Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(NYDailyNews) Dean Hires Davis Smear Man

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
DJcairo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:23 AM
Original message
(NYDailyNews) Dean Hires Davis Smear Man
Gee. Look who's the first to go negative. I thought this guy was the frontrunner. Look's like Dean and his high command are getting a littel desperate and a little nervous.

Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean likes to present himself as a breath of fresh air: He won't join the cynical, insider political culture that he repeatedly describes in speeches as "Say whatever it takes to get elected."
So it was with considerable glee this week that a top aide to a Dean opponent informed me that the former Vermont governor has just hired killer gumshoe Ace Smith to gather dirt on political rivals.

The very same Ace Smith who ran "oppo research" for sharp-elbowed, soon-to-be-ex-California Gov. Gray Davis - "puke campaigns," in the words of Arnold Schwarzenegger.

"Ace certainly has that jugular instinct," says an operative who has worked closely with him on Davis' campaigns.

The 44-year-old Smith - who operates from a San Francisco office building that was used in the movie "Dirty Harry" as a crazed sniper's perch - didn't sound pleased when I phoned him yesterday.

"I'm trying to be really low-key," he told me. "My name appearing in a newspaper somewhere doesn't do me a whole lot of good. I'm not doing anything tremendously interesting anyway.

I'm just helping them get their whole research department organized. It's really quite bureaucratic and boring."

Political consultants such as Smith can receive fees of as much as $30,000 monthly, but neither Smith nor the Dean campaign would comment on his compensation.

As for rival campaigns that might accuse Dean of hypocrisy for recruiting this hired gun, "Personally, I think it's laughable," Smith said. "Gimme a break. I don't think anyone cares about who the consultants are anyway."

Dean campaign spokesman Jay Carson told me: "Whenever you get attacked by a bunch of Washington insiders, it's good to have someone on your side who knows them well."


http://www.nydailynews.com/news/story/129739p-115983c.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Racenut20 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. What is that word????
Hippo-something??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. So Dean hired a guy who worked for Gray Davis
and did opposition research against Arnold that the groper thought was "dirty politics". Big deal. And I see it was a Dean opponent who tipped off the paper with "glee". And what do you mean that Dean is the first to get dirty? What has he done? explain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJcairo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. He is the first to launch attack ads in IA and NH
From the NYTimes

In New Ads, Dean Becomes First in Campaign to Attack Fellow Democrats
By JODI WILGOREN and JIM RUTENBERG

Published: October 23, 2003


CRESCO, Iowa, Oct. 22 — Howard Dean this week began running two new television advertisements that criticize his rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination as "Washington politicians" who have failed to deliver prescription drug benefits and were inconsistent on the Iraq war.

The commercials are the first of the election campaign's nascent television advertising battle in which a Democratic candidate has criticized the other primary contenders. (President Bush has been fair game for weeks.)

While the spots fall short of singling out Dr. Dean's opponents by name, they are unusually negative for this stage of the campaign, when biographical commercials are the norm.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/23/politics/campaigns/23DEAN.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. he is responding to attacks
on his record by Gephardt and Kerry which is legitimate. He is also speaking out about his own record in Vermont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Jan. 23
When he also first called the others "Bushlite" to smear them.

http://www.cmonitor.com/stories/news/local2003/012303dean_2002.shtml

I can't wait for those four guys from Congress to come up here and explain to us why they wanted to raise your property taxes after they supported a tax cut for the wealthiest people in America," he said.

Dean also criticized his opponents for voting to give Bush a "blank check" on military intervention in Iraq - and, now, changing their tune on the issue.

"Today, they're running around telling you folks they're all anti-war," he said. (Later, he acknowledged that Lieberman's vote was consistent with the senator's comparatively "hawkish" position on Iraq.) "We're never going to elect a president that does those things. If I voted for the Iraq resolution, I'd be standing in favor, supporting it right now in front of you."

Dean said he would have voted instead for the Biden-Lugar resolution, which he said supported disarming Saddam using multilateral action, and which did not call for a "regime change."
>>>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Check out the ads yourself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yeah, that's real "attack" all right! Attacking Washington
for not getting anything done! Oh, that's telling the facts, sorry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. What about the hoards of "Dean Divers"...
...now combing through massive piles of records in VT looking for any dirt they can find on Dean?

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=511&ncid=696&e=10&u=/ap/20031021/ap_on_el_gu/dean_divers

Seems to me like everyone is doing it. I'm sorry to see Dean join the rest of the crowd, but I'm not surprised. Self defense of some kind is a necessity. If I were going to vote for the candidate who has never dug up dirt on an opponent I'd have nobody to vote for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PAMod Donating Member (651 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think we are going to see an influx of campaign talent
into the top tier campaigns. I don't see any desparation in any of the camps yet.

I'm sure the front runner and his closest competitors state by state will each have a "hatchet man" on staff. I'm sure Senator Kerry & Representative Gephardt didn't do their own research on Dean's past statements, for example.

I did opposition research for Senator Harris Wofford's 1991 campaign against former Governor Dick Thornburgh - a race that we were supposed to lose. We were called the "propeller heads" and spent countless hours in the basement of the state capitol digging through and poring over old newspaper clippings, proclamations, etc. One nice thing about learning all you can about your foe - it helps keep them honest. Wofford ran a clean campaign - and so did Thornburgh, partly at least, because he knew if he started any sh*t, that we were ready to burn him badly. I think Dean's campaign calls it "rapid response".

Regarding the '04 presidential run - the rest of the field won't bother with their own oppo research - not because they don't want to attack the front runner(s), but because they won't have the money for the consultants or for the ads.

Also, they may think if they just let the big boys duke it out, they might be able to slip past to the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC