Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sabato: Lieberman, Gephardt or Edwards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
DemDogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 10:51 PM
Original message
Sabato: Lieberman, Gephardt or Edwards
are the only ones who can beat Bush according to Larry Sabato's electoral map. (Don't flame me, it's not my map.)
<http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/pres_college-othercands.htm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd throw-in Dean..
with the right VP who could deliver 6 more electoral votes from one of those striped states.. sayy.. Clark?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't see how he figures that one out...
...I don't think either of these three would be the strongest candidate if he got the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. I like Gephardt and Edwards both
I believe they are both good candidates, but I think Edwards would have a better chance to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cindyw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Don't assume Lieberman can win California
What makes him think that Lieberman can win Florida? With Jeb in office, a Dem will have to have a huge lead to overcome the cheating hijinx coming in that state. And there is also reason to believe that Lieberman could lose California. Arnold will campaign against and apparently boring people need not apply in my idiot state.

I would also like to see why he thinks Kerry would lose Florida, as opposed to Lieberman. Also, why would Edwards necessarily win N.C. I hear he is not too popular there. maybe as VP he could bring the state in if people thought there was more experience backing him up in a Pres. candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Feinstein's managed to do well in CA and she's boring
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pez Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. heh
migrated jewsih population from new york?

oh and i think your subject should be "...florida"

;-D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. There's no real analysis here
All Sabato did was assume that each Democratic candidate would carry all the states whose electoral votes were awarded to Gore, as well as their home state (if it wasn't carried by Gore). And in the case of Lieberman, he included Florida's electoral votes.

So Dean losese because he can only carry the states Gore won. And Gephardt and Edwards win because, according to Sabato, they can carry their home states IN ADDITION to the states carried by Gore. And Lieberman can win because he can carry Florida as well as the states carried by Gore.

Real imaginative. And this guy's a professor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Sabato is rarely creative or insightful
Plus, he tilts distinctly right. Anything that oddly dismisses Dean or a Democratic frontrunner can be expected.

I have looked at Sabato's race-by-race analysis for years on his website. The only redeeming qualities are he has sources in individual states who sometimes make sense, and not in a conventional wisdom fashion. Plus, Sabato understands the partisan tendencies of states and does not go overboard in projecting bizarre pickups in unfriendly states, unlikely many zealots on DU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemDogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Not a Sabato fan but
You can't assume that anyone who dismisses Dean's chances "leans right" -- His analysis has been pretty successful and he is not the only one who thinks people like Gephardt and Edwards have the best chance to win the general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Just my impression over the years
Sabato is not exactly a newcomer. I read his book on the 2000 election, and have seen him host many political panels on C-SPAN. Plus the appearances on CNN, MSNBC, etc. I would say he gives the right a 60/40 break.

I am an Edwards supporter who believes he would have the best chance in the fall, although Wesley Clark may cause me to re-evaluate. Both Edwards and Clark focus on positives and the future. I'm concerned Dean's rhetoric ("Bush is the enemy") plays well at DU but would flop nationwide.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. No Clark. So I assume this analysis is B4 Clark entered..
the race. Therefore it is null.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemDogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Actually on the previous pages Clark is covered (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Cynically Speaking we are being conditioned to accept Insiders

after deliberatly scouting all the TV programs this weekend, the pundits ae busy conditioning us to the idea that only establishment Candidates can be President. Look at each of these canddiates. Close your eys and imagine each one ofthem competinmg with Bush. Do they jump out enough that if you are a swing voter you are going to jump up and down and say I will risk change and go wtih this guy. Secondly do you see Democratic Activists jumping up and down in excitemnet?? Do you see Joe Lunch Pail looking at these guys and getting excitd enough?? <These pesky outsiders like Clark and Dean asre such a bother--they will be falling like lead soon--they have no place to go but down--Pundits opinion.> I say look at all candidates and make up your own mind. Pundits want an early candidate--so the Bush Machine can destroy him before the election campaign can begin.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rads Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
11. Lazy analysis
Granted, this far out it's really not in anyone's interest to do an in-depth state-by-state analysis for all of the matchups. But, this whole thing just reeks of intellectual laziness from a guy who should (probably) know better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'd change West Virginia and Minnesota
If Dean gets the monination I'd move West Virginia to leaning Democrat. Deans gun stance I think will have play in that normally Democratic State. And I think Minnesota should be moved from Probable to leaning Democrat no matter who the nominee is. It's been trending right for the past few elections, and I think that will continue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. Missouri
is going to be impossible to predict. We have anti-incumbancy towards a Republican leg and Democratic Governor. Guns will be a factor. Education will be a factor. No way does the entire state "lean Gephardt" He has only ever won a single district congessional here. It may however, be leaning towards dumping Bush after NCLB.
Given the political climate, I almost wouldn't be shocked to see us go for the Democrat nationally, replace some local Republican legislators with Dems, AND elect a Republican Governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Gore States Plus AZ means Dem victory
We should focus on Gore states and anyone of those Bush00-but-now-we-hate-him-states. AZ is in play, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's a big stretch to say that Edwards would win NC.
He is not that popular there. I would personally expect Dean to do better in places like WV than Sabato says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemDogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Edwards will win NC
He has been growing in support in NC each time it is polled. When it comes time to vote for the first NC President ever, NC pride will be added to his growing support.
And Dean has zero chance in WV. They aren't voting for a Vermont governor with his record even if he IS pro-gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. WV voted for Dukakis.
I think that should tell you something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. I wonder why Ohio isn't in the Democratic column.
Hell, it should at least be a battleground state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-09-03 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. Or Shwahzenneggah!
Oh sorry, I've been without internet for a month and the only thing on the news was about this Arnold fellow. I think I've been brainwashed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC