I've always thought that military action might be required to achieve the objective of disarming Saddam, an objective that was unanimously supported in the United Nations
That's why I would have voted for the resolution, even though the language was far broader than any Democrat would have liked
The question was never war, anti-war
It was always how best to achieve the objective of disarmament
The high risk low reward unilateral strategy implemented by the administration came in the face of widespread opposition including John Kerry not because of the fact that military action was included
but because it was the wrong military action for the wrong objective
put simply, we were lied to by the administration, every step of the way
http://blog.johnkerry.com/blog/archives/000581.html#more