Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman takes a hit on environment & integrity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
baby_bear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 11:02 AM
Original message
Lieberman takes a hit on environment & integrity
http://www.hillnews.com/news/102203/lieberman.aspx

<snip>
Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.) has a problem with Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt (R), President Bush’s choice to head the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

But the committee chairman charged with steering Leavitt’s nomination through the Senate has a problem with Lieberman.

“He doesn’t really know what’s going on in the committee,” Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) charged. “He’s out there running for president.

“I think it’s outrageous for Senator Lieberman . He won’t even come to our hearings, let alone the confirmation hearing.

“That Senator Lieberman wouldn’t even meet with him and then go out and condemn him is just unconscionable. That is so uncharacteristic of the image he had before race.”

Of 27 meetings that have taken place this year before both the full committee and subcommittees Lieberman sits on, the presidential candidate has attended just two.
Notably, committee aides say, Lieberman has skipped all seven of the panel’s legislative markups, where the nuts and bolts of bill writing is done.

Additionally, the Republican National Committee reports on its website that Lieberman has missed 20 environmental votes in the Senate, including legislation on ethanol, drought relief and nuclear power plants.
</snip>

Lieberman has probably the strongest environmental record of all the Democratic presidential candidates. I hope there's more fluff than substance in this report, but it doesn't sound good. I'm not impressed when senators miss important sessions and votes because they are campaigning. (I was wondering why Edwards didn't vote in yesterday's abortion-procedure ban vote yesterday, for example.)

s_m

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm thinking its time for Joe to stay home and take care of Senate work
His numbers don't look promising, I'm not seeing that he offers anything new on a crowded stage, and this looks bad for the Dem cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, but just try telling Holy Joe
that. He just doesn't seem to get the message, and he's probably having too much fun bashing Dems anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm so sick of him...
he has absolutely no campaign strategy other than to repeatedly attack whoever the front runner is. He needs to quit and go back to the Senate where he can make better use of his time and stop wasting ours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. Poor Joe
Joe has been a good Senator. He really has, though his conservative slant means he is more likely to support a Republican bill than a Democratic bill, he has been a nice stabilizing force in the Senate.

He needs to stay in the Senate. He could do more good for the Democratic party right now but dropping out of the race. I never advocated anyone leaving before the primaries, so I am only half-heartedly saying this now, but ideally he will step away from the campaign after South Carolina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm no fan of Joe's, but
attacking him for opposing Bush's EPA nominee is misguided, at best.

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., became the fifth Senate Democrat with plans to hold Leavitt's nomination from coming to a full floor vote until getting satisfactory answers or commitments on specific environmental issues from the White House.
"The unfortunate truth is that it doesn't matter who heads the EPA under this administration, because they will be nothing more than another pawn for the corporate polluters who control the White House's agenda," Kerry said in a statement posted on his Senate Web site Wednesday. "Governor Leavitt may eventually be approved by the Senate, but I cannot in good conscience allow that process to even move forward without getting the answers that the people of Fairhaven, Mass., New York City and communities across the nation deserve."
Kerry said he wants to know why the EPA is delaying the Superfund cleanup of an old nail and tack manufacturing plant in Fairhaven that is contaminated with PCBs, cyanide, pesticides and other toxins. The cleanup began under the Clinton administration but has received no federal funds during the past two years, said Kerry.
Kerry is also joining Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., and Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., in demanding more information from the White House on whether it pressured EPA to knowingly mislead the public on the dangers to New York City residents from airborne contaminants at Ground Zero following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, as claimed in a new internal investigative report.
Clinton has said she will hold Leavitt's nomination until she gets satisfactory answers from the Bush administration on the air quality announcements. Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Tuesday that he will block Leavitt's nomination from the floor until a nuclear waste expert on his staff is nominated by the president to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., said last week that he will hold back the Leavitt confirmation vote until EPA complies with his year-old request to study human health effects of the Bush administration's new clean-air regulations. Lieberman has vowed to block the nomination until he is given assurances that Leavitt will be "an independent advocate for protecting the environment."
<snip>
Although five holds out of 100 Senate members seems a small number, there is a chance more Democrats will join in blocking the Leavitt nomination as a protest of both the Bush environmental agenda and the fast-track way the GOP majority conducted the Leavitt confirmation process. Several Democrats on the Senate Environment Committee complained that the panel chairman, Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., had not allowed enough time in Tuesday's hearing for detailed questions, with Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., charging that Inhofe had given Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, 20 minutes to deliver a laudatory introduction of Leavitt while limiting Democrats' critical questions to five minutes each.
http://www.sltrib.com/2003/Sep/09252003/utah/95647.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm not a fan of Lieberman but he opposed Yucca Mountain
and his environmental record has been excellent. That's why the environmentalists would support him before Howard Yucca Mountain Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. LCV Officially Says Kerry Has Best Record
"Of the possible candidates with Capitol Hill voting records to scrutinize, Kerry has the highest lifetime League of Conservation Voters scorecard tally at 96 percent."

http://www.lcv.org/News/News.cfm?ID=1610&c=27
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Kerry is the best on the environment
Kucinich and Lieberman I think are solid too. I am very impressed with that on Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is a RW hatchet job
I'm ashamed to see it posted here. Joe doesn't need to be at the hearing to know about Leavitt, his non-responses, and general unfitness for the position. And it is equally annoying when people expect someone to campaign for the Presidency and make every meeting and vote at the same time. It's not realistic and sounds to me like an excuse to attack somebody rather than a genuine reason to withhold support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC