Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DEADLINE FOR THE "PATRIOT ACT" (KUCINICH BILL IN HOUSE)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:35 PM
Original message
DEADLINE FOR THE "PATRIOT ACT" (KUCINICH BILL IN HOUSE)

September 24, 2003

DEADLINE FOR THE "PATRIOT ACT"

Congressman Dennis Kucinich continued his leadership today
on Capitol Hill today by introducing the first comprehensive
bill to repeal offensive sections of the misnamed "USA PATRIOT
Act." The Kucinich bill -- called the "Benjamin Franklin True
Patriot Act" -- is already supported by the ACLU, NAACP, a
Jewish group, an Islamic group, and 20 members of Congress.

Kucinich's bill would repeal sections of the original "PATRIOT
Act," that authorize 'sneak and peak' searches; warrantless
library, medical, educational, and financial record searches;
and the detention and deportation of non-citizens without
meaningful judicial review. Passage would be the final deadline
-- or death -- for the "PATRIOT Act."

Rep. Kucinich is the only presidential candidate who voted
against the "PATRIOT Act" in October, 2001. The other Democrats
in Congress currently running for president all voted for it --
and Howard Dean has said, "I never criticize them for that" in
view of the post-9/11 pressure. Congressman Kucinich stood up
to the pressure then...and now.

At a news conference today, Kucinich invoked the words of Ben
Franklin, "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase
a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

Kucinich added: "Will we stand by as the Administration formulates
a second more dangerous "PATRIOT Act" because, in the President's
words, 'the first bill didn't go far enough'? Or will we step
back from this atmosphere of fear and work to restore our basic
freedoms and rights? With the introduction of the True Patriot
Act, I say we take back our Constitution."


This is from the text of an e-mail sent to Kucinich supporters this
evening. I'd like to think the media will cover it. . . Look for it in
the British and European papers at least.


For more on Kucinich: http://www.kucinich.us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kucinich rocks
He's the only canidate that fights fascism 24/7/365. Dean and Clark are jeolous of that and his supporters can't deny how great Kucinich is.:bounce::toast: GO DENNIS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I dont know about that but Kucinich rocks
but hey you gotta believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He does
I truly wish the man had a shot at the nomination. But let us please get real: Dean and Clark are "jealous" of Dennis? Don't be silly.

Dirk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. wow... way to go Dennis...
That guy is the greatest. The more I hear about him, the more I'd like to have him for a president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dennis Kucinich just became my top choice for the dem nomination....
It's time for a real progressive opposition candidate. DK is the one. Even Howard Dean isn't showing Kucinich's courage. Democrats, let's shit or get off the pot. We not only need to take back the WH, we need to fundamentally change American politics. DK is our Wellstone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. HE IS electable
if we want him bad enough. Look at his record. All it takes is for us to get the word out and support him. All this talk about him "not having a chance but I really like him" will not do it. Get out and work and believe and it can happen. Go to his website and look at his record. It is possible but not if we don't make it happen.
http://kucinich.us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. As an undecided voter,
this goes a long way toward swaying my support and vote to Rep. Kucinich. I'm still wavering, but props to Dennis for this brave act. Where are the other Dems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. I will be posting the bill text sometime tomorrow.
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 09:57 PM by goobergunch
So watch this thread (not the P/C thread) for the same.

Without even having read it, iEndorse. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Well, this is now a P/C thread
but it will still be THIS THREAD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Thank you, and do post it in LBN, please.

Dean press releases have been allowed to stand in LBN so I thought press releases were considered legitimate news, particularly when the story is this important to all of us. (And I snipped the end of the release, which requests donations.)

The media will ignore this news if they can. I can't turn up any news outlet reporting it as yet, which doesn't surprise me at all. Dennis Kucinich is not the man the corporations want!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. BILL TEXT (HR 3171)
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

September 24, 2003


Mr. KUCINICH (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. SERRANO, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. SOLIS, Mr. HONDA, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Ms. LEE, Mr. STARK, Mr. FILNER, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. HINCHEY, and Mr. FARR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Select Committees on Intelligence (Permanent Select), Education and the Workforce, Government Reform, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL

To provide for an appropriate review of recently enacted legislation relating to terrorism to assure that powers granted in it do not inappropriately undermine civil liberties.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Benjamin Franklin True Patriot Act'.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:

(1) Benjamin Franklin stated: `Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.'.

(2) The First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution were established to protect the civil rights and liberties of all Americans in perpetuity.

(3) Federal policies adopted since September 11, 2001, including provisions in the USA PATRIOT Act (Public Law 107-56) and related executive orders, regulations, and actions threaten fundamental rights and liberties, including the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution by--

(A) authorizing the indefinite incarceration of noncitizens based on mere suspicion, and the indefinite incarceration of citizens designated by the President as `enemy combatants' without access to counsel or meaningful recourse to the Federal courts;

(B) limiting the traditional authority of Federal courts to curb law enforcement abuse of electronic surveillance in antiterrorism investigations and ordinary criminal investigations;

(C) expanding the authority of Federal agents to conduct so-called `sneak and peek' or `black bag' searches, in which the subject of the search warrant is unaware that his or her property has been searched;

(D) granting law enforcement and intelligence agencies broad access to personal medical, financial, library, and education records with little if any judicial oversight;

(E) chilling constitutionally protected speech through overbroad definitions of `terrorism';

(F) creating divisions between immigrant communities and the police that protect them by encouraging involvement of State and local police in enforcement of Federal immigration law; and the police that protect them;

(G) permitting the FBI to conduct surveillance of religious services, internet chatrooms, political demonstrations, and other public meetings of any kind without having any evidence that a crime has been or may be committed; and

(H) mandating the closure of certain immigration removal hearings, including denying judges the authority to reject stays of release where bond has been ordered and denying noncitizens the right to a bond hearing.

(4) Future legislation, such as legislation drafted entitled the Domestic Security Enhancement Act (DSEA) or PATRIOT II, contains a multitude of new and sweeping law enforcement and intelligence gathering powers many of which are not related to terrorism, and would severely dilute and undermine many basic constitutional rights as well as disturb our unique system of checks and balances by--

(A) diminishing personal privacy by removing important checks on government surveillance authority;

(B) reducing the accountability of government to the public by increasing government secrecy;

(C) expanding the definition of `terrorism' in a manner that threatens the constitutionally protected rights of Americans; and

(D) seriously eroding the right of all persons to due process of law.

(5) The above new and unprecedented powers pose threats to all Americans and particularly to the civil rights and liberties of the residents of our Nation who are Arab, Muslim, or of South Asian descent.

SEC. 3. NINETY-DAY REVIEW PERIOD.

Each provision of law, regulation, or other policy directive listed in sections 4 through 10, and any amendments made by that provision, shall cease to have effect 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. During this 90-day period, the Congress may, at the request of the President, hold hearings to determine whether a particular section should be removed from the list in section 4.

SEC. 4. PROVISIONS IN THE USA PATRIOT ACT.

The provisions in the USA PATRIOT Act (Public Law 107-56) to which section 3 applies are:

(1) Section 213, relating to `sneak and peak searches'.

(2) Section 214, relating to the use of pen registers for foreign intelligence purposes.

(3) Section 215, relating to the obtaining by the Government of certain business records.

(4) Section 216, relating to the use of pen registers in criminal cases.

(5) Section 218, relating to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

(6) Section 411, relating to new grounds for deportation.

(7) Section 412, relating to mandatory detention of certain aliens.

(8) Section 505, relating to national security letters.

(9) Section 507, relating to educational records.

(10) Section 508, relating to collection and disclosure of individually identifiable information under the National Education Statistics Act of 1994.

(11) Section 802, relating to the definition of domestic terrorism.

SEC. 5. PROVISIONS OF AVIATION SECURITY ACT EXCLUDING PERMANENT RESIDENT ALIENS FROM BEING BAGGAGE CHECKERS.

Section 3 also applies to section 44935(e)(2)(A)(ii) of title 49, United States Code.

SEC. 6. HOMELAND SECURITY ACT OF 2002 PROVISIONS.

Section 3 also applies to the following provisions of the Homeland Security Act of 2002:

(1) Section 214, relating to an exemption from the Freedom of Information Act.

(2) Section 871, relating to an exemption from the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

SEC. 7. IMMIGRATION REGULATIONS PROVISIONS.

Section 3 also applies to the following provisions of regulations:

(1) The regulation found at 66 Federal Register 48334-35 (September 20, 2001) relating to time held without charges.

(2) The regulation found at 66 Federal Register 54909-12 (October 31, 2001) relating to automatic stays for the Government in immigration hearings.

(3) The so-called `Creppy memo' that mandates closed immigration hearings in certain cases, and 67 Federal Register 54878 (August 26, 2002) relating to restructuring appeals.

(4) Any legal opinion or regulation that increases the powers of the Attorney General to authorize State or local law enforcement officers to exercise Federal immigration enforcement beyond those given in 8 CFR Part 2 or 28 CFR Part 65.

(5) The regulation found at 67 Federal Register 52584 (August 12, 2002), relating to registration and monitoring of certain aliens, and all notices published pursuant to that regulation.

SEC. 8. ATTORNEY-CLIENT MONITORING.

Section 3 also applies to the regulation found at 66 Federal Register 55063, relating to monitoring conversations between attorneys and clients.

SEC. 9. SECRECY ORDERS.

Section 3 also applies to the memorandum of Attorney General Ashcroft dated October 12, 2001 and relating to the disclosure of documents under the Freedom of Information Act.

SEC. 10. THORNBURG GUIDELINES ON RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION SPYING.

Section 3 also applies to any regulations having the effect of changing the effect of the Attorney General's Guidelines on General Crimes, Racketeering Enterprise and Domestic Security/Terrorism Investigations approved by Attorney General Dick Thornburg for the Department of Justice on March 21, 1989.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.R.3171:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Gotta love him
The sponsors are some of the best names, we got DK himself, McDermott, and DK's buddy Barbara Lee, well I bet all these people are his buddies. In fact Woosley endorsed him. Maybe these will fellow soon too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Moving to Politics and Campaigns...
this is a candidate press release, not LBN. Sorry!

Dookus
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I thought press releases were LBN...
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 10:19 PM by goobergunch
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Moderator please explain
It seems to me that a Congressman's introduction of a bill "to REPEAL offensive sections of the misnamed "USA PATRIOT
Act" is, indeed, news--whether it has been picked up by the media or not. More so coming from an announced candidate for the Democratic nomination to president. Moreover, I do not see how it runs afoul of any stipulated rules for posting to the LBN. Your moving it to this forum emplies, to me, that you view this as *merely* some sort of politicking. I strongly disagree.



1. NO opinion pieces, editorials, or other stories that are not news.
2. NO news that is more than 12 hours old.
3. NO duplicate posts of stories that have already been posted.
4. NO polls, petitions, or other action items.
5. All of our other rules for posting apply as well, including copyright rules.
6. When posting articles, please use the published title of the article as the title of the discussion thread.
7. Discussion of Israeli/Palestinian issues is not permitted in the Latest Breaking News forum, and instead must be posted in the Israeli/Palestinian Affairs forum. If, however, the news item is primarily about U.S. policy in Israeli/Palestinian affairs, you may post it in the Latest Breaking News forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. I like Kucinich
and really do think that if he were president that many good things would come to this country that were long overdue. However it seems that his numbers are not doing all that well in the polls. Its a real shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippywife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. All of us who
believe in what he stands for and support his ideas can change that. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. again..it depends WHICH polls
don't put all that much faith in most of em anyway...

We can change it...WE can get this man elected!
We...the PEOPLE!!

Peace
DR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Send his campaign money...the poll numbers will follow
What kind of world do you want to live in and leave to your kids and grandkids? The answer to that tells you what you need to do.

We can change the polls. We can change the outcome. All we need is to truly decide to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. yep
You know honestly I think I finally came up with my big reason to explain why I support Kucinich. You know how many wars the US has fought in my short lifetime right guys. Why must members of my generation continue to suffer in war. We need peace and justice. We cant let the polls guide our future nor can we let our superfical side get to us, we must be guided by our hearts and a desire to do better for the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. If you want to get rid of the Patriot Act, WRITE YOUR REP NOW!

Write your senators, too, and tell them you expect them to vote for the Kucinich bill when it reaches them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. Now THIS is pragmatic action!
Thank you, Dennis!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thomas Jefferson Donating Member (113 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
23. Clearly opposition to the Patriot Act is out of the mainstream
Personally, I think the opposition to Kucinich is out of the mainstream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. WOW, Thomas Jefferson supports Dennis Kucinich!!!


Welcome to DU, Tom! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC