This is the conclustion from the Concord Monitor after watching the debates:
<
http://www.primarymonitor.com/news/stories2003/edit092903_2003.shtml>
"John Edwards put on a good showing, answering directly and succinctly several questions that sent other candidates scurrying for the nearest equivocation or generalization."
The article points out how candidates are making news with attacks or flashy non-substantive statements. Solid answers don't make the news like a knife thrown between another candidate's eyes or a nifty half-truth in response. Can't we do better? We can. Here's how: <
http://www.johnedwards2004.com>