would question Wesley Clark

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
devin79 Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 10:43 PM
Original message
Only a TRUE Republican idiot, would question Wesley Clark
Only a moronic coward of the highest order would even think about calling a Democrat like Wesley Clark, weak.

But since the Republican party has no shortage of moronic cowards, they will most certainly attempt this tactic. As usual they will fail miserably. Tonight the infamous wanna-be Republica "Fat Boy" Chris Matthews attempted to challege Wesley Clark's toughness. It is pretty funny for a draft-dodging coward like Chris Matthews to question the strength and bravery of a former Vietnam vetern and four star general, like Clark. While Chris and his girlfriend George Bush were busy peeing thier pants and dodging the war, Clark was earning the Silver star and Purple heart for bravery in the trenches of Vietnam. Republican filth like Matthews, Ann Coulter, and Bill O'Reilly, are pussies who aren't fit to wear Wesley Clark's jock strap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wes was wounded in Nam too. Just like Kerry.
I think they have the right to talk about toughness, those two boys. As for Matthews ... I think it would be time to send him a box of nappies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. You've got to be kidding.......I figured Matthews would have a "hard on"
about Clark.......be falling all over talking about his bulging biceps, the way he looked when he wore his uniform......his marvelous steely eyes.....but I guess Matthews only gets worked up about Repugs....

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's outrageous
The gibbering Republican media is so scared they can't even get their propaganda right. One moment he's a blood thirsty General who wanted to start WWIII . . . now he lacks toughness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Pristina Airport and Jackson
It's late and I am tired but for anyone who answered the Pristina Question over and over, please put this:

http://www.theclarksphere.com/archives/000347.html#000347

in a safe and handy place.

....snip....

So the questions raised by the smear pieces have been answered - Clark believed in allies at the time, and he believed in the chain of command, and he followed that chain of command. He believes in Allies now as well. Clark continued to rely on Sir Mike Jackson, sending him to negotiate face to face with Serbian commanders. Jackson continued on to be KFOR commander. Clearly, the two men, for whatever their differences over the Pristina airfield, did not decide the other was an unreliable colleague, and did not attempt to undercut or undermine the other's authority. It was a difference of tactical decision - Clark supported by his commanders and by Solana, Jackson by his superiors. The working out was not based on a larger decision about later negotiations, but over the working relationship between the US and the UK.

After all, if Clark's plan had been unacceptable, Solana could have simply withdrawn the "ACTORD", or Washington could have. Clearly both wanted the option in play in the negotiations, or one phone call could have stopped everything cold.


He had guidance for me. "I am recommending you move to Pristna airport as soon as possible," he (NATO Secretary General Javier Solana) said.

"Javier, I just want to be certain that you are comfortable that I have the authority to order this," I asked to be clear.

"Yes, of course you do. You have ACTORD," he said emphatically.
---------------

Let's be clear who we are talking about here - Javier Solana was the Socialist former Foreign Minister of Spain, who had opposed his country's entry into NATO, and who, as Secretary General, had the authority to order Clark to do this. It was Jackson, and later the British, who decided against it. The plan eventually adopted, to block airspace and the roads was Clark's, not "Washington's". On the 11th of June Solana ordered air exercises over Kosovo as a way of making it clear to the Russians that NATO was not merely folding its tent and going home. In his statements Solana emphasized that "all military options remain open". So, on the record, Clark had the backing of NATO to implement the ACTORD of 12 June.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Clark's main problems will come from those upset about Kosovo
They will have some problem trusting him. But if he gets the nomination, he should be able to get the Presidency - if the voting system gets cleaned up. The nice thing is that if Bush rigs the election, Clark might have the military behind him if he demands a fair election.

I'm not voting for him in the primary. But I'll support him if he gets the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. How lovely! Sexism, homophobia, and macho posturing all in one post
Pity to have that at DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC