Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

General Clark Responds to Joe Lieberman's Campaign Ad

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 04:54 PM
Original message
General Clark Responds to Joe Lieberman's Campaign Ad
General Clark Responds to Joe Lieberman's Campaign Ad
http://clark04.com/press/release/048/
"I am surprised and disappointed by Joe Lieberman's campaign ad, which his campaign released today.

Leadership is about having the courage to ask the tough questions and hold our leaders accountable. Approving President Bush's budget request amounts to giving this administration another blank check in Iraq. The last time Joe Lieberman voted for giving President Bush a blank check, it led to the war in Iraq -- an unnecessary, unilateral, preemptive war. More...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Slap him around, General!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bitchslap the bitch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FightinNewDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Wrong Way Wesley rides again

Before he works himself into a high dudgeon, maybe Mr. Clark should explain why he voiced support for the war while campaigning with Katrina Swett in NH last year; and while he's at it, perhaps he could tell us why he told a gathering at the home of NH State Rep. Marjorie Smith why he supported the war resolution (which he seemed thoroughly familar with, incidentally). When he's done, he could move on to his change of heart on gays in the military, since he told people at Rep. Smith's party that he supported "Don't Ask, Don't Tell", and in fact thought it went too far...

If Clark wants to make this a contest based on straight talk, he will need better coaches than manipulative hacks like Chris Lehane and company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Got any proof? He urged to be cautious in endorsing the
resolution. Based upon a long series of conditions. Swett, the ingrate is Lieberman's campaign chair. I wouldn't wanna take her word as gospel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. This is what he believed about the war resolution
on October 9, 2002.....
http://www4.fosters.com/election_2002/oct/09/us_2cong_1009a.asp

Retired Gen. Clark supports Swett, raises concerns about Iraq policy
By STEPHEN FROTHINGHAM,Associated Press Writer
MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) — Retired U.S. Army Gen. Wesley Clark said Wednesday he supports a congressional resolution that would give President Bush authority to use military force against Iraq, although he has reservations about the country's move toward war.
----------------------
The general said he had no doubt Iraq posed a threat, but questioned whether it was immediate and said the debate about a response has been conducted backward.
"Normally in a debate, you start with a problem and consider possible solutions. Instead, the president has presented us with a solution before the problem has been fully articulated," he said.
"As far as the information we have now shows, there are no nuclear warheads on missiles pointed to America," he said. "You can't wait 10 years to act, but there is time on our side."
He said al-Qaida remains the largest terrorist threat against the United States, and the connection ----between al-Qaida and Iraq is unclear.
------------------------
After endorsing Swett in Nashua, he visited Manchester West High School and reassured history students that the threat of terrorism should be kept in perspective.
-----------------------
He said he shares the concerns he hears from many Americans about whether the country should act against Iraq without United Nations support and about how the United States will deal with Iraq after a successful invasion.
He also met in Portsmouth with the Democratic nominee in the 1st Congressional District, state Sen. Martha Fuller Clark.
A spokesman for Clark said the two were meeting to discuss foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I think I love you, Frenchie!
You are always right on the ball!

:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Where can Joe's ad campaign be found?
anyone? Does he bash Clark or just talk up his recent copy Bush* Leadership style?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. jo(k)e2004.com
What a clown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Lieberman has desperation
written all over his face.

"IT'S YOUR ECONOMY AND YOUR WAR, STUPID!"
A REAL MILITARY HERO TELLS A GENUINE INTELLIGENCE FAILURE


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemDogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. He is following Edwards' ads against the $87 billion BUT
he voted FOR it! Edwards (and Kerry and Kucinich) voted against it. (Gephardt voted for it.) The others just talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Clark finally goes on the attack
And he's spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. But, but Joe told George off today
Edited on Wed Oct-29-03 05:24 PM by lunabush
this is a press release from his campaign so I will quote it in full:

Lieberman Statement On Bush "Mission Accomplished" Mistake
(October 29, 2003)


ARLINGTON, VA Joe Lieberman issued the following statement in response to George Bush's mistaken claim today that sailors aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln had been entirely responsible for the "mission accomplished" banner for Bush's May 1 speech on the carrier. After Bush disavowed reports that his staff had been responsible for the banner, the Associated Press reported today that the White House was indeed involved in helping make the sign:

"Today was another banner day in George Bush's quest to bring honor and integrity to the White House. If he wanted to prove he has trouble leveling with the American people, mission accomplished."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Mostly good
But the message should have included a reminder that Lieberman never served. Kerry would have done that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. In the body of the release, he does speak of his service
Let Lieberbush defend his credentials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kang Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good response, but
I would have preferred if he replaced "Congress" w/Leiberman's name when he said "Last time...voted for giving...blank check, it led to the war." There's no need to get to direct in your response. Just say you're disappointed and why you disagree. By blowing him off in this manner you don't give Leiberman any more of a spotlight than he deserves. In other words, don't give him the credit of being named more than once in your statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC